johnny green balls Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 here are the current odds to win it all. Jets are 30/1, pats are 2/1 (why anyone would bet so early on a team for a lousy 2/1 payoff is beyond me). notice some of the teams (in addition to the jets) who are favored ahead of the chiefs (50/1) to win it all-- cardinals, bucs, titans skins, rams, PACKERS. looks like most everyone realizes herm is a boob at this point. also, miami and the chiefs are both at 50/1. great coaching job herm!! Odds to win the 2008 Super Bowl XLII All wagers have action. No Parlays. Arizona Cardinals 35/1 Atlanta Falcons 48/1 Baltimore Ravens 18/1 Buffalo Bills 90/1 Carolina Panthers 20/1 Chicago Bears 12/1 Cincinnati Bengals 18/1 Cleveland Browns 90/1 Dallas Cowboys 20/1 Denver Broncos 18/1 Detroit Lions 90/1 Green Bay Packers 38/1 Houston Texans 100/1 Indianapolis Colts 15/2 Jacksonville Jaguars 28/1 Kansas City Chiefs 50/1 Miami Dolphins 50/1 Minnesota Vikings 50/1 New England Patriots 2/1 New Orleans Saints 18/1 New York Giants 28/1 New York Jets 30/1 Oakland Raiders 75/1 Philadelphia Eagles 18/1 Pittsburgh Steelers 20/1 San Diego Chargers 6/1 San Francisco 49ers 18/1 Seattle Seahawks 18/1 St.Louis Rams 48/1 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 45/1 Tennessee Titans 38/1 Washington Redskins 38/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 ****ing giants... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwanaZulia Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 2/1 for that Pats? Talk about counting your chickens before they hatch. BZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 28/1 for the Giants and Jaguars ahead of the Jets is f'n comical. This league just loves the ****ing mediocre 8-8 Giants. At best they'll be 8-8 this season, at freakin' best. GIANTS SUCK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 My math may be off but Vegas has the Pats as the clear cut favorite to win the whole shabang, right? Excellent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 that 2/1 odd is based on action - it was probably 6/1 after the super bowl and kept coming down after all the free agent signings... with a flood of Boston money after they signed Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 here are the current odds to win it all. Jets are 30/1, pats are 2/1 (why anyone would bet so early on a team for a lousy 2/1 payoff is beyond me). notice some of the teams (in addition to the jets) who are favored ahead of the chiefs (50/1) to win it all-- cardinals, bucs, titans skins, rams, PACKERS. looks like most everyone realizes herm is a boob at this point. also, miami and the chiefs are both at 50/1. great coaching job herm!! Odds to win the 2008 Super Bowl XLII All wagers have action. No Parlays. Arizona Cardinals 35/1 Atlanta Falcons 48/1 Baltimore Ravens 18/1 Buffalo Bills 90/1 Carolina Panthers 20/1 Chicago Bears 12/1 Cincinnati Bengals 18/1 Cleveland Browns 90/1 Dallas Cowboys 20/1 Denver Broncos 18/1 Detroit Lions 90/1 Green Bay Packers 38/1 Houston Texans 100/1 Indianapolis Colts 15/2 Jacksonville Jaguars 28/1 Kansas City Chiefs 50/1 Miami Dolphins 50/1 Minnesota Vikings 50/1 New England Patriots 2/1 New Orleans Saints 18/1 New York Giants 28/1 New York Jets 30/1 Oakland Raiders 75/1 Philadelphia Eagles 18/1 Pittsburgh Steelers 20/1 San Diego Chargers 6/1 San Francisco 49ers 18/1 Seattle Seahawks 18/1 St.Louis Rams 48/1 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 45/1 Tennessee Titans 38/1 Washington Redskins 38/1 Did you notcie on that listall those teams were NFC teams? They are there b/c the NFC stinks and it's alot easier to get to a Sb than in the AFC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 that 2/1 odd is based on action - it was probably 6/1 after the super bowl and kept coming down after all the free agent signings... with a flood of Boston money after they signed Moss. probably. anyone who ties their money up all season for a shot at a mere 2/1 payoff is a fool though. only time i play these crazy future bets is if the jets are 50/1 and i put $10 on it just for fun. house edge on futures is assinine, also. these are strictly "for fun" bets imho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 Did you notcie on that listall those teams were NFC teams? They are there b/c the NFC stinks and it's alot easier to get to a Sb than in the AFC. did you notice that the AFC teams get a built-in edge to win it all because the AFC will probably win the SB once they get there? yet there is herm's chiefs, 50/1 worse than so many chump daddy NFC teams that no one gives a chance of winning to. thanks for supporting my point! did herm's last check bounce? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 did you notice that the AFC teams get a built-in edge to win it all because the AFC will probably win the SB once they get there? yet there is herm's chiefs, 50/1 worse than so many chump daddy NFC teams that no one gives a chance of winning to. thanks for supporting my point! did herm's last check bounce? Ouch and pnwed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 did you notice that the AFC teams get a built-in edge to win it all because the AFC will probably win the SB once they get there? yet there is herm's chiefs, 50/1 worse than so many chump daddy NFC teams that no one gives a chance of winning to. thanks for supporting my point! did herm's last check bounce? Then why are the Niners, Seattle, Carolina, NYG, Dallas and philly all above us? I think we are better than all of those teams w/ the possible exception of Seattle and you do realize KC will likely be starting a rookie QB? 50/1 has nothing to do w/ Herm but you like to make everything about Herm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Ouch and pnwed! There is nothing more annoying than folks who post "pwned" or "owned" when they don't have a clue what is going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandarinia Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 This is the stupidest thing I have ever read! How can they have odds on whos going to win the superbowl when the season hasnt even started yrt?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 This is the stupidest thing I have ever read! How can they have odds on whos going to win the superbowl when the season hasnt even started yrt?? Your kidding right? Its all about who looks best heading into the season... and for the people who bet its all about seeing through the big moves and determining who will actually have the best roster based on a lot more factors... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Your kidding right? Its all about who looks best heading into the season... and for the people who bet its all about seeing through the big moves and determining who will actually have the best roster based on a lot more factors... Actually, it has little to do with what NFL analysts think of the rosters. Many of the people who set the odds have never seen a sports game before. The odds are entirely based on the public's betting trends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 There is nothing more annoying than folks who post "pwned" or "owned" when they don't have a clue what is going on. if someone is disagreeing with you, they definitely know what's going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 There is nothing more annoying than folks who post "pwned" or "owned" when they don't have a clue what is going on. Actually, I find Herm lovers a lot more annoying but to each his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Actually, it has little to do with what NFL analysts think of the rosters. Many of the people who set the odds have never seen a sports game before. The odds are entirely based on the public's betting trends. Im not talking about that... I was giving a reason why people bet on it and how they bet on it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 Im not talking about that... I was giving a reason why people bet on it and how they bet on it... this is probably why there is an inherent win-bias. people usually place too much emphasis on free-agent signings. 2-1 odds for the pats is insane. yes, they had a great off-season but to say they now have a 33% chance to win the pinnacle of sports glory before the season even starts against 31 other teams is absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwanaZulia Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 My math may be off but Vegas has the Pats as the clear cut favorite to win the whole shabang, right? Excellent. Now only if we could get Brady on the cover of Madden 2009 we would be all set. BZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.