Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 You're right. He was better. He might not have been celebrated as much because he isn't a pass catching threat, but he is what a running should be: Big Strong Tough Able to take it 20-30 times each every Sunday Reggie Bush is no running back, he is a scatback, the same thing McFadden will be. We already have one of those (Leon Washington), why the want for another? I agree that Peterson should have gotten more publicity than Bush, but coming out of College people had christined him to be the next Barry Sanders, things change though. McFadden may not be quite the prospect Peterson was, he still could be one hell of an NFL RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 See-through? That's not a color is it. I was wondering why i've been getting so many weird looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Did somebody really just call McFadden a scat back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Did somebody really just call McFadden a scat back? He sure as hell isn't a true running back. If you are thinking he is, then I question you big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 I was wondering why i've been getting so many weird looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 You're right. He was better. He might not have been celebrated as much because he isn't a pass catching threat, but he is what a running should be: Big Strong Tough Able to take it 20-30 times each every Sunday Reggie Bush is no running back, he is a scatback, the same thing McFadden will be. We already have one of those (Leon Washington), why the want for another? Is mcFadden a Scatback???? 6'2 215lbs Not really the physique of a scatback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Is mcFadden a Scatback???? 6'2 215lbs Not really the physique of a scatback. There is no way he is 215. Much closer to 200lbs. He is not a pure running back, it is laughable to think so. He also folds against better opponents, something a lot of people here always hated about Curtis Martin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He sure as hell isn't a true running back. If you are thinking he is, then I question you big time. Peterson - 6'1, 217lbs McFadden - 6'2 215lbs They are very similar physically with mcFadden probably getting the edge in speed. He is not a scatback 124, IMO he will be a great NFL RB. Whether its with the Jets or not I really think he will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Peterson - 6'1, 217lbs McFadden - 6'2 215lbs They are very similar physically with mcFadden probably getting the edge in speed. He is not a scatback 124, IMO he will be a great NFL RB. Whether its with the Jets or not I really think he will. Peterson is more closer to 230 and McFadden 200. Trust me, McFadden is nothing special. He folds faster than a lawn chair. Would be a complete waste for the Jets to select him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 There is no way he is 215. Much closer to 200lbs. He is not a pure running back, it is laughable to think so. He also folds against better opponents, something a lot of people here always hated about Curtis Martin. He's listed as that, he looks like it too IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Peterson is more closer to 230 and McFadden 200. Trust me, McFadden is nothing special. He folds faster than a lawn chair. Would be a complete waste for the Jets to select him. LOL, we'll see. This may be an interesting arguement in 2 or 3 years, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He sure as hell isn't a true running back. If you are thinking he is, then I question you big time. You are so wrong on this one, its not even funny. McFadden is a big time back. He's at least 215, probably more. Scat back? LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Peterson is more closer to 230 and McFadden 200. Trust me, McFadden is nothing special. He folds faster than a lawn chair. Would be a complete waste for the Jets to select him. you have to be a tool to post this crap a scatback... biggest joke on the board this kid is better than LJ and has no tude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He's listed as that, he looks like it too IMO. If you really believe the weight listing for players, you need to get your head checked! Every single player ever examined is off by 10 or so pounds either more or less. I find it funny when I read that Leon Washington weighs 202lbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 you have to be a tool to post this crap a scatback... biggest joke on the board this kid is better than LJ and has no tude Bahahahaha. You sir are a fool. Darren McFadden will not ever sniff the jock of Larry Johnson or Adrian Peterson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I see McFadden and Peterson, whats your point? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 You are so wrong on this one, its not even funny. McFadden is a big time back. He's at least 215, probably more. Scat back? LOL. He is nowhere near 215. 