...he wouldn't have been sacked so many times if he didn't have protection.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:22 PM
...he wouldn't have been sacked so many times if he didn't have protection.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:11 PM
Then, how can it possibly be such a surprise when he IS sacked that he simply can't hold on to the ball. You'd think he'd have a better feel for it by now.
Edited by Villain The Foe, 15 December 2012 - 09:12 PM.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:18 PM
Big bang theory? Really?Science is bullsh*t.
Math like science can be formed to support an idea (hence big bang theory lmao). With that said, I'd prefer to take what I see over what science or math you're talking about.math is bullsh*t
Edited by Villain The Foe, 15 December 2012 - 09:19 PM.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:43 PM
Big bang theory? Really?
Math like science can be formed to support an idea (hence big bang theory lmao). With that said, I'd prefer to take what I see over what science or math you're talking about.
The f'ing line sucks, our QB sucks, our WR's suck and our RB sucks (outside of powell. I like what I see from him) Our coachs suck, our coordinators suck and our front office including the owner sucks.
I dont need some science or math book to understand what I already see.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:54 PM
Big bang theory? Really?
Math like science can be formed to support an idea (hence big bang theory lmao). With that said, I'd prefer to take what I see over what science or math you're talking about.
The f'ing line sucks, our QB sucks, our WR's suck and our RB sucks (outside of powell. I like what I see from him) Our coachs suck, our coordinators suck and our front office including the owner sucks.
I dont need some science or math book to understand what I already see.
This is like having a cat with leukemia.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 10:32 PM
I dont need some science or math book to understand what I already see.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 15 December 2012 - 11:19 PM
I dont know how many other ways to say it. Maybe I should change the language or something lol. Sanchez is freaking horrid, however, that offensive line is terrible.
I'll say it again. Sanchez is freaking horrible, however, that offensive line is terrible.
Posted 16 December 2012 - 05:38 PM
Im no one special. Just a man with an opinion. I never said stats werent helpful. Im simply saying that stats doesnt necessarily mean truth. It was a scientific fact that the world was flat until it was a scientific fact that it wasnt. See??? Both were facts, but only one was actually "true". It took a man to get into a ship and actually see for himself.im confused though are you an NFL analyst? Statistics are helpful for the common man that puts things into easy to understand numbers. Numbers are universal and cant be argued so it helps more then what someone would "see"
Edited by Villain The Foe, 16 December 2012 - 05:39 PM.
Posted 16 December 2012 - 05:43 PM
It's not my reading comprehension that is off, it is YOURS. Or maybe your sense of logic. It doesn't matter how many times he gets sacked, I'm talking about percentage of sacks on which he fumbles. What is so hard to understand? If he gets sacked six times and fumbles two of them, that is too much, if he gets sacked 100 times and fumbles 33 of them, that is too much. If he gets sacked 100,000 times and fumbles 33,000 of them, that is too much. Let me know when you get it.
Also, since the offensive line is horrible, no one would know it better than him, right? You'd think he'd make some sort of mental adjustment to insure he doesn't lose the football, no?
Posted 16 December 2012 - 05:44 PM
The love that im getting from you and debatesman is really off the charts. Im about ready to drop a tear! lol
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:57 PM
I've already answered this. Obviously there's another language needed.
Edited by Gastineau Lives, 16 December 2012 - 08:00 PM.
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:19 PM
Excuse me, but you're the idiot. Not me. Of course only an idiot wouldn't be able to see that. You're one of the more infamous idiots on this board, so maybe you should try another language, maybe something exotic like Swahili, so then at least then nobody would be able to understand your idiotic posts but the idiot that serves as your inside voice.
Edited by Villain The Foe, 16 December 2012 - 08:23 PM.
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:23 PM
I noticed that you added more. So let me respond to that by saying this.
Im "personal attack proof", especially from those who claim to be personal attack proof yet throw personal attacks lmao. I am quite infamous on this board arent I??? Thanks to folks like yourself. You keep me around because my "idiot" comments linger in your thoughts. I can take a vacation from this board for a few months like I've done, come back and you'll still feel the same way about me. Funny thing is, Im infamous to you, yet your history here isnt even remembered by me.
Im winning, and you'll go to bed tonight thinking about me....which is kinda gay! lol.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users