bitonti Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 i like how Jets fans are so optimistic "What if they hit on a franchise QB two years in a row?! Wouldn't that be a great problem to have?" dudes we haven't had a FQB since Namath let's not "worry" about what happens when they get 2 in 2 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pointdexter Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, Skeptable said: Watson is gonna be Vince Young Said the guy who has no clue what he's talking about . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 4 hours ago, Integrity28 said: If we hit on a QB, then we won't be picking first next year. False argument. Thread over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeptable Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, Pointdexter said: Said the guy who has no clue what he's talking about . What are you talking about? What makes you more of an expert then me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pointdexter Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 12 minutes ago, Skeptable said: What are you talking about? What makes you more of an expert then me? Fair enough. I should give you a fair shot to back your argument. Tell me all the reasons why you think they are the same guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 minute ago, Pointdexter said: Fair enough. I should give you a fair shot to back your argument. Tell me all the reasons why you think they are the same guy. Black dudes that wore orange in college. duh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 41 minutes ago, Skeptable said: Watson will be a bust... Mark it... He will go down as a great leader and college QB... He has trouble reading Defenses, and his arm strength is a big issue. Which is exactly why you don't draft him at 6. I like him alot if I decided to pick at 6 and not trade down though he would not be the pick. This team needs help everywhere. OL, LB. Secondary, WR, TE, etc. They need to make this pick count in the worst way and drafting a QB with that pick in a weak QB class just makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pointdexter Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 28 minutes ago, Maxman said: Thread over. Except that it's not. Simple reading of above posts reveal that 2 hall of famers in the modern era went 1-15 and 3-13, respectively, in their first year (aikman, manning). I'm sure I can find more examples. Bottom line is a rookie qb is winning about 3 games with this roster. What you hope to see is flashes of potential. Tampa Bay didn't light it up in Jameis' first yr (with a better roster than Jets) but it was plain to see by anyone who was watching that he was a franchise QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 36 minutes ago, j4jets said: Yeah, except its not false. Manning won 3 games his first season. We're talking about a FHoF QB. With our roster, a rookie Dan Marino isnt winning more than 5. Keyword: Rookie. The Giants won 6 games in 2004. They did not get the 1st pick overall the following year. Keywords: invalid argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 15 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: The Giants won 6 games in 2004. They did not get the 1st pick overall the following year. Keywords: invalid argument. Keywords: I just made it a valid argument and showed you how you were wrong calling out the op. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 We're not getting Darnold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Skeptable said: Watson is gonna be Vince Young That's what I'm afraid of All these guys, Young, Tebow are effective at first then NFL teams get enough tape on them and it's over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Whether we are talking about Darnold or one of the other high end prospects next year imo this team needs to get some ammo to traded up next year if necessary,. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 22 minutes ago, j4jets said: Keywords: I just made it a valid argument and showed you how you were wrong calling out the op. No, you didn't. If anything, your bad example solidified my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATX Jetsfan Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 2 hours ago, Beerfish said: Such quality player evals. Never take a USC QB Always take Penn state Linebackers Never take Penn state running backs Always take Boston College olineman Never take Wisconsin running backs Always take Wisconsin lineman Always take Florida or FSU DBS Sometimes take Cal QBs Always take Missouri pass rushers Never take Texas tech QBs Always take USB RB's Never take Oregon QBs Take a player from Pitt every 4th year Never take Bama DBS Take OSU olineman but avoid all other positions. All kidding aside. If you really take history into account. If you were to follow this, you would be doing alright. lol You can add in always Purdue LB/DE hybrids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Pointdexter said: Except that it's not. Simple reading of above posts reveal that 2 hall of famers in the modern era went 1-15 and 3-13, respectively, in their first year (aikman, manning). I'm sure I can find more examples. Bottom line is a rookie qb is winning about 3 games with this roster. What you hope to see is flashes of potential. Tampa Bay didn't light it up in Jameis' first yr (with a better roster than Jets) but it was plain to see by anyone who was watching that he was a franchise QB. Take a look at Derek Carr as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 3 hours ago, nycdan said: Well we know that's not true. Let's see....we have 'intangibles', 'offseason super bowls', 'beating the Pats in the regular season', 'having a player selected as an All Pro'. The list goes on... The **** was I thinking! lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Integrity28 said: No, you didn't. If anything, your bad example solidified my point. Oh look, you went to your fallback option of an insulting comment. How shocking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 10 minutes ago, j4jets said: Oh look, you went to your fallback option of an insulting comment. How shocking! You were insulted by "no you didn't"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 20 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: You were insulted by "no you didn't"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 2 hours ago, j4jets said: Even your use of gifs is irrelevant. Every response proves the gif I used right. Take notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealeb319 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Is a Kyle Wilson type player available? You don't find special talents like him in the draft often.Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 2 hours ago, Integrity28 said: Even your use of gifs is irrelevant. Every response proves the gif I used right. Take notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.