TNJet Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Check it out guys,they have Kellen as first string qb,and also Miller starting opposite Revis...Could this be from someone with knowledge of whos ahead in camp?? Sweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Check it out guys,they have Kellen as first string qb,and also Miller starting opposite Revis...Could this be from someone with knowledge of whos ahead in camp?? Sweet. A depth chart on the internet will not give any insight on what is going on in the "battles", trust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7 to Shea Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 It has always been Mangini's practice to NOT reveal any depth chart info. I highly doubt anything on the team websie would contradict that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 It has always been Mangini's practice to NOT reveal any depth chart info. Didn't Belichick release a depth chart one year that just listed the players at each position in alphabetical order? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Teams were required to have a depth chart available by Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 http://www.newyorkjets.com/team/depth_charts/ Clemens is listed as #1 QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 On Mike and Mike this morning, Golic had a list from the League Office of each team and their probable starting quarterback. San Fran, Baltimore, Atlanta, Chicago, Miami, and the New York Jets did not list anyone as their probable starting QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.