Matt39 Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Russell would be a terrible pick at 3. We'd be better off taking Mudiay. Carmelo is just an albatross no matter what. His being here doesn't really change anything as far as the draft and stuff. Why dont you like Russell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Guaranteed in the top 5. Yay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Guaranteed in the top 5. Yay. I don't know if you're being facetious, but guaranteed top 5 is a good thing. Plus, they have an 87% chance of being top 4. Maybe Jax's basketball gods shine on the Knicks because unlike Philly and Minny, both who lost 10 in a row to close the season, the Knicks didn't tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 If we end up with the 5th pick I'm kicking my tv. FU Fisher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Guys they're learning how to win relax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Mr. Perfect loves my cock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 According to Fisher in today's pregame he hasn't spoken to Jax about hurting the lottery odds. I hope he's lying. Jax is turning out to be one of the worse hires in franchise history. We were better off with Stu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 If we end up with the 5th pick I'm kicking my tv. FU Fisher Then Jax's basketball gods would've been against the Knicks because there is only a 13% chance of that happening. Think of that, the Knicks have better odds (19%) of getting the 1st pick as they do of getting the 5th (13%). I still maintain they are in good shape and, when this season fell apart, I did say that being the 2nd lotto seed was a good thing so I'll stick to that. They're only off from the top seed by 6%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 We were better off with Stu? The Knicks haven't known how to build a team since the 1970s. The early 1990 teams were a scrap heap team thrown together because the Knicks were afraid Patrick was going to leave as a FA in 91ish so they hired Riley to convince him to stay. They then put together a team of rejects that played as hard as anyone, but was short on talent. If you really think about it, the Jets have done a better job at drafting than the Knicks in the last 30 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Then Jax's basketball gods would've been against the Knicks because there is only a 13% chance of that happening. Think of that, the Knicks have better odds (19%) of getting the 1st pick as they do of getting the 5th (13%). I still maintain they are in good shape and, when this season fell apart, I did say that being the 2nd lotto seed was a good thing so I'll stick to that. They're only off from the top seed by 6%. I'm ok with the 4 and I would be jizzing if we got a top 3 pick. The 5 pick would be an unmitigated disaster Cauley-Stein is a nice players he is not worth tanking for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 We were better off with Stu? Phil inherited an extremely mediocre team and was given the order to bring a championship. You do that by tanking and getting cap space. I am upset that they didn't tank hard enough it's scary to think we purposely flush the season away and end up not getting a top 4 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 The Knicks haven't known how to build a team since the 1970s. The early 1990 teams were a scrap heap team thrown together because the Knicks were afraid Patrick was going to leave as a FA in 91ish so they hired Riley to convince him to stay. They then put together a team of rejects that played as hard as anyone, but was short on talent. If you really think about it, the Jets have done a better job at drafting than the Knicks in the last 30 years. Remember the year they took John Wallace, Walter McCarty and Dontae Jones all in the first round, all like 3 picks apart from each other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Remember the year they took John Wallace, Walter McCarty and Dontae Jones all in the first round, all like 3 picks apart from each other? Brutal. It's saying something when their best 1st round pick in 25 yrs was Charlie Ward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Brutal. It's saying something when their best 1st round pick in 25 yrs was Charlie Ward. lmfao David Lee wasnt a terrible pick. I remember when we took Donnell Harvey and I was like, did they watch a single Florida game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 I was there. I was there from 96-2006 basically every game, then back from the end of the 2011 season through summer 2012. Granmama's 4 point play. I shook the Iceman's hand when we lost to them in the '99 Finals. I liked some of those '90's teams. If they weren't so obsessed with keeping Ewing happy they might have done some real damage. The '99 team was better when he was hurt and they could run. In the late '90's they had two of my favorite all-time most underrated, but well past their primes - Buck and Terry Cummings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 Brutal. It's saying something when their best 1st round pick in 25 yrs was Charlie Ward. Maciej light the Lampe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 