Warfish Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 With Zach Wilson: 7 games -- 105 for 189 (55.6%), 1,279 yards (182.7 YPG), 4 TD, 5 INT, 16 Sacks (2.3/game) Without Flacco/White: 4 games -- 113 for 183 (61.7%), 1,216 yards (304.0 YPG), 8 TD, 3 INT, 10 Sacks (2.5/game) Almost twice the games played, same offense, same coaches, same players. I think this speaks for itself, really. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Warfish said: With Zach Wilson: 7 games -- 105 for 189 (55.6%), 1,279 yards (182.7 YPG), 4 TD, 5 INT, 16 Sacks (2.3/game) Without Flacco/White: 4 games -- 113 for 183 (61.7%), 1,216 yards (304.0 YPG), 8 TD, 3 INT, 10 Sacks (2.5/game) Almost twice the games played, same offense, same coaches, same players. I think this speaks for itself, really. I dunno ... have to factor in who they played. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Just now, Dunnie said: I dunno ... have to factor in who they played. No man. "Good" defenses and "bad" defenses are like a social construct, brah. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRy56 Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 It’s clear as day. Everybody wants Zach to work out, but that’s clearly not happening right now. LFG Mike White! Maybe the Jets struck gold for once by accident 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClashFan Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 I root for whoever is the QB of the Jets to do well. That's Mike White now! I hope he can stay healthy and productive the rest of the season. We'll see! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenwichjetfan Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Mike LaFleur isn't developing Zach and is only calling the good plays for the other QBs! He's the real reason Zach wasn't playing well! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted November 28, 2022 Author Share Posted November 28, 2022 24 minutes ago, Dunnie said: I dunno ... have to factor in who they played. Ok. All ranking as of today, source Pro Football Reference: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2022/opp.htm Rankings are Passing Yards/Passing TD's Allowed Flacco: Baltimore - Pass D ranked 27th/Tie-16th Flacco: Cleveland - Pass D ranked Tie-11th/Tie-16th Flacco: Cincinnati - Pass D ranked Tie-11th/4th Wilson: Pittsburgh - Pass D ranked 24th/30th Wilson: Miami - Pass D ranked 22nd/Tie-19th Wilson: Green Bay - Pass D ranked 9th/Tie-22nd Wilson: Denver - Pass D ranked 3rd/Tie-1st Wilson: New England - Pass D ranked 7th/Tie-12th Wilson: Buffalo - Pass D ranked 17th/10th Wilson: New England - Pass D ranked 7th/Tie-12th White: Chicago - Pass D ranked 18th/Tier-15th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Just now, Warfish said: Ok. All ranking as of today, source Pro Football Reference: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2022/opp.htm Rankings are Passing Yards/Passing TD's Allowed Flacco: Baltimore - Pass D ranked 27th/Tie-16th Flacco: Cleveland - Pass D ranked Tie-11th/Tie-16th Flacco: Cincinnati - Pass D ranked Tie-11th/4th Wilson: Pittsburgh - Pass D ranked 24th/30th Wilson: Miami - Pass D ranked 22nd/Tie-19th Wilson: Green Bay - Pass D ranked 9th/Tie-22nd Wilson: Denver - Pass D ranked 3rd/Tie-1st Wilson: New England - Pass D ranked 7th/Tie-12th Wilson: Buffalo - Pass D ranked 17th/10th Wilson: New England - Pass D ranked 7th/Tie-12th White: Chicago - Pass D ranked 18th/Tier-15th Fair .. of course Chicago was down an entire secondary ..but i get your point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted November 28, 2022 Author Share Posted November 28, 2022 Just now, Dunnie said: Fair .. of course Chicago was down an entire secondary ..but i get your point. The data set will be better at the end of the season, once all is said and done. I would offer that the quality of opposing defenses is not a major factor in the stark differences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdub03 Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Dunnie said: Fair .. of course Chicago was down an entire secondary ..but i get your point. That's a difficult game to play. You could say the same thing for buffalo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.