jetsrule128 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Game 2-INACTIVE should of stayed with the jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Game 2-INACTIVE should of stayed with the jets Umm duh. Inactive but on the 53 man roster means 1/17th of the league minimum.. Probably about 15K or so. On the practice squad? about 3K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsrule128 Posted December 17, 2007 Author Share Posted December 17, 2007 the jets had a plan for him they saw something in him for the future that is why they kept him on the practice squad he is just trash for the giants sitting on the inactive list they have no plan for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 He wouldn't have been active for the Jets either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsrule128 Posted December 17, 2007 Author Share Posted December 17, 2007 He wouldn't have been active for the Jets either. but we had a plan for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damaged89 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 but we had a plan for him Care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 but we had a plan for him ANd the Giants just signed him for no reason? That is some of the worst logic I've ever seen. Jets homers are funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 but we had a plan for him unless that plan entailed a spot on the active roster Danny Ware was right to leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsrule128 Posted December 17, 2007 Author Share Posted December 17, 2007 Care to elaborate? the plan for him was the future right now we did not need him but he was our rb of the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 the plan for him was the future right now we did not need him but he was our rb of the future Actually, he was just our scout team back. He pretended to be Laurence Maroney. He has a better shot of being the Giants rb of the future. The guys they have in front of him seem pretty brittle so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.