joebabyny Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 For the record, if I was allowed to, I would definitely post on ji. Not every day but I would post a lot. I would even accept a limited account that had posting rights with no PM ability. And that is why you are a marketing genius. The funny thing is, Sooth really created the monster that is JN, and not so much by just kicking you guys out. If I really cared to give away free advice (which I don't) I could explain a number of ways why this feud and the way he treats this place allows JN to flourish. But whatever, Max is a good guy and everyone knows it so someone's folly is his gain, and for once the good guy comes out on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 I get ticked big time when Jetswin comes over here defending his bannings. It's not fair to JN and especially Max.Max isn't even allowed to post over there at all let alone defend a JN banning. Max is just a great guy and lets it go. He's a much bigger man than any any of them at JI. Dude, trust me, this behavior is all for the greater good of this place, please please please let them continue to perpetuate this feud, it only helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 And that is why you are a marketing genius. The funny thing is, Sooth really created the monster that is JN, and not so much by just kicking you guys out. If I really cared to give away free advice (which I don't) I could explain a number of ways why this feud and the way he treats this place allows JN to flourish. But whatever, Max is a good guy and everyone knows it so someone's folly is his gain, and for once the good guy comes out on top. I do agree, if he embraced JN early on, this site would have failed. Ironic but true. Now I don't think it matters so much. But he has seemed to learn that he should just blast us in private. The public stuff only seems to help us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 I do agree, if he embraced JN early on, this site would have failed. Ironic but true. Now I don't think it matters so much. But he has seemed to learn that he should just blast us in private. The public stuff only seems to help us. oh it still matters in a few ways, whatever, at this point ya can't just put the sh#t back in the horse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 I do agree, if he embraced JN early on, this site would have failed. Ironic but true. Now I don't think it matters so much. But he has seemed to learn that he should just blast us in private. The public stuff only seems to help us. You mean like privately in the JI mod forum? Didn't I see some screen caps floating around someplace? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 oh it still matters in a few ways, whatever, at this point ya can't just put the sh#t back in the horse. I meant if they changed course and got things right going forward, it wouldn't matter. JN is here to stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 I meant if they changed course and got things right going forward, it wouldn't matter. JN is here to stay. oh yeah, you are right about that, unless you let all the pancake syrup go to your head, hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 You mean like privately in the JI mod forum? Didn't I see some screen caps floating around someplace? Not that Sooth needs me to speak for him, but I an tell you this.....I cannot even recall the last time I saw JN mentioned in the Mod forum on JI. It will continue to pain me to no end that this split exists. Not that there are two sites, I actually think having multiple good fan sites is good for fandom and the team, but the split in fans themselves and some having ill will towards other fellow fans based primarily where they post on the interweb. And yes, I see examples of that on both sites, sadly. But I assure you, one day Max, Jetswin, Smizz and I will all elope to Maui and form the first ever quadrangle-marriage, and all will be forgiven and we'll live in a wonderful post-division world of fan utopia, and all will be well, and all will be well indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 He doesn't defend the bannings as much as he explains them. He doesn't come over here to start anything, that's why I have no problem with him. And, through past experience, he explains things through PMs. I understand Max should be able to post there but it's not like he would anyways (don't want to put words in his mouth, but I don't think it bothers him much...). Jetswin lets it go fine but when people ask for explanations, he supplies them.[/QUOTE] Not sure if I'm understanding this the way you intended but, to me , following a poster over here is NOT " letting it go". If he minded his own business and stayed at *********** , IMO, THAT would be letting it go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Dude, trust me, this behavior is all for the greater good of this place, please please please let them continue to perpetuate this feud, it only helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Not sure if I'm understanding this the way you intended but, to me , following a poster over here is NOT " letting it go". If he minded his own business and stayed at *********** , IMO, THAT would be letting it go. When people are confused about why they were banned over on JI, and he sees that on JN, he will PM an explanation. It's doing what they asked for. That's not following a poster over here, it's rendering that poster a service. He doesn't do it to harm anyone and you're the only person that's bothered by it, so I don't see where the issue is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 When people are confused about why they were banned over on JI, and he sees that on JN, he will PM an explanation. It's doing what they asked for. That's not following a poster over here, it's rendering that poster a service. He doesn't do it to harm anyone and you're the only person that's bothered by it, so I don't see where the issue is. Those guys should just stay over there. Both the mods and the people bitching about being banned. It's old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Those guys should just stay over there. Both the mods and the people bitching about being banned. It's old. I don't think the people bitching can stay over there...they just shouldn't whine about it over here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 I don't think the people bitching can stay over there...they just shouldn't whine about it over here. They can't help but whining and crying. OMG! I got banned because I'm too stupid to follow rules feel bad for me. My ban is up, bye! