SoFlaJets Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 LWR 80 BROWN Troy 93/8 13 Childress Bam CF05 19 Smith Zuriel SF06~ 5 Musinski Rich SF05~ 18 Shelton Matt CF06 WR2 00 Kight Kelvin SF06 00 Henry Keron SF06~ RWR 87 Caldwell Reche U/SD 17 Jackson Chad 06/2~ 15 McGrew Michael CF05~ 14 Stone John SF06 19 Davis Erik CF06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 Oh no - not Keron Henry. How will we ever cover him without Ty Law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harris5214 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 do u honestly think branch is gunna be holding out that much longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xcel2NuFX Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 Daniel Graham and Ben Watson aren't mentioned here... not to burst your bubble but if you put the two of them into the equation being that NE is going to run a lot of double tight formations I would have to say they definetly give Brady enough talented recievers to throw the ball to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 Daniel Graham and Ben Watson aren't mentioned here... not to burst your bubble but if you put the two of them into the equation being that NE is going to run a lot of double tight formations I would have to say they definetly give Brady enough talented recievers to throw the ball to. Graham and Watson (as you know) aren't WR's-this is a receiever thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireJet38 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 hahahaha, pitiful. Although I do think jackson is going to be a beast and if he wasn't on the pats he would lead all rookies in recieving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 Daniel Graham and Ben Watson aren't mentioned here... not to burst your bubble but if you put the two of them into the equation being that NE is going to run a lot of double tight formations I would have to say they definetly give Brady enough talented recievers to throw the ball to. Ah, can't hate a very astute football fan who knows what he is talking about. Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 Graham and Watson (as you know) aren't WR's-this is a receiever thread If you don't think Watson will be a WR, you are kidding yourself. Watson will be in the slot 80% of the time he is on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 Branch Brown Caldwell Jackson Graham Watson VS. Andre Dyson Justin Miller David Barrett Kerry Rhodes Erik Coleman Jonathan Vilma Yeah, I think I like our chances. By the way, a special thanks to www.ourlads.com for helping me remember just who in the hell the Jets had in their secondary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 hahahaha, pitiful. Although I do think jackson is going to be a beast and if he wasn't on the pats he would lead all rookies in recieving. If Jackson is half as successful as the other UF WR's.......well he will be out of the NFL in two years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 By the way, a special thanks to www.ourlads.com for helping me remember just who in the hell the Jets had in their secondary. You could have looked under Jets Info: http://www.jetnation.com/depth/showDepthChart.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.