210 at MOST. Do you also believe Leon Washington is 202lbs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 assmop, IrishJet and barton .. enjoy McNothing. He won't ever be in a New York Jet uniform, and I can only thank the gods that he won't. Thomas Jones & Leon Washington are here to stay. McOverrated will be some place else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 assmop, IrishJet and barton .. enjoy McNothing. He won't ever be in a New York Jet uniform, and I can only thank the gods that he won't. Thomas Jones & Leon Washington are here to stay. McOverrated will be some place else. Like I said 124, this will be fun in 2 or 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Like I said 124, this will be fun in 2 or 3 years. Yes it will. When, ya know, Adrian Peterson is the best back in the league besides LaDainain Tomlinson and Darren McFadden is struggling for playing time. A smaller Cedric Benson anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 While you all have wet dreams about McFadden people like me and 124 will be praying we don't do the dumb thing you want and draft him. I don't know enough about him i'll be the first to admit it. But running back is not our biggest need. Nor are second biggest need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Yes it will. When, ya know, Adrian Peterson is the best back in the league besides LaDainain Tomlinson and Darren McFadden is struggling for playing time.A smaller Cedric Benson anyone? I would be willing to bet all my money that McFadden will be a good if not great NFL back, we'll see though. All will be revealed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He is nowhere near 215. 210 at MOST. Do you also believe Leon Washington is 202lbs? So because he's say 215 or 210, he's a scat back? Was Curtis Martin also a scat back because he weighed that much? How about Tomlinson? Watch HIS GAME. He's not a scatback at all. The guy runs through tackles and over people all game long. He's a beast. It really does not matter if he weights 210 or 225, his game is huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 While you all have wet dreams about McFadden people like me and 124 will be praying we don't do the dumb thing you want and draft him. I don't know enough about him i'll be the first to admit it. But running back is not our biggest need. Nor are second biggest need. We need a slot receiver more than we need a freakin' running back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jets rooter Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 don't despair jet fans.this only shows that the current jet brass are incompetent.a perfect example is last years draft.with all the picks that the jets had the last draft.they could have built a better defense.take kansas city for example.they drafted defensve players that are starting.when the jets said that the draft was mediocre.it makes me wonder where this current jet leadership is thinking as far as building for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I would be willing to bet all my money that McFadden will be a good if not great NFL back, we'll see though. All will be revealed. Bring it on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Peterson - 6'1, 217lbs McFadden - 6'2 215lbs They are very similar physically with mcFadden probably getting the edge in speed. He is not a scatback 124, IMO he will be a great NFL RB. Whether its with the Jets or not I really think he will. There isn't a chance McFadden has the edge in speed, Peterson ran a 4.37 last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 So because he's say 215 or 210, he's a scat back? Was Curtis Martin also a scat back because he weighed that much? How about Tomlinson? Watch HIS GAME. He's not a scatback at all. The guy runs through tackles and over people all game long. He's a beast. It really does not matter if he weights 210 or 225, his game is huge. LOL exactly!!!! Have you ever seen the kid pull a stiff arm???? He is a beast, a beast with speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 We need a slot receiver more than we need a freakin' running back. We need a whole new f'n Defense. 124 pm me your f'n number, i'm going to finally come meet up with you on Sunday. I'll be hard to miss, ill be wearing my Thomas Jones jersey with a paper bag over my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 There isn't a chance McFadden has the edge in speed, Peterson ran a 4.37 last year. McFadden runs a 4.3 too I heard anyways. We'll see at the combine. My guess is he will get a 4.3 time. I've seen him in the clear, that guy has wheels!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 LOL exactly!!!! Have you ever seen the kid pull a stiff arm???? He is a beast, a beast with speed. Remeber that Thomas Jones stiff arm against the Dolphins? Adrian Peterson would've flung that f'er right into Section 124. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 We need a slot receiver more than we need a freakin' running back. When a slot reciever gains 30 odd yrds in a game its okay. When your #1 RB is gaining 30 odd yrds in a game, it is not!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Also I'm just going to say if we draft f*cking overrated McFadden over Chris Long I will kill somebody. Did nobody watch the Virginia game this weekend? Chris Long absolutley dominated he will be amazing as a DE for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Also I'm just going to say if we draft f*cking overrated McFadden over Chris Long I will kill somebody. Did nobody watch the Virginia game this weekend? Chris Long absolutley dominated he will be amazing as a DE for us. No because like someone said he is too small to be a dominant 3-4 end. If we draft another undersized defender in that front 4 I will lose it. We need size on D, Long doesnt give us that!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.