joewilly12 Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Packers News: LB Clay Matthews Agrees to Rams Contract After 10 Years in GB JOSEPH ZUCKERMARCH 19, 2019 Stacy Revere/Getty Images Veteran pass-rusher Clay Matthews agreed to a two-year contract with the Los Angeles Rams, the team announced Tuesday. Matthews took to Twitter to celebrate the news: The move ends a 10-year spell with the Green Bay Packers, who selected Matthews with the 26th overall pick of the 2009 draft. While the 32-year-old was one of the longest-tenured players on Green Bay's roster, his departure isn't all that surprising. He finished the 2018 season with 43 combined tackles and a career-low 3.5 sacks, which continues the downward trend of his overall performance. Matthews hasn't reached the Pro Bowl since 2015, having earned six Pro Bowl trips through his first seven seasons. Injuries have played a role in his decline. He battled a nagging shoulder problem along with ankle and hamstring injuries in 2016, when he missed four games and made only nine starts. A year later, he missed two games as a result of groin and hamstring issues. Last September, Packers beat writer Bob McGinn reported Green Bay was already preparing for a future without Matthews: "I'm told that the Green Bay Packers reached this conclusion some time ago. I'm also told that, if the season were to end today, they have no intention of re-signing Matthews after his contract expires at the end of the season." Matthews didn't give the Packers a compelling reason to change their minds over the rest of the campaign. In January, Pro Football Focus' Michael Renner noted edge-defender was Green Bay's biggest need this offseason: "While Nick Perry's contract is such that it might not make sense to cut him, he hasn't come close to justifying his big payday yet. He and Clay Matthews both finished 86th out of 109 qualifying edge defenders in pass-rushing productivity." ESPN.com's Rob Demovsky posited bringing Matthews back would have made sense were he to move back to inside linebacker, but Matthews always seemed to prefer playing on the outside. Perhaps Matthews will be motivated to prove the Packers wrong for letting him walk in free agency. Jordy Nelson carried a similar chip on his shoulder after he signed with the Oakland Raiders and proceeded to have a solid year before being cut this offseason. He caught 63 passes for 739 yards and three touchdowns. Regardless of whether revenge provides a source of inspiration of Matthews, the Rams are expecting him to bounce back in 2019. As a team, the Rams were 15th in sacks and 19th in adjusted sack rate, per Football Outsiders. An edge-rusher was among Los Angeles' needs heading into the offseason. The only question after this move is whether the team intends to have Matthews line up on the left side of the defense, which is where Dante Fowler Jr. primarily stayed during the second half of the 2018 season. The Rams signed Fowler to a one-year, $12 million deal, so he'll continue to occupy a key role for the team. Perhaps Los Angeles intends to move Matthews back to the inside, or maybe head coach Sean McVay simply sees him as a depth option behind Fowler and Samson Ebu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelenOfTroy Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Welcome back home, Clay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 I say whatevs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-met57 Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Makes sense it’s a win now team, veterans should be their cup of tea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASH1962 Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Yeah, great move. Jared Goff still sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 Dante Fowler and Clay Matthews not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.