slats Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 That OP was three years, two OCs, hundreds of players, and a fired GM ago. And probably a better representation of what was going on in real time, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraVerde Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 I think it's time to close the books on Sanchez's alleged potential to be an elite QB. He is what he is--a streaky, inaccurate, tough little dude. That's it. No QB in the league has a more comfortable situation to play in--an elite defense and special teams guaranteeing him great field position and opportunities, to go along with a good OL and high-end receiving corps. And, yet, the offense is a consistent ****fest. We can blame Scottenheimer, sure, but it's Sanchez out there still throwing INT's that rookies shouldn't even be throwing and missing receivers that rookies shouldn't miss, in Year Three. This is not to say that Sanchez isn't a good QB. Obviously, you can win with him. But, we have to stop deluding ourselves into believing that there's some great, as-yet untapped pool of talent under the surface here. He's not, nor will he ever be, a top-10 QB. He's basically the reincarnation of Steve Beurlein. blah blah blah blah someone sounds butt hurt and sounds like they are trying to still come up with excuses so that they convince themselves that they arent wrong. You know what Mark is, a stand up guy, and that is more than what A TON of Jets fans can call themselves.. http://6abc.com/sports/sanchez-greets-fans-in-postgame-cheesesteak-stop/389864/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 This thread is great, all of the people today saying one game isnt enough to say sanchez is good were saying before that three seasons were not enough evidence to say he was bad. The homerism is absolutely incredible. It's cute that you aren't able to realize that this does more to discredit your position than support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 It's cute that you aren't able to realize that this does more to discredit your position than support it. it's cute that you swallowed the bait and don't realize that tugging you are feeling is leading you to the boat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 This thread is great, all of the people today saying one game isnt enough to say sanchez is good were saying before that three seasons were not enough evidence to say he was bad. The homerism is absolutely incredible. It's cute that you aren't able to realize that this does more to discredit your position than support it. :rl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 :rl: It is pete kendalls fault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I'm surprised I gave Sanchez a three year leash. In retrospect he had taken them to two straight AFC title games and did, at times, look like he was still developing. It was actually just around that time things just seemed to get worse and worse for him. TOm Shane is mystical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 This thread is great, all of the people today saying one game isnt enough to say sanchez is good were saying before that three seasons were not enough evidence to say he was bad. The homerism is absolutely incredible. Hold up homeboy...this thread was started in the beginning of year 3, so technically 2 years, as in his 3rd year. It was the right call to give him that year....and maybe even, at least, the start of year 4. Also, I and, at least, a couple others here did say that he had all the making of a Rich Gannon type of career. Bottom line is Mark Sanchez isn't winning anybody any Super Bowl's, they gave him plenty of time to develop here, he didn't, good riddance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Hold up homeboy...this thread was started in the beginning of year 3, so technically 2 years, as in his 3rd year. It was the right call to give him that year....and maybe even, at least, the start of year 4. Also, I and, at least, a couple others here did say that he had all the making of a Rich Gannon type of career. Bottom line is Mark Sanchez isn't winning anybody any Super Bowl's, they gave him plenty of time to develop here, he didn't, good riddance. Just like it was "right" to piss away another year on geno? If you got rex as hc the only smart play is to have a qb that was developed somewhere else. Not surprising vick (who is a mere shell of his former self) is best qb play under rex's tenure. Orton wouldve brought us to playoffs last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Just like it was "right" to piss away another year on geno? If you got rex as hc the only smart play is to have a qb that was developed somewhere else. Not surprising vick (who is a mere shell of his former self) is best qb play under rex's tenure. Orton wouldve brought us to playoffs last year I agree, I think they completely muffed this Geno situation. To start the season maybe but to leave him in long enough to destroy it, is as bad a coaching decision as leaving Sanchez in for too long in 2012. IMO completely showed the ineptitude of Rex. Obviously the leash of year 4 for Sanchez vs. year 2 for Geno is completely circumstantial, given a hundred different variables.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I agree, I think they completely muffed this Geno situation. To start the season maybe but to leave him in long enough to destroy it, is as bad a coaching decision as leaving Sanchez in for too long in 2012. IMO completely showed the ineptitude of Rex. Obviously the leash of year 4 for Sanchez vs. year 2 for Geno is completely circumstantial, given a hundred different variables.. I like you. What are you up to friday night? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I like you. What are you up to friday night? Probably just chilling with the fam. I'm free. Call me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Probably just chilling with the fam. I'm free. Call me. Its a date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 Probably just chilling with the fam. I'm free. Call me. I thought we were going bowling in Cleveland with Drew Carey tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 I thought we were going bowling in Cleveland with Drew Carey tonight You never responded to my texts. So I'm sitting here watching a sleeping baby, the Incredibles and three girls knit. True story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 You never responded to my texts. So I'm sitting here watching a sleeping baby, the Incredibles and three girls knit. True story. you're not watching the Celtics-Cavs game? tell the baby I said "goo goo gaga" It's an inside joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 Love the hate--tom Shane is the boogie man must revive thread to put stake in heart! You realize you only make us stronger, right??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.