JustInFudge Posted January 20, 2011 Author Share Posted January 20, 2011 Bullsh*t. Look at the stats. You acted like the only reason that Braylon wasn't "top 10" was a lack of targets. He is 32 in targets and he's 55 in receptions. His yardage and TD totals are better - around 25, but you dismiss Dwayne Bowe and claim the guy is even with Roddy White. Roddy White caught 10% more of the balls he was targeted with and he was targeted more often. Maybe he's better than Santana Moss, but that's not clear either. Look at the numbers, they don't lie. The guy did have a monster game Sunday. Let him keep it up. I guess that kind of answers the question I asked above...but you dont think that Sanchez being wildly inaccurate all year long factors into why he has a ton of targets with low receptions in comparison? Its not that far off of what Holmes did too. Very similar target to reception ratio. I'm not trying to make a case for either in the top 10...but I dont think those statistics should be looked into very hard considering the play of their QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Okay Rex Ryan. I'm glad that Tannebaum is doing the contracts and not you. I'm sure that more than 10 WR had more game changing catches than Braylon Edwards. Ok Bill Belichick I get it you dont like Braylon Edwards. Some of you are unreal and need to get your heads out of your asses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Okay Rex Ryan. I'm glad that Tannebaum is doing the contracts and not you. I'm sure that more than 10 WR had more game changing catches than Braylon Edwards. But how many dragged two pro-bowlers (LOL) into the end zone from 7 yards out? Don't they have an official stat for that? They should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Bottom line....WHERE IS WES WELKER RIGHT NOW? HOME WATCHING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 20, 2011 Author Share Posted January 20, 2011 See my post below yours. Look at the numbers it's not hard. What criteria do you want to use? You'd need some convoluted combo of experience, age, ypc to make it work. He's not in the top 20 in catches or yards. His percentage of targets caught is bad. His TD numbers are fairly good, but some guys patently dismissed by visa (Dwayne Bowe) obliterate his numbers there. The guy had a season comparable to Johnny Knox and Mario Manningham. Are they top 10? You could make the case that Sanchez keeps his numbers down, but the Jets running game and line have to trend his numbers upward. The simple fact is that "top 10 WR" usually aren't out of the top 20 in every statistical category. Again, I dont think he's a top 10 WR...but like I said above. I dont think that reception to targets is fair when assessing Holmes and his play because Sanchez is inaccurate. No, he's not. Do you really have to ruin the lolWelker thread by inciting jetfan on jetfan violence? This. Back on track here. Welker is a JAG. I'd take all of our WR's over him, including Brad Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Want I should fight with visa again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Any thread here with another teams players or names ruins it for themselves. Braylon Edwards is better than Wes Welker there you got your Welker thread back. i think most of us can agree that this thread has taught us 1) Welker isn't top 10 receiver 2) Neither is Edwards 3) Jif smokes pole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Hold on now people, let's get this damn thread back on track. WELKAH FECKIN' SUCKS!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 i think most of us can agree that this thread has taught us 1) Welker isn't top 10 receiver 2) Neither is Edwards 3) Jif smokes pole I think most of us can agree that none of those were things that really needed to be taught to anyone paying any attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Want I should fight with visa again? Bring it this time you better pack a lunch and an overnight bag. Why all the hate for Braylon Edwards? DAM some of you Jet fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Ok Bill Belichick I get it you dont like Braylon Edwards. Some of you are unreal and need to get your heads out of your asses. Actually I love Braylon Edwards, but apparently the view from in my a$$ is more clear from the view from Braylon Edward's a$$ where your head must be squarely planted. Just because we have very good players doesn't make them top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I think most of us can agree that none of those were things that really needed to be taught to anyone paying any attention. lol.. this is true, but I really wanted to fit the more you know gif in there somehow.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Hold on now people, let's get this damn thread back on track. WELKAH FECKIN' SUCKS!!!! Okay. I'm sorry. I'm back on board. That little ****er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Actually I love Braylon Edwards, but apparently the view from in my a$$ is more clear from the view from Braylon Edward's a$$ where your head must be squarely planted. Just because we have very good players doesn't make them top 10. Listen for what its worth. I dont give a rats a$$ what you think or what you see from in your a$$. In my opinion Braylon is a top 10 WR and hes alot better than Wes frikken Welker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Listen for what its worth. I dont give a rats a$$ what you think or what you see from in your a$$. In my opinion Braylon is a top 10 WR and hes alot better than Wes frikken Welker. your 1/2 right. Which is 100% better then normal gold star! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Again, I dont think he's a top 10 WR...but like I said above. I dont think that reception to targets is fair when assessing Holmes and his play because Sanchez is inaccurate. This. Back on track here. Welker is a JAG. I'd take all of our WR's over him, including Brad Smith. Agreed and repped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 What are the chances the Patsy trolls or Welker blow hards touch this thread? A Randy Moss blowhard started it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 20, 2011 Author Share Posted January 20, 2011 Hold on now people, let's get this damn thread back on track. WELKAH FECKIN' SUCKS!!!! Thank you. I honestly would put Welker on my top 3 most overrated players in the history of the NFL list. Total JAG. And I still love how not a single Welker blow hard or a Patsy troll has touched this thread, even though I've seen them lurking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 20, 2011 Author Share Posted January 20, 2011 A Randy Moss blowhard started it. Right on time. Randy Moss = 2nd greatest WR to play the game. Welker = JAG Next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Bring it this time you better pack a lunch and an overnight bag. Why all the hate for Braylon Edwards? DAM some of you Jet fans. You really are delusional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 your 1/2 right. Which is 100% better then normal gold star! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I'm glad you asked. This link makes this thread even more epic in revealing the JAG that is Welker. http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/receiving/sort/receivingTargets/seasontype/2 Too funny. If you divide Welkers receptions by his targets it equates to a 70% catch ratio. .017 Edwards is about 50%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 your 1/2 right. Which is 100% better then normal gold star! He's usually 1/4 right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Right on time. Randy Moss = 2nd greatest WR to play the game. Welker = JAG Next How do you explain Welker being ranked the 19 best WR in the NFL coming off reconstructive knee surgery? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 How do you explain Welker being ranked the 19 best WR in the NFL coming off reconstructive knee surgery? He has stats in games he does not play in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 He's usually 1/4 right? I got your 1/4 right here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 He has stats in games he does not play in? Are the Yankees still cheating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Are the Yankees still cheating? How many times do you want me to humiliate you with the same sh*t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I got your 1/4 right here. Stop making gaytriot jealous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 How many times do you want me to humiliate you with the same sh*t? Hilarious By your own admission youre a Yankees fan who hates cheating. Too funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Stop making gaytriot jealous! Visa, Jellyroll wants to know where you live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 How do you explain Welker being ranked the 19 best WR in the NFL coming off reconstructive knee surgery? So by your admission there were 18 other WRs coming off reconstructive knee surgery that were better than Welker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Are the Yankees still cheating? What does Baseball have to do with football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Hilarious By your own admission youre a Yankees fan who hates cheating. Too funny. Right, so we eliminate all the tainted titles and it leaves my team with a ton and yours on almost a 100 year drought. Hilarious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Umm, can we please stay on topic? Wes Welker - worthless POS JAG: discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.