D'brickshaw vs Mario Williams

[Blackout]

who would you rather the Jets draft if we get Schaub or Ramsey?

[gsnts725]

Brickhouse. unless we get a really good OT in free agency and then draft Mario Williams but i doubt he'll be there when we draft.

[NIGHT STALKER]

I voted for D'Brick, but wouldn't be disappointed in Mario either if that was thc choice.

[Blackout]

myself I want Super Mario simply beacuse our defense would be amazing with him

[lawngnome o-line]

We don't need a DE, we have Ellis and Kimo...with the semi bust dewayne in the middle plus the mega bust bryan thomas also as an end...why don't we not commit another #1 to the line until we finish with our current ones.

pick up something we need, debrickshaw or leinart

[shutout]

I would love to have either of those guys,but I chose D'Brick because our O-line is a lot worse than our D-line right now. Can't go wrong with either guy though.

[JetsFanMT]

I don't like either guy at #4. If you are going to pay a guy top five money, then he should at least touch the ball. The only positions worth that kind of money are QB, RB, WR, MLB, or CB! There is a reason why almost all Team, League, or NFL MVP awards go to players in tese positions.

[Sperm Edwards]

If those are my choices I chose Brick. I still prefer to trade down as he's not the only talented OT this year by far (just the most talented & ready-to-play LT). That's ultimately what tailored my decision. You don't give someone that much coin if he's not going to be an every down player starting with game one in 2006. JMO.

Mario wouldn't upset me at all (and I think that's where we're leaning if it came down to these two) since we're going to be doing a lot of 3-4 and Kimo is neither a youngster nor a long-term solution. Also Kimo gives us someone to push Mario in camp insted of resting on his draft slot.

But I don't think we're going to take either, given:

• the depth at OT this year; it's not necessary to burn the #4 on an OT
  
• we pick again at #35 (notwithstanding another pick for Abe) where 1+ high quality OT talent (Winston, Scott, etc) will still fall
  
• the recent addition of Kimo
  
• gaping hole at NT
  
• long-term hole at QB
  

I think we're going to go with Cutler or Ngata if we're unable to trade down (which I still believe is their first preference).

[PeterNorth09]

If those are my choices I chose Brick. I still prefer to trade down as he's not the only talented OT this year by far (just the most talented & ready-to-play LT). That's ultimately what tailored my decision. You don't give someone that much coin if he's not going to be an every down player starting with game one in 2006. JMO.

Mario wouldn't upset me at all (and I think that's where we're leaning if it came down to these two) since we're going to be doing a lot of 3-4 and Kimo is neither a youngster nor a long-term solution. Also Kimo gives us someone to push Mario in camp insted of resting on his draft slot.

But I don't think we're going to take either, given:

• the depth at OT this year; it's not necessary to burn the #4 on an OT
  
• we pick again at #35 (notwithstanding another pick for Abe) where 1+ high quality OT talent (Winston, Scott, etc) will still fall
  
• the recent addition of Kimo
  
• gaping hole at NT
  
• long-term hole at QB
  

I think we're going to go with Cutler or Ngata if we're unable to trade down (which I still believe is their first preference).

That is right on the money. If we want to get better without having to wait forever we need to trade down now. Draft Cutler or Young at 4 and swap for multiple picks.

If we can get 2 1st Round picks that would be great.

This draft has excellent depth at OT. We can easily get a quality OT who is ready to start in Round 2. Winston, Colledge, O'Callaghan and Whitworth will all be there.

If we can get a stud running back (White, Addai or Maroney) in Round 1 AND a stud tight end (Davis or Pope) in Round 1 we will be good next year.

White/Pope = NY Jets' Tomlinson/Gates