madmike1 Posted October 19, 2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 I promise you, nothing will make you look smart. Ever. Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted October 19, 2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away. Yet you've been proved completely wrong on Beckett. Now the sample size must be extended until you somehow feel you are correct because you are too small to man up and admit that the guy is pressure game money in the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 19, 2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away. Just like you were right about Welker? You're a running joke on the board. Keep up the good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 madmike, beckett is one of the top 5 playoff pitchers of this generation mariano rivera john smoltz curt schilling orlando hernandez josh beckett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Yet you've been proved completely wrong on Beckett. Now the sample size must be extended until you somehow feel you are correct because you are too small to man up and admit that the guy is pressure game money in the bank. If this was a yankee pitcher coming off of a career year after a mediocre career i doubt all the met/sox fans on this board would be lapping him to this extent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Just like you were right about Welker? You're a running joke on the board. Keep up the good work. I was right about Welker, I have no problem being a joke to a troll like you, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I was right about Welker, I have no problem being a joke to a troll like you, madmike, what are you trying to win here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I was right about Welker, I have no problem being a joke to a troll like you, You were right about Welker? Can you please explain to me how you came to this conclusion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 You were right about Welker? Can you please explain to me how you came to this conclusion? Welker is nowhere near worth what your cheating franchise paid for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Welker is nowhere near worth what your cheating franchise paid for him. So you've changed your tune? I thought you said he sucked and now you are saying he is overpaid? His 38 receptions for 386 yards and 3TD's tell me he is earning his paycheck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 So you've changed your tune? I thought you said he sucked and now you are saying he is overpaid? His 38 receptions for 386 yards and 3TD's tell me he is earning his paycheck. I never said anything different from that. This is the BASEBALL forum. I'll be talking baseball here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I never said anything different from that. This is the BASEBALL forum. I'll be talking baseball here. So you are only right in the baseball forum? Is that what you were trying to say with this statement: Originally Posted by madmike1 Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 madmike = fish out of water welkers been amazing this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 So you are only right in the baseball forum? Is that what you were trying to say with this statement:Actually i'm right most of the time but trolls like you will never see that reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Actually i'm right most of the time but trolls like you will never see that reality. I maybe a troll according to you but there are plenty of Yankees, Mets & Jets fans here who agree with me. If you actually admitted when you were wrong people might stop making fun of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I maybe a troll according to you but there are plenty of Yankees, Mets & Jets fans here who agree with me. If you actually admitted when you were wrong people might stop making fun of you. I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Actually i'm right most of the time but trolls like you will never see that reality. The truth just called. It is laughing at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless. I'm clueless? You said that Beckett is a 3rd starter. That's comedy gold right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I'm clueless? You said that Beckett is a 3rd starter. That's comedy gold right there. What I said was that BEFORE THIS SEASON his CAREER numbers were at that level. Sorry if you as a boston homer can't see that reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 What I said was that BEFORE THIS SEASON his CAREER numbers were at that level. Sorry if you as a boston homer can't see that reality. Somer people actually watch baseball, rather than just look at numbers. That is one of a plethora of your problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 What I said was that BEFORE THIS SEASON his CAREER numbers were at that level. Sorry if you as a boston homer can't see that reality. And, BTW, looking at Philip Hughes' NUMBERS say that he will be a midle of a rotation guy, rather than a HOF type that you indicated he is. Just reading the numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless. I thought you were never ever ever ever gonna come back into this evil baseball forum that's occupied by Scott Dierking? What happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 And, BTW, looking at Philip Hughes' NUMBERS say that he will be a midle of a rotation guy, rather than a HOF type that you indicated he is. Just reading the numbers Didn't you see that Hughes has had over 300 innings in the minors? Thats a huge sample size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless. you claim to be a numbers guy and dismiss Beckett in the playoffs?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I thought you were never ever ever ever gonna come back into this evil baseball forum that's occupied by Scott Dierking? What happened? I put my stalker on ignore. Not that he was the reason I left anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 you claim to be a numbers guy and dismiss Beckett in the playoffs?? His numbers over his career mean much more than 8 starts. And that goes for any player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I put my stalker on ignore. Not that he was the reason I left anyway. Translation-Madmike can't have a normal discussion with people without resorting to name calling and lashing out. The putting on ignore is a knee jerk reaction to having to lsiten to someone elses opionions, who just not might jive with Mike's. That is a foreign concept to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 His numbers over his career mean much more than 8 starts. And that goes for any player. and those numbers still indicate that he's a solid pitcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 and those numbers still indicate that he's a solid pitcher He's been great in the playoffs but there is no circumstance where i would value 8 starts over a player's career numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He's been great in the playoffs but there is no circumstance where i would value 8 starts over a player's career numbers. http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/beckejo02.shtml his ERA is 16 points above the league average, .597 winning %, three straight years with 15 wins or more he's not dominant. he'll never be Roger, Randy, Pedro or Greg but he's damn good and wins twice as many games with the Sox than he loses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/beckejo02.shtml his ERA is 16 points above the league average, .597 winning %, three straight years with 15 wins or more he's not dominant. he'll never be Roger, Randy, Pedro or Greg but he's damn good and wins twice as many games with the Sox than he loses. a 116 ERA+ is around a no 3 starter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 His numbers over his career mean much more than 8 starts. And that goes for any player. He had a bad year in 2006. As you talk so much about his numbers I suggest you take a look at the link blackout provided in his post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 a 116 ERA+ is around a no 3 starter... so Nolan Ryan was a career #3 starter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 a 116 ERA+ is around a no 3 starter... Do you even watch the games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He had a bad year in 2006. As you talk so much about his numbers I suggest you take a look at the link blackout provided in his post. I've seen his numbers. I wouldn't talk about a player if i didn't take a look at their numbers. His numbers before last season were just ok. Not great not awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.