Maciej light the Lampe French Toast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 I was there. I was there from 96-2006 basically every game, then back from the end of the 2011 season through summer 2012. Granmama's 4 point play. I shook the Iceman's hand when we lost to them in the '99 Finals. I liked some of those '90's teams. If they weren't so obsessed with keeping Ewing happy they might have done some real damage. The '99 team was better when he was hurt and they could run. In the late '90's they had two of my favorite all-time most underrated, but well past their primes - Buck and Terry Cummings. I came in my pants when I saw buck Williams reject Jordan. That '97 team could have beaten the bulls. Thank you David Stern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 You suck at math, Larz. If the Knicks are the 3rd lottery seed that means they can fall as far as 6th in the lottery and not get the 3rd pick you want. As the 3rd lottery seed, the Knicks will only have a 15% chance at actually getting the 3rd pick. However, they have a 53% chance of getting picks 4th through 6th as the the 3rd lottery seed. However, as the 2nd lottery seed, they'll have a 55% chance of getting a top-3 pick. So Larz, you don't want them to win tonight under any circumstance if you want them to get the 3rd pick. wait what ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 French Toast We drafted 2 horrific players from France between 1999 and 2003. How has Scott layden ever managed to have a job doing anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Melo's new shoes. Much class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Melo's new shoes. Much class. That's retarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Those things got LED lights! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Seeing Okafor at the Hawks game last night gave me sad pants. What could have been... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Seeing Okafor at the Hawks game last night gave me sad pants. What could have been... I'm still dreaming of top 2. Knicks have a 38.7% chance of landing top 2. They had a 46.5% chance of landing top 2 if they had the worst record. That's only a 7.8% chance difference. Until Knicks-life does something awful again, I'll continue to dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I'm still dreaming of top 2. Knicks have a 38.7% chance of landing top 2. They had a 46.5% chance of landing top 2 if they had the worst record. That's only a 7.8% chance difference. Until Knicks-life does something awful again, I'll continue to dream. Maybe. Probably not. I've accepted the notion that until Dolan is dead, we're forever stuck in a timeloop where Jackie Treehorn's henchmen are perpetually pissing on our rug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Maybe. Probably not. I've accepted the notion that until Dolan is dead, we're forever stuck in a timeloop where Jackie Treehorn's henchmen are perpetually pissing on our rug. Hold that thought until June to test that theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Hold that thought until June to test that theory. May 19th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Maybe. Probably not. I've accepted the notion that until Dolan is dead, we're forever stuck in a timeloop where Jackie Treehorn's henchmen are perpetually pissing on our rug. After the first episode of pissing, does it really matter? Or is the rug being laundered in between? If so, which seasons does the clean rug represent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 May 19th.No, June, because if the Rangers win The Cup that blows a hole into the It's - All - Dolan's - Fault narrative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 After the first episode of pissing, does it really matter? Or is the rug being laundered in between? If so, which seasons does the clean rug represent? Obviously you're not a golfer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 No, June, because if the Rangers win The Cup that blows a hole into the It's - All - Dolan's - Fault narrative. It doesn't count for hockey. He stays out of that sh*t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 It doesn't count for hockey. He stays out of that sh*t.Maybe he tried to do for Jax what he did for Sather, but Jax had proved to be incompetent so that is up in smoke. Did you see Jax's bizarre press conference? He took credit for sending Tyson, JR etc. to good teams. Dude, that's not your job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Obviously you're not a golfer. True, that rug really did tie the room together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Maybe he tried to do for Jax what he did for Sather, but Jax had proved to be incompetent so that is up in smoke. Did you see Jax's bizarre press conference? He took credit for sending Tyson, JR etc. to good teams. Dude, that's not your job. That's the thing. Even when he tries to find someone to balance out his stupidity, he fails at that. You think he's still going to be willing to sit on the bench after Phil ******* Jackson sh*ts the bed? No chance. We are ****ed, my friend. Royally ****ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.