joewilly12 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 4 hours ago, Powpow said: This team is several years from contending and that's if things fall into place. Decker carries a big price tag. Is it worth keeping him around for the revival movement of this team for 3-5 years? As far as Hack's development, we might as well kept Marshall another couple of years if they were so concerned about his progress. Would Decker even want to be part of another 'rebuild' and a roster that is significantly less skilled than it was when he first arrived? I'd say no and no. NoNo. If the team was still on its downswing, rather than already having begun a rebuild, they still shouldn't be "several" years from contending. Even tearing the whole thing down to nothing doesn't take more than 2 years to contend (unless they continue to have Jets-level QBs). If they're seriously evaluating a young QB you don't feed him a team with Quincy Enunwa - with 1 year starting under his belt - as the most experienced receiver by a country mile. There's more to a team than getting immediate, live reps from the position that routinely takes among the longest to pan out anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powpow Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: If the team was still on its downswing, rather than already having begun a rebuild, they still shouldn't be "several" years from contending. Even tearing the whole thing down to nothing doesn't take more than 2 years to contend (unless they continue to have Jets-level QBs). If they're seriously evaluating a young QB you don't feed him a team with Quincy Enunwa - with 1 year starting under his belt - as the most experienced receiver by a country mile. There's more to a team than getting immediate, live reps from the position that routinely takes among the longest to pan out anyway. You gotta hit bottom before you bounce back. Keeping Decker is senseless. Clean house. I agree to hold him and trade him before the season. Good move. I just have zero faith that Mac plays Hack this coming season or that he has future plan for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Just now, Powpow said: You gotta hit bottom before you bounce back. Keeping Decker is senseless. Clean house. I agree to hold him and trade him before the season. Good move. I just have zero faith that Mac plays Hack this coming season or that he has future plan for him. No way in hell you get rid of Decker!!!!!!!!!!! Petty and Hackenberg need Decker and so do all the young WR's on this team. COME ON MAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Powpow said: You gotta hit bottom before you bounce back. Keeping Decker is senseless. Clean house. I agree to hold him and trade him before the season. Good move. I just have zero faith that Mac plays Hack this coming season or that he has future plan for him. OK, but I'll take that bet. The stage couldn't be more aptly set to throw Hackenberg out there, since we're not winning dick with Josh McCown anyway. I'll credit Maccagnan - and eventually, even Bowles - with knowing that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powpow Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: OK, but I'll take that bet. The stage couldn't be more aptly set to throw Hackenberg out there, since we're not winning dick with Josh McCown anyway. I'll credit Maccagnan - and eventually, even Bowles - with knowing that much. I personally would have just brought back Fitz instead of McGowan who I cant stand. But Fitz being Fitz wins 6 games easy. I'm in. Bring Hack in. Interesting though isn't it that Bill O'Brien traded down 15 spots to take Watson and probably never even considered talking to Mac about Hack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powpow Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 12 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: No way in hell you get rid of Decker!!!!!!!!!!! Petty and Hackenberg need Decker and so do all the young WR's on this team. COME ON MAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 18 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: No way in hell you get rid of Decker!!!!!!!!!!! Petty and Hackenberg need Decker and so do all the young WR's on this team. COME ON MAN Sure you do. He's expensive and injury prone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 1 hour ago, peebag said: Sure you do. He's expensive and injury prone. So you're in favor of another similar go round with the likes of Clyde Gates and David Nelson thats great lets throw Hackenberg or Petty to the wolves with an inexperienced group of unproven WRs..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 19 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: So you're in favor of another similar go round with the likes of Clyde Gates and David Nelson thats great lets throw Hackenberg or Petty to the wolves with an inexperienced group of unproven WRs..... Clyde Gates and Nelson don't make this team. But your point is right, Decker is going to play a role in us knowing if we have a qb or not and he's going to play a role in teaching our receivers what it takes improve their game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 1 hour ago, kdels62 said: Clyde Gates and Nelson don't make this team. But your point is right, Decker is going to play a role in us knowing if we have a qb or not and he's going to play a role in teaching our receivers what it takes improve their game. Whether Decker makes the team is up to him and the young QBs. If Decker is recovered and looks to be effective, AND the young QBs show the potential to be able to use him, Decker would be a valuable person to have on the team. But if Decker is not recovered, and the young QBs look completely useless, then the Jets should cut their losses, save the money for next year, and let Decker go. We will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Stacked alright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 We're not stacked (but she sure is). We have no real experience and proven vets at Wr except for Decker (and Q) it's rumored that Decker could be out. Plus he's coming off of an injury. The Jets have talent so we'll see how it goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 On 5/7/2017 at 1:04 PM, slats said: I'm pretty excited about this Stewart kid. I think he can be a top three receiver for the Jets this year. Same, seems more polished than the rest. 8 TDs in 54 receptions last year, in that offense too, is nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicg4360 Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 We will see Hackenberg don't worry about that. Go ahead let Bowles throw McCown out there...he has not managed to finish more than 11 games since his mid 20's and he's what 38 now lol. Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, nicg4360 said: We will see Hackenberg don't worry about that. Go ahead let Bowles throw McCown out there...he has not managed to finish more than 11 games since his mid 20's and he's what 38 now lol. Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app If it takes an injury to bench McCown then we are in deep crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicg4360 Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 If it takes an injury to bench McCown then we are in deep crap. I see your point...I think both Petty and Hackenberg will look better than McCown by the time preseason roles around. Well...we can be hopeful can't we? Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSteve Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 6 hours ago, Powpow said: You gotta hit bottom before you bounce back. Keeping Decker is senseless. Clean house. I agree to hold him and trade him before the season. Good move. I just have zero faith that Mac plays Hack this coming season or that he has future plan for him. No....you don't get rid of the only veteran receiver on the team when he has 5 rookies-1 year players to throw to at both WR and TE and a not-so-solid running game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powpow Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 46 minutes ago, CanadaSteve said: No....you don't get rid of the only veteran receiver on the team when he has 5 rookies-1 year players to throw to at both WR and TE and a not-so-solid running game. You don't but I do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSteve Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 17 hours ago, Powpow said: You don't but I do AND...that is why you are not a GM.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.