Sources: Sides eye July 21 ratification

[F.Chowds]

There is a growing belief inside league circles that the NFL and NFL Players Association will have an agreement in place that can be ratified during the July 21 league meetings in Atlanta, according to sources familiar with the state of negotiations.

As one NFL owner said this weekend, there's "no reason to believe it won't get done."

Other people familiar with the talks now think an agreement in principle will be put in place in the next seven to 10 days, a handshake deal that would allow each side to ratify the deal to start the 2011 season.

While a rookie wage system has been identified as the most complex issue still to be resolved between the owners and players as they return to the negotiating table this week in New York, the level of overall confidence in reaching an agreement also is evident in a document known as "The Transition Rules" that NFL teams would follow if and when both players and owners ratify a new labor agreement.

The Transition Rules spell out an actual timeline for roster transactions under the July 21 deal scenario, including the start of the new league year during which free agents would become eligible for the open market on July 28.

With the tight timeline, teams will be scrambling to fill rosters that must be set at 90 players on roughly Aug. 3 -- but all training camps would be able to open on time.

If the deal were to be ratified July 21, it would assure that almost all preseason games would be played, according to sources.

The one game in danger would be the Aug. 7 Hall of Fame matchup between the Bears vs. the Rams. There are still mixed opinions and thoughts as to whether that game could or would be played.

The Transition Rules also would include a designated period for teams to sign undrafted free agent rookies, a pool that routinely provides productive and even star players.

If and when the final issues are resolved, the two sides will have closed enough ground in other key areas to have an agreement in principle that the courts, players and owners must ratify. But those steps are expected to occur in the days leading up to, and during, the July 21 owners meetings in Atlanta.

Once it is done, The Transition Rules will kick in. During the lockout, the NFL's Chief Executive Committee, or CEC, have selected a group of team executives to compile a timeline for how the offseason would operate from the moment a labor deal was done. The group produced plans for the lockout ending in March, June, July and October.

The one now dated July 1 is likely to be applied to any deal done by July 21, and it would spell out how and when roster moves could and would be made. It doesn't mean the new league year will unfold exactly like this; but it won't be far off, either.

Here is how the outlined plan for a July 1 deal could be adjusted for a potential July 21 deal with what would be the corresponding dates, according to sources familiar with the document, which many teams in the league have not yet seen:

• July 1 (July 21): Educate the clubs on the news league rules and allow voluntary training for teams and agents.

• July 5 (July 25): Sign undrafted rookies, as well as give free agents a chance to re-sign with their teams.

• July 8 (July 28) -- League year starts and free agency begins.

• July 13 (Aug. 2) -- Rosters must be set at 90 players.

• July 14 (Aug. 3) -- Deadline for restricted free agents to sign offer sheets.

• July 18 (Aug. 7 ) -- A four-day match period for teams to match restricted free-agent offer sheets.

• July 23 (Aug 12) -- Deadline for rookies to sign contracts (not yet agreed upon).

• July 27 (Aug. 16) -- Signing period for restricted free agents ends, as does the signing period for franchise and transition tenders.

• Aug. 9 (Aug. 29) -- Deadline for players to report to earned credit for an accrued season toward free agency.

Of the dates, the most significant is July 28, which would be the start of the league year and the multitude of roster moves that teams have been waiting and planning for months.

The most intriguing is the deadline for rookies to sign their contracts. The NFL and NFLPA have discussed the idea of placing a deadline on rookies to sign to reduce the number of holdouts. Teams have expressed concern that the longer a rookie holds out, the higher his frequency for injury and failure are.

The two sides still must figure out this issue, as well as how much rookies will be paid and how long their contracts will be. Just as the NFL has insisted that there cannot be federal oversight in the next labor deal, the NFLPA feels just as strongly that all rookie deals be four years, according to sources.

But as one person close to the talks said this weekend, "We're at the 10-, maybe the 15-yard line, and we're marching down the field, and both sides want to score and I think we will."

Yet the disagreement over a rookie wage system for those who were drafted in late April is now the darkest cloud hanging over negotiations that are nearly complete on most major issues.

"The rookie wage scale is the only part I'm worried about," one source involved in the talks said this weekend. "They've finished the other important parts. The only issue left that can cause a problem is the rookie wage scale."

Owner and management sources maintain that the rookie wage system the players have proposed does not represent the anticipated dramatic reduction in salaries -- most notably for the top eight players chosen in the draft -- which would result in redistributed money to veteran players and retirees.

Player sources countered by saying their proposed system provides considerable reduction to the 2010 rookie salaries and that the dispute is based on owners desire to not only cut salaries drastically but control players for five years, morphing into "a dramatic veteran wage scale, not a rookie scale."

Aside from the rookie wage scale, the owners and players also have been stuck on a proposal by management that for the 2011 transition period, teams can exercise the right of first refusal on three free agents, in addition to their franchise-tag designees.

The players have rejected the proposal, which means teams could match any contract offer and retain their free agent player.

