WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Never bought into that mantra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Unvote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pac Posted July 30, 2012 Author Share Posted July 30, 2012 Official Vote Count: Wombat (6) - Verb, Nolder, SMC, BG, DPR, Christine JetFat80 (4) - JiF, CTM, Tina, Leelou SMC (2) - Wombat, JVoR JiF (2) - Blob, JC JVOR (1) - Dan Verb (1) - AVM DPR (1) - JiF Nolder (1) - Smash With 19 alive, it takes 10 punches to get knocked out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Unvote Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Rereading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Interesting. What. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 So, if true - then my guess is Wombat's got a guilty he wants us to have, since it seems he's trying to get lynched and what not... so we can lynch wombat and likely confirm that SMC is scum, or trust wombat and lynch SMC and then let scum deal with Wombat. If he's running a play as scum, then he's got to be giving us SMC, and if he doesn't die soon we just lynch him for living too long... no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 What. That unvote could be the action of someone who doesn't want CTM revealed. Put together with the fact that you and Verbal moved to Sharrow with no explanation when CTM was the lead votegetter and I'm starting to see an interesting picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 So, if true - then my guess is Wombat's got a guilty he wants us to have, since it seems he's trying to get lynched and what not... so we can lynch wombat and likely confirm that SMC is scum, or trust wombat and lynch SMC and then let scum deal with Wombat. If he's running a play as scum, then he's got to be giving us SMC, and if he doesn't die soon we just lynch him for living too long... no? Nope. I don't have any investigation results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPR Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 So, if true - then my guess is Wombat's got a guilty he wants us to have, since it seems he's trying to get lynched and what not... so we can lynch wombat and likely confirm that SMC is scum, or trust wombat and lynch SMC and then let scum deal with Wombat. If he's running a play as scum, then he's got to be giving us SMC, and if he doesn't die soon we just lynch him for living too long... no? This would be a seriously liberal interpretation of the "Oracle" role. It would have made more sense to split up Cop roles, not to mention that if Wombat made it through three or four nights, his info on death would pretty much mean the end of the game. It doesn't make any sense the way he described it. Also, it doesn't sound like he is given the the results, so he wouldn't know who is what anyhow. This reveal stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I think I'm buying what Wombat is selling. Unvote, Vote: SMC Still on Long Island. Fly home tomorrow. Little activity till Tuesday at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Nope. I don't have any investigation results. Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 That unvote could be the action of someone who doesn't want CTM revealed. I believe he's already been revealed to be Polack. You suck at this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Nope. I don't have any investigation results. This would be a seriously liberal interpretation of the "Oracle" role. It would have made more sense to split up Cop roles, not to mention that if Wombat made it through three or four nights, his info on death would pretty much mean the end of the game. It doesn't make any sense the way he described it. Also, it doesn't sound like he is given the the results, so he wouldn't know who is what anyhow. This reveal stinks. Ah, I misunderstood the reveal. Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Really? The Oracle only yields results on 1 player (selected at night) upon death, if I'm reading Wombat's explanation correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Fine. Really think JiF is scum anywho... Unvote. Vote JiF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Would also like to see Verbal's alignment as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Fine. Really think JiF is scum anywho... Unvote. Vote JiF Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I'll follow Dan. Vote JVOR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I'll follow Dan. Vote JVOR I'm curious why you don't seem willing to vote for the people you say are scummy, and instead keep following people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Actually, nah. Don't want to kill JVOR yet after he's been away so long, even if he's scum. Unvote vote Verbal Feels much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I'm curious why you don't seem willing to vote for the people you say are scummy, and instead keep following people... OK OK FINE I CHANGED MY VOTE I CHANGED IT. Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I'm curious why you don't seem willing to vote for the people you say are scummy, and instead keep following people... It does seem like a good way to avoid accountability for one's votes. On the other hand, one could get the same result by not voting at all and nudging selected trains like you are. Who would you like to see lynched? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Actually, nah. Don't want to kill JVOR yet after he's been away so long, even if he's scum. Unvote vote Verbal Feels much better. Dan's case on JVOR was that he seemed to list a bunch of oft-discussed players in his FOS. Your play has been to basically put your vote wherever the discussion or a strong town-leader points. Tagging along with Crusher, then Dan, who else was it you piggy-backed? Need to look... