Jump to content
Want to remove all ads? ×

Murder at Midnight Mafia Game Thread (Day 4) [Game Over; Town Wins!]

Spoot-Face

By Spoot-Face
in Mafia Game Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Spoot-Face

Spoot-Face

Posted
  • Author
Posted

********OFFICIAL VOTECOUNT********

Stark -- JC, Drums, 80, Barry, Greenseed (5)

Ape -- CTM (1)

JC -- JiF, JETS (2)

JETS -- Crusher (1)

Drums -- Stark (1)

Crusher -- Ape (1)

Greenseed -- jvill (1)

 

With 12 people alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Spoot-Face
Spoot-Face

Murder at Midnight Mafia I posit to you this one question: Where do criminals go when they can no longer hide in the shadows? If you venture out beyond the safety of the sprawling metr

Spoot-Face
Spoot-Face

Ape before investigating Jif's butt:   Ape after investigating Jif's butt:

CTM
CTM

Posted Images

Spoot-Face

Spoot-Face

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, CTM said:

no edit rule sucks, i thought we dispensed with that pedantic crap when the lawyer stopped playing

I have been questioning whether or not it's too strict of a rule. I've always made it a point never to do it myself, but perhaps I shouldn't be forcing that on other people. I made the rule to avoid situations where someone edits a post to alter a vote, fix a slip-up, or otherwise retroactively alter their gameplay in a way that's out of the spirit of the game. Admittedly, as far as I remember, someone has only edited a post to alter a vote twice (Greenseed now, which appears wholly innocent, and Pac to add his unvote in post deadline, so his vote counted because he thinks unvoting is dumb.) In my time here I can't recall anyone editing for any of those other reasons I mentioned.

Perhaps the rule is unnecessary, and, should anyone start to abuse the edit function in a dishonest way, we can adjust then and start enforcing the rule.

If enough people want me to, I can abolish the rule. My only intention is to protect the integrity of the game, but maybe I'm not giving people enough credit here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CTM

CTM

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Spoot-Face said:

I have been questioning whether or not it's too strict of a rule. I've always made it a point never to do it myself, but perhaps I shouldn't be forcing that on other people. I made the rule to avoid situations where someone edits a post to alter a vote, fix a slip-up, or otherwise retroactively alter their gameplay in a way that's out of the spirit of the game. Admittedly, as far as I remember, someone has only edited a post to alter a vote twice (Greenseed now, which appears wholly innocent, and Pac to add his unvote in post deadline, so his vote counted because he thinks unvoting is dumb.) In my time here I can't recall anyone editing for any of those other reasons I mentioned.

Perhaps the rule is unnecessary, and, should anyone start to abuse the edit function in a dishonest way, we can adjust then and start enforcing the rule.

If enough people want me to, I can abolish the rule. My only intention is to protect the integrity of the game, but maybe I'm not giving people enough credit here.

My position is the rule is heavy handed, does little to acheive its stated goal, and not really enforceable systematically. Without mod powers it still requires someone to catch the edit in real time. Theres no way that I know of to see which post was edited after the fact.. Then if caught the edit couldve been innocuous or suspicious, without mod powers you cant tell.  A blanket rule would modkill either which to me is game breaking.

Better if an edit is caught to let the players chew on it.. imo

Btw I wasnt expecting anything more than rule 14 as a response, and while I appreciate your lengthy explanation you should probably respond to this with rule 14 and do what you want. It's not really a big deal 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Integrity28

Integrity28

Posted
Posted

Let the people edit.

If you’re editing posts as a means of manipulating game play, the gfy.

Somebod us use it just to fix fat fingering. I also sometime hit submit and then realize I have more to say - I will sometime add insults to a previous post. Only if it’s like right then. If time had passed, then no.

Its not hard to self-police and play ethically.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JiFtheOracle

JiFtheOracle

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Spoot-Face said:

True story: once after he randomly downvoted a funny post of yours, I made a joke about him and tagged him. He then sent me an expletive-laced PM calling me a "f*cking d*ckhead".

Suffiice to say, I think he'd be perfect for Mafia.

 

14 hours ago, The Crusher said:

He’s pm’d me too but to just ask how am I doing and wishing me the best. 

 

14 hours ago, Drums said:

He pm’d me too to ask if I had Herman Munster in my avatar when I was rocking a Boris Karloff avatar. 

We have an ongoing PM, it fun.  Each message is new picture of one of us dressing our penis in funny costumes.  . 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company

Site Sponsor

MetLife Stadium Tailgate

NY Jets Podcast

NY Jets Podcast

DMCA Page

  • -- DMCA Page
    • ×
    ×
    • Create New...