The two sides appear comfortable with a split of an all-revenue model in which players will receive about 48 percent of the money at the outset, and never less than approximately 46.5 percent as revenues are expected to grow significantly from $9.6 billion in 2011 over the term of an agreement that will be no less than seven years and couid go as long as 10.

But just as there is a roadmap for how this summer will work, there also is a roadmap for completing a deal that has taken football as hostage since March 11.

Chris Mortensen is a senior NFL analyst for ESPN. Adam Schefter is ESPN's NFL Insider.

[T0mShane]

• July 1 (July 21): Educate the clubs on the news league rules and allow voluntary training for teams and agents.

• July 5 (July 25): Sign undrafted rookies, as well as give free agents a chance to re-sign with their teams.

• July 8 (July 28) -- League year starts and free agency begins.

• July 13 (Aug. 2) -- Rosters must be set at 90 players.

• July 14 (Aug. 3) -- Deadline for restricted free agents to sign offer sheets.

• July 18 (Aug. 7 ) -- A four-day match period for teams to match restricted free-agent offer sheets.

• July 23 (Aug 12) -- Deadline for rookies to sign contracts (not yet agreed upon).

• July 27 (Aug. 16) -- Signing period for restricted free agents ends, as does the signing period for franchise and transition tenders.

• Aug. 9 (Aug. 29) -- Deadline for players to report to earned credit for an accrued season toward free agency.

Damn. GMs are gonna earn their money this year. Though I'm sure Tannenbaum has been passing love notes on the sly to players' agents the whole summer, he's going to have three days to re-sign his own FA's. That's harsh. Agents must be licking their chops right now knowing they have teams over a barrel.

[slats]

Damn. GMs are gonna earn their money this year. Though I'm sure Tannenbaum has been passing love notes on the sly to players' agents the whole summer, he's going to have three days to re-sign his own FA's. That's harsh. Agents must be licking their chops right now knowing they have teams over a barrel.

Anyone think Tanny -or any other GM- hasn't been on the horn with the agents of their prominent FA's?

The three day window is enough of an opportunity to do what they need to do with their own guys. Whether it's three days or three weeks, the players and their agents will have to decide whether the Jets' offer is good enough, or if they should hit the free market. I imagine most of them have already made up their minds which way they want to go with that. I suspect that Braylon would accept a fair deal, while Santonio will want to test the waters regardless.

[T0mShane]

Anyone think Tanny -or any other GM- hasn't been on the horn with the agents of their prominent FA's?

The three day window is enough of an opportunity to do what they need to do with their own guys. Whether it's three days or three weeks, the players and their agents will have to decide whether the Jets' offer is good enough, or if they should hit the free market. I imagine most of them have already made up their minds which way they want to go with that. I suspect that Braylon would accept a fair deal, while Santonio will want to test the waters regardless.

Absolutely on the GMs already having the parameters worked out, but you can see the scenario in which agents, by waiting a mere two days, can create a panic in a bunch of front offices. All it's going to take is one team losing a star player they thought they had in the bag to create a Domino effect--imagine Santonio signing with the Pats, for instance. Tanny would have to counter by over-paying someone like Malcolm Floyd, which would make San Diego have to go pay Steve Smith, etc etc. It could get wild, quickly, and all those wink-wink deals in principle get tossed into the shredder.

[Matt39]

Mort and Schefter are backing down from this claim now.

[Maxman]

There are more and more rumblings about this...hopefully it is true and we can all leave this non-football hell we have been living in.

[ECURB]

Wiping out both home pre-season games is fine with me... no rush... lol

[THE ILK]

Wiping out both home pre-season games is fine with me... no rush... lol

But you paid for a personal seat license for those games.

[The Crusher]

Absolutely on the GMs already having the parameters worked out, but you can see the scenario in which agents, by waiting a mere two days, can create a panic in a bunch of front offices. All it's going to take is one team losing a star player they thought they had in the bag to create a Domino effect--imagine Santonio signing with the Pats, for instance. Tanny would have to counter by over-paying someone like Malcolm Floyd, which would make San Diego have to go pay Steve Smith, etc etc. It could get wild, quickly, and all those wink-wink deals in principle get tossed into the shredder.

That as horrible to read as "Fat Free" Stop it!! Thanx!

[Matt39]

While Schefter scrambles to make up daily reports in Bristol every day, you just know Glazer is going to send out a tweet from the beach declaring the lockout is over for real.

[T0mShane]

While Schefter scrambles to make up daily reports in Bristol every day, you just know Glazer is going to send out a tweet from the beach declaring the lockout is over for real.

Schefter made a huge mistake jumping to ESPN (though I'm sure it's great for his bank account). He was a star with credibility on NFLN, and now he's just another ESPN news-repeater who gets to play second fiddle to Mortensen. Meanwhile, NFLN has tried replacing him with Jason "Dead Air" LaCanfora, who never has anything of value to say.