A-ZONE Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 Should have reviewed it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 its in the past, shoulda woulda coulda. LETS MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 Should have reviewed it... YOUR THREAD IS USELESS IM DRUNK SOMEONE WILL TELL YOU WHY IN 2 SECONDS................................................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 If it wasn't a catch there was still the PI call on Rhodes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjam76 Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 Should have reviewed it... It was pass interference anyway so it wouldn't have mattered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer76 Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 If they reviewed it, then NE has the opportunity to then accept the Pass Int call on Rhodes and spot the ball exactly where it was in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 If they reviewed it, then NE has the opportunity to then accept the Pass Int call on Rhodes and spot the ball exactly where it was in the first place. I edited your post. No reason for name calling bro. I was shocked that Simms missed that as well though. Pass interference. Herm would have reviewed it. And won. lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.