HessStation Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 top 10 all time is still pretty great! Why do you guys get so upset? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 I don't have a dog in this fight, but maybe dumb statements like this "between the 5th and 10th" are the reason why. My list begins and ends with Larry Bird. I do not particularly care for Lebron. Especially, the soccer like dives when being brushed against. I get placing MJ ahead of him. I can understand, even though I do not necessarily agree, of placing Kareem ahead of him. I cannot see an argument for anyone else much less six other players. Even Bird. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 I hate the whole "Greatest of all time" argument. People who say this, do you know who Oscar Robertson is? Do you know anything about Wilt, about Kareem, about Bird? Same as, "Today's team would kill that team, it wouldn't even be a contest." What rules are you playing with? Can you imagine LeBron against the Bad Boys? If today's players are bigger, stronger, faster, better training, then why do they need so much time off? All you can say is, "This person was the best in his era". 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 23 hours ago, chirorob said: I hate the whole "Greatest of all time" argument. People who say this, do you know who Oscar Robertson is? Do you know anything about Wilt, about Kareem, about Bird? Same as, "Today's team would kill that team, it wouldn't even be a contest." What rules are you playing with? Can you imagine LeBron against the Bad Boys? If today's players are bigger, stronger, faster, better training, then why do they need so much time off? All you can say is, "This person was the best in his era". The GOAT conversation is damn near impossible because of era, positions, rule changes, etc. Hell, even golf you could argue Jack over Tiger even though I think even Jack agrees Tiger was clearly the most talented golfer of all time. The one sport that is the exception, is Basketball. Jordan was the GOAT and saying that is not a knock on Robertson, Wilt or Bird or any other all timer, Jordan was the best ever, doesn’t matter what generation, what era, Jordan would have still been Jordan and as great as all of of these guys were, they couldnt do what Jordan could do. Nobody ever had the total package like him and maybe never will and that’s ok, nothing wrong with the truth. He’s Jordan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 On 6/10/2024 at 9:59 AM, HessStation said: top 10 all time is still pretty great! Why do you guys get so upset? Sometimes, I think top 10 is generous. People forget how many times he just out right gave up on the court. sh*t these other dudes would never do. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggs Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 On 6/10/2024 at 2:49 PM, PFSIKH said: I don't have a dog in this fight, but maybe dumb statements like this "between the 5th and 10th" are the reason why. My list begins and ends with Larry Bird. I do not particularly care for Lebron. Especially, the soccer like dives when being brushed against. I get placing MJ ahead of him. I can understand, even though I do not necessarily agree, of placing Kareem ahead of him. I cannot see an argument for anyone else much less six other players. Even Bird. Disagree. I would put Bird and Magic ahead of him with MJ No. 1. Bill Russell is in the conversation, Kobe, Robertson, West. There's an argument to be made that Steph Curry was the most game changing player in the NBA while James was in his prime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 17 hours ago, Biggs said: Disagree. I would put Bird and Magic ahead of him with MJ No. 1. Bill Russell is in the conversation, Kobe, Robertson, West. There's an argument to be made that Steph Curry was the most game changing player in the NBA while James was in his prime. Good Points. Wherever you place Lebron, he "is in the conversation" after MJ. To start at 5 is disingenuous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 Elgin Baylor always gets ignored in these discussions because he was never able to get over the hump against Boston and no one respects the NBA of his era. But the dude still holds the record for the most points in an NBA Finals game (61) and averaged 27/14 in Finals games despite all those tough matchups with Boston. And only LeBron, Kobe, and Karl Malone had more 1st-team All-NBA selections than Elgin (10) and that was only because the former had much longer careers - Baylor was only in the NBA a total of 14 seasons. As a scorer he was Jordan before Jordan and would have been elite in any era. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperPitch Posted Monday at 03:35 PM Share Posted Monday at 03:35 PM It’s tough because LeBron fans want him to be the GOAT, not just top 5-10. Anything less feels like a letdown compared to the hype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted Monday at 04:51 PM Share Posted Monday at 04:51 PM On 6/20/2024 at 8:52 AM, Jetsfan80 said: Elgin Baylor always gets ignored in these discussions because he was never able to get over the hump against Boston and no one respects the NBA of his era. But the dude still holds the record for the most points in an NBA Finals game (61) and averaged 27/14 in Finals games despite all those tough matchups with Boston. And only LeBron, Kobe, and Karl Malone had more 1st-team All-NBA selections than Elgin (10) and that was only because the former had much longer careers - Baylor was only in the NBA a total of 14 seasons. As a scorer he was Jordan before Jordan and would have been elite in any era. To add to the argument, there was lot less teams in the NBA during that time. Expansion really watered down the competition. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted Monday at 05:47 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:47 PM 55 minutes ago, peebag said: To add to the argument, there was lot less teams in the NBA during that time. Expansion really watered down the competition. For a time, definitely. But the international expansion of the game has made rosters more talented top-to-bottom than ever before. The quality of the game still sucks but there's never been more talented basketball players per team than there are right now and it'll only get better in that respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsfaninNorthHollywood Posted yesterday at 02:19 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:19 AM 10 hours ago, SuperPitch said: It’s tough because LeBron fans want him to be the GOAT, not just top 5-10. Anything less feels like a letdown compared to the hype. I haven't followed the nba in years, but LeBron fan boys are often more delusional than the Brady Bunch. Or our own Brocktologists during draft time. I digress though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.