124 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 THEY WON'T The Jets will easily be the most predictable "one and done" team in the history of the NFL playoffs. BUT They will be there, which is 10x more anything most Jets fans and you had predicted before the season began so you must admit they are on the right track. And, if New England weren't playing Round 1 at home, they would no shot to win a playoff game in the AFC this season either. Boy do I hope we go to New England and beat em', and if not, well my Super Bowl pick Cincinnati will take care of business, but New England does have a chance, only because they're home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Were you out boozing with madmike last night? You wanna tell me how impressive a W is when Grossman gives you the ball 5 times and you still almost lost the game? You were also the home team, which is antoher big advantage. Sorry Tx, if anyone does the boozing around here it's you and DW as you wack each other off in the alley behind the bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 You wanna tell me how impressive a W is when Grossman gives you the ball 5 times and you still almost lost the game? You were also the home team, which is antoher big advantage. Dude, PennyBoy couldn't even put 1 friggn' point on the board against the Bears. The Pats beat a 9-1 team after they shut-out the Jets. The Jets fluke win in Foxboro was just one of those things that happen when divisional rivals play. And BTW, the Pats play much better on the road than they do in Foxboro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 48-45-1 48 flukes to 45 flukes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 48-45-1 48 flukes to 45 flukes 3 Lombardi Throphy's to 0 Lombardi Throphy's (it wasn't even called that way back when the Jets played in a Super Bowl). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 3 Lombardi Throphy's to 0 Lombardi Throphy's (it wasn't even called that way back when the Jets played in a Super Bowl). your right tx they should have called it the Joe willy Throphy Baby!!!! and it should look like joe holding up his finger with the win that he called! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 your right tx they should have called it the Joe willy Throphy Baby!!!! and it should look like joe holding up his finger with the win that he called! LI, were you even born when that game was played? 95% of the posters on this board were not even around way back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 LI, were you even born when that game was played? 95% of the posters on this board were not even around way back then. No,But it is nice to dream though. Have to admit a trophy with joe willy holding his finger up in the air would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 And BTW, the Pats play much better on the road than they do in Foxboro. look at the excuses this kid posts on the board..his team is 9-3 and he stills makes ecuses...lol what a loser... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 LI, were you even born when that game was played? 95% of the posters on this board were not even around way back then. sorry tx we are the new generation we dont live in the past like you do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 sorry tx we are the new generation we dont live in the past like you do... How many Super Bowls, in this "new generation", have the Jets won? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 How many Super Bowls, in this "new generation", have the Jets won? that"s a low blow tx but the way our organization is going i think we got one coming..and my pops will own you if you wanna talk football and he wont have to google search an answer like you do...:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet27 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 3 Lombardi Throphy's to 0 Lombardi Throphy's (it wasn't even called that way back when the Jets played in a Super Bowl). Dude...the Jet team that won the Super bowl, would have kicked the living crap out of the Paties (all three of the Paties super bowl winners)...that's one you can count on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Dude...the Jet team that won the Super bowl, would have kicked the living crap out of the Paties (all three of the Paties super bowl winners)...that's one you can count on. no question and willy would have guaranteed it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Dude...the Jet team that won the Super bowl, would have kicked the living crap out of the Paties (all three of the Paties super bowl winners)...that's one you can count on. Where the hell do you guys come up with this garbage? BTW 27, where did you watch Super Bowl III at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 no question and willy would have guaranteed it.... Yea, coming from a QB who has thrown a ton more INT's than TD passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Yea, coming from a QB who has thrown a ton more INT's than TD passes. yea and coming from a QB who was 16 point underdoggs and how did that gooooooo!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Yea, coming from a QB who has thrown a ton more INT's than TD passes. and dont forget with the lady"s he owns any QB in history.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 yea and coming from a QB who was 16 point underdoggs and how did that gooooooo!!!!!!!! And the Pats were 14.5 underdogs against the Rams in 2001. What is your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 And the Pats were 14.5 underdogs against the Rams in 2001. What is your point? you better thank the refs for that cause you should not have even been there...tuck rule my ars... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREEN FIEND Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Readers: Worst championship teams From the Page 2 mailbag Earlier this week, Page 2 listed our worst 10 team champions in sports history, and we asked you to send us your choices. Not everyone's buying the Tom Brady hype.After going through more than 850 e-mails, here is how Page 2 readers ranked their picks. Be sure to vote in the poll at right to crown the No. 1 worst team champion of all time. 1. 2001-02 New England Patriots (147 letters) Look at how they advanced in the playoffs. They beat the Oakland Raiders in a blizzard and on a referee's call. Oakland was by far the better team and just happened to be beaten by the elements and a rule that needs to be changed. Charles Woodson's sack on Brady was correctly called an incomplete pass, but the rule needs to be altered to call such a tuck a fumble. If the rule is as it should be, the Raiders advance and the Pats go home. Their win against Pittsburgh came because of a huge letdown by the Steelers. Pittsburgh had just manhandled the defending champion Baltimore Ravens and had used all their energy in that game. Pittsburgh was a much better team than New England this season and just suffered an immaculate emotional letdown. Kordell Stewart had an off day and was the main reason for the loss. Although I give New England tons of credit for playing the perfect game, St. Louis was by far the superior team. For the way the teams played, to need a game-ending field goal shows that St. Louis was the better team. If that game was played 100 times, I am confident that St. Louis would have won 98 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet27 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Where the hell do you guys come up with this garbage? BTW 27, where did you watch Super Bowl III at? TX, I was 8 when I saw the Jets win the SB so I do have some recollections, and let me tell you, there is no way Brady would have passed for more than 100 yards on the Jet d, let alone let a Pat receiver cross in front of the LB's...you've got to be kidding pal (if you think that you have no clue on how football was played back then). And the Paties running game against that team.....they would have been stuffed better than a 30 pound thanksgiven bird!