timbok Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 ok which is our biggest weakness... our pass defense or the run defense..and should we have picked another player other then revis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Run defense is clearly a bigger weakness, but the poll is flawed. It makes the assumption that another available player would have had as great of an impact on the rush-defense that Revis should have on the pass-defense. It's not like Jamal Williams (or even Adam Carriker) was on the board just waiting for us to grab him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 My real problem is trading up to the spot AFTER Carriker was picked. Seemed that with all we gave up we'd be better off with Carriker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 My real problem is trading up to the spot AFTER Carriker was picked. Seemed that with all we gave up we'd be better off with Carriker. Carriker is a solid pick, and he will be good, he won't ever be great. With Revis, he has a chance to be the next Ty Law, the sky is the limit with a quality corner. then again, corners have a high bust factor, I still think we made the right pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timbok Posted May 26, 2007 Author Share Posted May 26, 2007 I hope... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Where is the all of the above selection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Run d was a big need, but with moving up for Revis, I don't know why we didn't go a few more spots for Carriker. Unless we couldn't get a partner or they wanted too much. I am happy with the Revis pick. He was one of the top cb rated. However, he was expensive to get and he better not be a bust. If he is the next law then it was worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Run defense, most definately. They did improve a little, but in comparrison to early in the year, its not hard to improve lol. If Revis is anything close to what he could be, you add him to Dyson and Rhodes and you've got 3 very good guys back in that secondary, plus whatever Coleman/Coleman/E. Smith can contribute...should be a solid secondary in my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Where is the all of the above selection? It's in the "What JN mod did PFSIKH have homosexual relations with" thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryno the Jet Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Where is the all of the above selection? LMAO :ha: I voted tat the secondary needed Revis and I stand by that. Harris is a great addition too and I think that both picks were great. Keep in mind the run D has been solidified a tad with Coleman at DE too. I do think a big gut at NT would be nice during obvious run sits to give DROB a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.