Quick poll - Do we address RB with the first or second round pick

[19andOhWait]

obviously I believe best player available combined with greatest position needs is the best way to go for any draft pick, especially in the early rounds, but just a quick yes or no here: should the position be addressed with a top pick?

[CrazyCarl40]

No. Come on.

[19andOhWait]

PS contracts:

Greene:

6/15/2009: Signed a four-year, $2.655 million contract. The deal included a $905,000 signing bonus. 2012: $615,000, 2013: Free Agentt. The deal included a $905,000 signing bonus. 2012: $615,000, 2013: Free agent

Mcknight:

6/22/2010: Signed a four-year, $2.362 million contract. The deal included a $572,000 signing bonus. 2011: $405,000, 2012: $490,000, 2013: $575,000, 2014: Free Agent

[Larz]

RB is not the problem

[HessStation]

Depends who's available but I said no.

[SenorGato]

Depends who's available but I said no.

+1

[RyanBe_Tweetin]

If Richardson's there at 16 than yes. But if he's not (which is the most likely scenario) then wait until the later rounds.

[19andOhWait]

+1 for T-rich

not sure why I voted yes, I think I was hammered but I DONT think Shonn is a long term answer. he runs hard but needs 20 carries to get going which is frustrating. Mcknight is a specialty type player and I am glad we have him but not a 25 carry guy IMO.

I am hoping that with an early pick, 1-3 rd, we target a weapon. WR hopefully S hopefully RB maybe DE maybe

[New York Mick]

If TRich is there in the first or Wilson is there in the second otherwise no and chances are they won't so no.