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Why? A hunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Hahaha, yeah, you won't garner the same reaction from me that you did Smash last game. Try as you might, you calling people names is one of the more feeble things we see in mafia on a regular basis. Apart from that, all I see is you trying to attach me to Wombat as "defending him" because you cannot get your head around the idea that I might encourage him because 1) his play doesn't make sense to me as a scum play, and 2) I want to see where things go. At the moment, I'm not sure if what you are doing is the same sort of "attaching" that is symptomatic of townie play, or what I caught a couple people doing last game where they were lining up D2 lynches on D1 results BEFORE we had them. You do realize the hilarity of that idea coming from you? In this case, I wasn't trying to draw any sort of reaction from you whatsoever, rather was making a point about how ridiculous you were acting, which was true. You want to talk about "feeble things"? This is coming from the guy who's attempt to criticize a post that dared say something negative about him was by nitpicking the choices of adverbs (which you were actually wrong about anyway, but let's not even go there). Aside from that, I know you're infamous for making sure you always give yourself outs for every stance you take, which is why I give little merit to you having a ready excuse for taking a stance someone else disagrees with. If you don't think Wombat scum than so be it, that's your call, but don't expect it to reflect well on you when your actions are trying to defend him and then the moment you are called out on it, you immediately try to pretend like no such thing is happening. You can keep throwing things in quotes all you like, it doesn't suddenly mean they're not happening. Of course I could turn out to be absolutely wrong about Wombat, but the difference is I'm willing to take my stance that I haven't liked his play through this point. If somebody has an issue with that (as it would seem you do), then I have to live with that and stand by it, as opposed to start giving off a list of reasons why that's really not the case and how it can't be held against me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Also, has AVM done anything this game besides sheep Crusher and spam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 It does seem like a good way to avoid accountability for one's votes. On the other hand, one could get the same result by not voting at all and nudging selected trains like you are. Who would you like to see lynched? There's a handful of people that I feel would make informative lynches today. CTM, BG, Dan, 80, you or SMC are all tied to observations I've made either in-thread or in-mind and could prove informative. This is not to imply I am suspicious of all of them, I just feel they would be informative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 You do realize the hilarity of that idea coming from you? In this case, I wasn't trying to draw any sort of reaction from you whatsoever, rather was making a point about how ridiculous you were acting, which was true. You want to talk about "feeble things"? This is coming from the guy who's attempt to criticize a post that dared say something negative about him was by nitpicking the choices of adverbs (which you were actually wrong about anyway, but let's not even go there). Aside from that, I know you're infamous for making sure you always give yourself outs for every stance you take, which is why I give little merit to you having a ready excuse for taking a stance someone else disagrees with. If you don't think Wombat scum than so be it, that's your call, but don't expect it to reflect well on you when your actions are trying to defend him and then the moment you are called out on it, you immediately try to pretend like no such thing is happening. You can keep throwing things in quotes all you like, it doesn't suddenly mean they're not happening. Of course I could turn out to be absolutely wrong about Wombat, but the difference is I'm willing to take my stance that I haven't liked his play through this point. If somebody has an issue with that (as it would seem you do), then I have to live with that and stand by it, as opposed to start giving off a list of reasons why that's really not the case and how it can't be held against me. Someone has to stir the pot. And the Ape seems to be taking on the scummy passive style of play this game, so it's not going to be him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Also, has AVM done anything this game besides sheep Crusher and spam? No, he's hiding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 There's a handful of people that I feel would make informative lynches today. CTM, BG, Dan, 80, you or SMC are all tied to observations I've made either in-thread or in-mind and could prove informative. This is not to imply I am suspicious of all of them, I just feel they would be informative. Fair enough. Btw, I think you should go back to your regular style. Passive = anti-town imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 There's a handful of people that I feel would make informative lynches today. CTM, BG, Dan, 80, you or SMC are all tied to observations I've made either in-thread or in-mind and could prove informative. This is not to imply I am suspicious of all of them, I just feel they would be informative. Other than 80 and Wombat...I'm not sure what the lynch of the others tells us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 You do realize the hilarity of that idea coming from you? In this case, I wasn't trying to draw any sort of reaction from you whatsoever, rather was making a point about how ridiculous you were acting, which was true. You want to talk about "feeble things"? This is coming from the guy who's attempt to criticize a post that dared say something negative about him was by nitpicking the choices of adverbs (which you were actually wrong about anyway, but let's not even go there). Aside from that, I know you're infamous for making sure you always give yourself outs for every stance you take, which is why I give little merit to you having a ready excuse for taking a stance someone else disagrees with. If you don't think Wombat scum than so be it, that's your call, but don't expect it to reflect well on you when your actions are trying to defend him and then the moment you are called out on it, you immediately try to pretend like no such thing is happening. You can keep throwing things in quotes all you like, it doesn't suddenly mean they're not happening. Of course I could turn out to be absolutely wrong about Wombat, but the difference is I'm willing to take my stance that I haven't liked his play through this point. If somebody has an issue with that (as it would seem you do), then I have to live with that and stand by it, as opposed to start giving off a list of reasons why that's really not the case and how it can't be held against me. Blah ****ing blah... I didn't read any of this. You talk more than you comprehend. I'm assuming you are still trying to tell me what I'm doing. Because yeah, I'm not aware of the way I'm playing. AT ALL. Dummy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 No, he's hiding. He plays in spurts as town and scum...not sure what to make of it this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Other than 80 and Wombat...I'm not sure what the lynch of the others tells us... CTM tells us about Nolder, Dan, and SMC. BG tells us about Dan. You tell us very little. SMC tells us about Dan, CTM, and possibly JiF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.