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Readers: Worst championship teams From the Page 2 mailbag Earlier this week, Page 2 listed our worst 10 team champions in sports history, and we asked you to send us your choices. Not everyone's buying the Tom Brady hype.After going through more than 850 e-mails, here is how Page 2 readers ranked their picks. Be sure to vote in the poll at right to crown the No. 1 worst team champion of all time. 1. 2001-02 New England Patriots (147 letters) Look at how they advanced in the playoffs. They beat the Oakland Raiders in a blizzard and on a referee's call. Oakland was by far the better team and just happened to be beaten by the elements and a rule that needs to be changed. Charles Woodson's sack on Brady was correctly called an incomplete pass, but the rule needs to be altered to call such a tuck a fumble. If the rule is as it should be, the Raiders advance and the Pats go home. Their win against Pittsburgh came because of a huge letdown by the Steelers. Pittsburgh had just manhandled the defending champion Baltimore Ravens and had used all their energy in that game. Pittsburgh was a much better team than New England this season and just suffered an immaculate emotional letdown. Kordell Stewart had an off day and was the main reason for the loss. Although I give New England tons of credit for playing the perfect game, St. Louis was by far the superior team. For the way the teams played, to need a game-ending field goal shows that St. Louis was the better team. If that game was played 100 times, I am confident that St. Louis would have won 98 times. LOVE THIS! POTW NOM:cheers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Readers: Worst championship teams From the Page 2 mailbag Earlier this week, Page 2 listed our worst 10 team champions in sports history, and we asked you to send us your choices. Not everyone's buying the Tom Brady hype.After going through more than 850 e-mails, here is how Page 2 readers ranked their picks. Be sure to vote in the poll at right to crown the No. 1 worst team champion of all time. 1. 2001-02 New England Patriots (147 letters) Look at how they advanced in the playoffs. They beat the Oakland Raiders in a blizzard and on a referee's call. Oakland was by far the better team and just happened to be beaten by the elements and a rule that needs to be changed. Charles Woodson's sack on Brady was correctly called an incomplete pass, but the rule needs to be altered to call such a tuck a fumble. If the rule is as it should be, the Raiders advance and the Pats go home. Their win against Pittsburgh came because of a huge letdown by the Steelers. Pittsburgh had just manhandled the defending champion Baltimore Ravens and had used all their energy in that game. Pittsburgh was a much better team than New England this season and just suffered an immaculate emotional letdown. Kordell Stewart had an off day and was the main reason for the loss. Although I give New England tons of credit for playing the perfect game, St. Louis was by far the superior team. For the way the teams played, to need a game-ending field goal shows that St. Louis was the better team. If that game was played 100 times, I am confident that St. Louis would have won 98 times. so true... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREEN FIEND Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Look, all these Pats fans seem to forget that they used to have a team with question marks at the quarterback position needing everything to break just right for them to bring a Championship home. Caught up in all of their arrogance, they've forgotten what it feels like to be a crazy fan who feels that their underdog team can take on the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet27 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 And the Pats were 14.5 underdogs against the Rams in 2001. What is your point? TX...the point is you can't compare your Paties to our SB winner...no way no how. Go back and keep looking at your Brady poster in your room.....Brady couldn't even have made the squad then, that's the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 TX, I was 8 when I saw the Jets win the SB so I do have some recollections, and let me tell you, there is no way Brady would have passed for more than 100 yards on the Jet d, let alone let a Pat receiver cross in front of the LB's...you've got to be kidding pal (if you think that you have no clue on how football was played back then). And the Paties running game against that team.....they would have been stuffed better than a 30 pound thanksgiven bird!!!! I'm glad you were around for that game 27. And trust me, I know how defense was played in those days. Sending a WR across the middle was pure suicide. And the QB's back then didn't wear skirts either. But in my opinion, the reason the Jets won that day was how Boozer and Snell pounded the football. The OLine was tremendous that day. The Jets physically manhandled the Colts that day on both sides of the football, and that was soemthing the pundits said couldn not possibly happen. Namath gets a lot of credit for that game, but he was very average that day. A great performance by the Oline and RB's won Super Bowl III for the Jets, not Joe Namath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 TX...the point is you can't compare your Paties to our SB winner...no way no how. Go back and keep looking at your Brady poster in your room.....Brady couldn't even have made the squad then, that's the truth. I'll take that one step further 27. You can not compare football teams from different eras, especially in the NFL. Too many things (speed, size, complexity, rules, etc.) are different to make a valid comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 LOVE THIS! POTW NOM:cheers: So you are nominating 147 letters from Raider fans as POTW? They cry and whine more than Jets fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DW10 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Although a great showman, salesman, money maker, blah blah blah Joe Namath=MOST OVERRATED QB EVER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Although a great showman, salesman, money maker, blah blah blah Joe Namath=MOST OVERRATED QB EVER marino=0 rings namath=1 ring any questions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 marino=0 rings namath=1 ring any questions Wow, one measley ring 37 years ago. Whoopee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Wow, one measley ring 37 years ago. Whoopee. it"s all good like i said this is our generation we"ll get one while i am alive...sooner rather then later.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 it"s all good like i said this is our generation we"ll get one while i am alive...sooner rather then later.. That's what 40-year old Jets fans said in the early '70's. Guess what? They are all now 6-feet under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfanbkny Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 That's what 40-year old Jets fans said in the early '70's. Guess what? They are all now 6-feet under. lol thank god i got at least another 50 years left in me...:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.