jetpower10 Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 neal is a free agent, grant it is abit older but hey still a beast when it comes to blocking. Turner only signed a 1 year contract last year i do believe and is a great power runner. why not shoot for em both. both from SD but still badass guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bravejamriot Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Turner is going to get paid big money. Unless we deal Thomas Jones to free up some money that is too much to spend at RB. Neal couldnt hurt since we dont have a FB right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 No way they could afford Turner. He will get paid. Plus Thomas Jones is fine. The Jets seem to be moving in the right direction. Improving the battle at both lines of scrimmage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetpower10 Posted February 29, 2008 Author Share Posted February 29, 2008 turner i feel is better then jones. turner is a monster power runner if gotten the chance would be a badass rb in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Turner is going to get paid big money. Unless we deal Thomas Jones to free up some money that is too much to spend at RB. Neal couldnt hurt since we dont have a FB right now I don't think it'll save us money if we trade Jones. Spermyyyyy ? We need you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bravejamriot Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 That's true Sperm never mentioned him as a potential cost saver. No doubt Turner is better than Jones, but its a question of finite resources. Jones is adequate, lets see him behind a better o-line. Perhaps we draft a RB too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Not a priority, but why not sign Neal if you can get him for a reasonable amount? I like the idea of having him around to throw some blocks, in case our O-line moves don't work out as well as we hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justincredible Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 I wouldn't mind them picking up Owen Schmitt in the draft. He is going to be a stud in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyjet69 Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 That's true Sperm never mentioned him as a potential cost saver. No doubt Turner is better than Jones, but its a question of finite resources. Jones is adequate, lets see him behind a better o-line. Perhaps we draft a RB too. How can you say he is better? He's NEVER started a full season when Jones rushed for over 1100yds 3 yrs in a row, over 1200 twice!! Lamont Jordan looked good to once, remember that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.