Preston Howley III Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 They can't even beat the Colts. OK, so we didn't beat the Colts, neither. BUT we came into this season with no expectations. The Pathetics were a favorite. Last time they played the Colts: 0-1 Last time they played the Broncos: 0-1 Last time they played the Jets: 0-1 And chances are, Cindy and the bunch will meet one of those three teams in the playoffs. Can we stick a fork in them, or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 They can't even beat the Colts. OK, so we didn't beat the Colts, neither. BUT we came into this season with no expectations. The Pathetics were a favorite. Last time they played the Colts: 0-1 Last time they played the Broncos: 0-1 Last time they played the Jets: 0-1 And chances are, Cindy and the bunch will meet one of those three teams in the playoffs. Can we stick a fork in them, or what? 9-3 sitting on top of the AFCE by 2 games. Manhandled the Bears and Bengals. And I just love how you put the Jets in the same category as the Broncos and Colts. Talk about friggn' delusional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Jet Mo -- That is awesome. I got the version of his response that you PMed to me. You are right, you almost nailed it word for word. Hell, maybe he is a bot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 When you have to come from behind to beat the mighty Detroit Lions, it's pretty much over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted December 4, 2006 Author Share Posted December 4, 2006 9-3 sitting on top of the AFCE by 2 games. Manhandled the Bears and Bengals. And I just love how you put the Jets in the same category as the Broncos and Colts. Talk about friggn' delusional. TXass, you devoted your entire day to raining on our parade and blasting the Jets for a "weak schedule" blah blah blah. Your last 4 opponents are the Phins, Texans, Jax and Tennessee. What a joke. Hey, terrific. The Pats will win 12 or 13 games this year, but just remember one thing, when the green flag goes down, the BS stops. You're one and done in the playoffs this year. Oh, one other thing. Go check out the track record of the last two "dynasties", the Cowboys and Niners, since they last won a SB. Thats all you have to look forward too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted December 4, 2006 Author Share Posted December 4, 2006 And I just love how you put the Jets in the same category as the Broncos and Colts. Talk about friggn' delusional. I wasn't putting the Jets in the same category as the Broncos and the Colts, just stating the fact that the Pathetics last game against each team resulted in a Pathetic loss. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 When you have to come from behind to beat the mighty Detroit Lions, it's pretty much over. Bob, Where is the column in the standings that rewards teams for "style" points when you win a game in the NFL. Better than taking a friggn' loss against the lowly Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted December 4, 2006 Author Share Posted December 4, 2006 Bob, Where is the column in the standings that rewards teams for "style" points when you win a game in the NFL. so why did you spend 16 hours today dismissing the Jets for beating the lowly Packers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Wait a sec Tx, They manhandled the Bears, 17-13 with Brady throwing what? 2? 3? picks? And they had 4 turnovers in all. Yeah, real manhandling there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Wait a sec Tx, They manhandled the Bears, 17-13 with Brady throwing what? 2? 3? picks? And they had 4 turnovers in all. Yeah, real manhandling there. You are as bad as Bob. Please show me where in the standings where there is a column that rewards teams for "point differential" wins in the NFL. BTW, how did PennyBoy and the Jets do against the Bears? Oh yea, he hung a ZERO on the scoreboard for the 2nd time this year and took a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Bob, Where is the column in the standings that rewards teams for "style" points when you win a game in the NFL. Better than taking a friggn' loss against the lowly Browns. As my fellow north carolinian GB asked earlier....show me where in the standings a team is rewarded for strength of schedule? get a clue ya paranoid patsie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 You are as bad as Bob. Please show me where in the standings where there is a column that rewards teams for "point differential" wins in the NFL. Hey Mr. I like to spin things my way, open your eyes. You said the Pats manhandled the Bears, they clearly did not. 17-13 in a game where there was 9 turnovers = not manhandling. More like a sloppy, very poorly played football game that the Pats came on top of. Kudos to them for winning, but it was nothing close to a manhandling / blowout performance. TAKE THOSE FLYING ELVIS GLASSES OFF FOR ONCE TX'Y! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 I love these threads that reveal TX's douchebaggedness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 so why did you spend 16 hours today dismissing the Jets for beating the lowly Packers? So...you gonna go ahead and answer that one, TX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 Jet Mo -- That is awesome. I got the version of his response that you PMed to me. You are right, you almost nailed it word for word. Hell, maybe he is a bot. Jetmo's bait worked great, but it seems the fish he caught wasnt so big after all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 What is more pathetic. Tx's schtick or the fact he really believes it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shutout Posted December 5, 2006 Share Posted December 5, 2006 In regards to the Style Points and strength of schedule showing up in the standings,in the "Wild Card" thread I believe the tiebreakers went as followed 4.Strength of Victory (I.E style points) 5.Strength of Schedule So for Tx,but the answer for your question is "Style points show up in the standings right before Strength of schedule" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.