RutgersJetFan Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 sure it can... if the data is good, the pollyanna's do the extrapolation and then debbie downers point out why it's flawed.. If the numbers were bad, it'd be reversed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 even I can appreciate a Janosz reference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 28, 2011 Author Share Posted September 28, 2011 yeah, my 4 year old loves them. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 yeah, my 4 year old loves them. He'll still love 'em at 6 yrs old like mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 He'll still love 'em at 6 yrs old like mine. My dad's 30-year-old still also likes them. Megatron is the bomb yo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Transformers are awesome. And I'm not talking about the Michael Bay-Shia Lebouf abomination. My 3 1/2 year old is all about them. And I enjoy watching with him. PRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIMEEEEEEEEEEEEE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Unfortuantely, that's going to disappoint a lot of people. You see Sanchez is supposed to suck big time and should not even be on a top 30 list! haha true. I think its a major statement to be 13th with Shotty as your OC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 I feel like you've been trying to disagree with me a lot lately, yet we're practically saying the same thing. I disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Well I'm being looked upon as one of the latter and I certainly don't go around babbling about how I seriously believe Sanchez is likely to finish the season with about 30 interceptions+fumbles, and furthermore that is an indication he's worse than he's ever been at protecting the football. Is Cam Newton going to pass for 5400 yards this year? Hey, he's on pace to do just that. It's absurd from either angle. meh, just stat spinning... pretty common Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 sure it can... if the data is good, the pollyanna's do the extrapolation and then debbie downers point out why it's flawed.. If the numbers were bad, it'd be reversed. Bingo. Or like in this case, items are picked and chosen based on which side they align with, like how we get to hear from some of those more down on Sanchez why the INT #s accurately project Sanchez's season while every other statistic is flawed (and of course there are some of those supporting taking it to the opposite extreme). I guess my biggest issue is I can get why the blind lovers of any player or coach can make an endless list of excuses and not even being aware they are doing it, as they truly believe it's all justified somewhere in their heads, even if I completely disagree with it. But how can anyone really think it's at all reasonable having to constantly make excuses for positive signs of success or improvement? This thread is the perfect example, because we've been hearing lately why much of Sanchez's improved numbers are based entirely on the opposition, and yet the moment weighted analyses are provided that are designed to account for exactly that, they are immediately dismissed for a whole new set of reasons, simply because they don't portray Sanchez in a poor enough light. Bottom line, I don't care what side you're on, if every time your last excuse get's shot down you have to scramble come up with a brand new excuse for it, chances are you're probably being a tad unreasonable. That goes for either extreme, whether they think Sanchez is already an elite level QB, or those who think he's terrible and shown no improvement. In this case, it just so happens that the latter group is going to catch a lot more heat for their views, which isn't entirely surprising or even undeserved. Considering the amount of heat we used to catch back in the day for our "ACM agenda", based around a far more strongly fact-supported case with a much larger data set to back it up, I'm not exactly about to start feeling any sympathy for those who think they're getting picked on for taking every opportunity they can to take shots at the Jets current QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Even though some people question Sanchez's accuracy, if he had Megatron, his #'s would look 10x better. Megantron would be running the same bullsh*t slant routes that Holmes is running if that was the case. Fire Schotty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Even the guy that's been, by far, the one who's gone furthest off the deep end in this bizarre set of discussions concedes this sh*t. I mean come on already with the narratives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.