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borgoguy Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 They can't help but whining and crying. OMG! I got banned because I'm too stupid to follow rules feel bad for me. My ban is up, bye! That's why there should be a post minimum before you earn the right to start threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 That's why there should be a post minimum before you earn the right to start threads. 50 seems like a fair number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borgoguy Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 50 seems like a fair number. I had 100 in mind. That way, you exclude all the spammers, and disgruntled folks who have been banned. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 I had 100 in mind. That way, you exclude all the spammers, and disgruntled folks who have been banned. Just my opinion. Sounds good to me. Max, get on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Not sure if I'm understanding this the way you intended but, to me , following a poster over here is NOT " letting it go". If he minded his own business and stayed at *********** , IMO, THAT would be letting it go. Speaking of "letting it go", it's time for you to do so. JW is a good guy and is allowed to post here whenever he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 They can't help but whining and crying. OMG! I got banned because I'm too stupid to follow rules feel bad for me. My ban is up, bye! So you're whining and crying about people whining and crying? Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Sounds good to me. Max, get on it. That will never happen, I promise you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Why can't we all just get along? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Why can't we all just get along? Because we're all *******s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Because we're all *******s. Oh, that's right. Sorry, I forgot. **** those guys at JI!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borgoguy Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 That will never happen, I promise you. Why not, as the current system has a flaw? What's wrong with earning the right to start threads? You may post, just not initiate threads until you have attained a certain number of posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 So you're whining and crying about people whining and crying? Got it. Making a single post expressing my dissatisfaction over something in a mocking and derisive tone =! whining and crying. Lets just say I were to accept your faulty logic, which I am not, I could easily respond with your pee wee hermanesque post right back at you. You are whining and crying about someone whining and crying about a third party whining and crying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Why not, as the current system has a flaw? What's wrong with earning the right to start threads? You may post, just not initiate threads until you have attained a certain number of posts. It's a flaw in your view, not in Maxie's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Why not, as the current system has a flaw? What's wrong with earning the right to start threads? You may post, just not initiate threads until you have attained a certain number of posts. I think the ability to start threads should be assigned randomly by the administrator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Making a single post expressing my dissatisfaction over something in a mocking and derisive tone =! whining and crying. Lets just say I were to accept your faulty logic, which I am not, I could easily respond with your pee wee hermanesque post right back at you. You are whining and crying about someone whining and crying about a third party whining and crying. Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 It's a flaw in your view, not in Maxie's. Who died and made you Max's plenipotentiary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Who died and made you Max's plenipotentiary? That's a big word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borgoguy Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 It's a flaw in your view, not in Maxie's. No one mentioned Max. I am talking about the system. By your logic, a flaw in computer software should remain because the boss thought of it. By putting a posting number before one may start threads, you virtually eliminate spammers and all this JI vs JN bullcrap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 No one mentioned Max. I am talking about the system. By your logic, a flaw in computer software should remain because the boss thought of it. By putting a posting number before one may start threads, you virtually eliminate spammers and all this JI vs JN bullcrap. You're never going to eliminate the JI vs. JN stuff. Not for nothing Boro, but I seem to remember you starting one of these threads some time ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 That's a big word. It is one of my favorite words. Too bad it isn't used much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 It is one of my favorite words. Too bad it isn't used much. It is a very good word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.