SoFlaJets Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 http://msn.foxsports.com/video/NFL?vid=6863dd59-6ca3-432f-8597-09e7b2a3b96c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 bumping this so everybody gets to see what a member of the MSM thinks about the Jets-hey they even mentioned Super Bowl and the 2009 New York Jets in the same sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 bumping this so everybody gets to see what a member of the MSM thinks about the Jets-hey they even mentioned Super Bowl and the 2009 New York Jets in the same sentence yeah as in......."the jett chances of going to the superbowl i9n 2009 are even less than my chances of having butt sex with megan fox". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guido Monzino Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 yeah as in......."the jett chances of going to the superbowl i9n 2009 are even less than my chances of having butt sex with megan fox". Makes a lot of sense considering the 2009 Super Bowl was already played a month and a half ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 yeah as in......."the jett chances of going to the superbowl i9n 2009 are even less than my chances of having butt sex with megan fox". Who knows? Megan might like wearing a strap-on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 Who knows? Megan might like wearing a strap-on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 Makes a lot of sense considering the 2009 Super Bowl was already played a month and a half ago. I see reading retention isn't your strong suit either ther Guido Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 The Jets defense could be a powerhouse in 2009. I want to wait and see what will happen between now and September though. I'm convinced we will look to add something in the draft too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanNick12 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Im very anxious to see all this unfold...now we just need a good Offense and we are set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeC36 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 i really hope one day that the Jets have a defense that is down right scary. You know the kind where opposing teams circle that date saying "were really gonna need to buckle the chin straps cause they come to **** **** up" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDjoey Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 The Jets defense could be a powerhouse in 2009. I want to wait and see what will happen between now and September though. I'm convinced we will look to add something in the draft too. Right Now (hope Im wrong) I don't see the Jet defense being as good as alot of other Jet fans think its going to be. First off Jet are playing alot better teams this year than last year. Against last year weak schedule , the Jets finished 27 th against the pass. Were the upgrades on defense good enough to improve those numbers. Where is the pass rush coming from. IF verrnon Gholston dosen't come on your basically talking about the same guys being counted on to get a pass rush. (is that really good enough) How bad is this offense going to be. Last year Jets were very sucessful running the football What happens if that is not the case this year. Now suddenly the defense log more minutes on the field. Last year jets stayed relatively healthy on both sides of the ball. Whats the chance of that happening agin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 I guess I'm the only one who couldn't hear the interview because it was recorded too low? EDIT: I heard it (by blasting the volume and putting my ear next to the speaker--and, no, it wasn't my computer 'cause the preceding commercial was loud). I thought this defense would improve simply by Rex's presence because I think Mangini was a bad HC on defense. People killed Sutton, but it was Mangini's read-and-react scheme and his decision to have Pace drop in coverage the majority of the time & have Rhodes 20 yards from the line of scrimmage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.