DonCorleone Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 Eduardo also work under the Schott? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Jet Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 Eduardo also work under the Schott? Yes. I'm pretty sure Marty was his NFL coaching mentor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonCorleone Posted January 15, 2007 Author Share Posted January 15, 2007 Yes. I'm pretty sure Marty was his NFL coaching mentor. Thanks Lady Jet. That explains a lot..... I noticed they both have a knack for blowing the big games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 Marty even fired Herman Edwards. He got one thing right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonCorleone Posted January 15, 2007 Author Share Posted January 15, 2007 Marty even fired Herman Edwards. He got one thing right. Are you serious? What was Hermano's capacity with the team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 Are you serious? What was Hermano's capacity with the team? Chef. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjam76 Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 Cause Brian S is Marty's son and learned from him. The way the Jets didn't show up in the second half on offense isn't exactly a testament to how good Brian S might become. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 Cause Brian S is Marty's son and learned from him. The way the Jets didn't show up in the second half on offense isn't exactly a testament to how good Brian S might become. B Schottenheimer's offense was all right: no game-breaking receivers, no game-breaking TE, no running back to speak of, a limp-armed QB that only lets you use half your playbook, a couple of undersized guards and two rookie OLs. Hey, they were in the playoffs. And not because their defense was all-world. I think he managed all right. I would love to see the rest of the playbook some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonCorleone Posted January 15, 2007 Author Share Posted January 15, 2007 Cause Brian S is Marty's son and learned from him. The way the Jets didn't show up in the second half on offense isn't exactly a testament to how good Brian S might become. Brian S is NOT a head coach. A good coordinator does not always translate into a good HC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 B Schottenheimer's offense was all right: no game-breaking receivers, no game-breaking TE, no running back to speak of, a limp-armed QB that only lets you use half your playbook, a couple of undersized guards and two rookie OLs. Hey, they were in the playoffs. And not because their defense was all-world. I think he managed all right. I would love to see the rest of the playbook some time. His receivers aren't the problem so much as a QB who can deliver the ball to them from more than 8 yards away (without 15 yards of air under it). And whether Leon is destined to be more than a 3rd-down back or not (as his appropriate role), that's the mold he fit this year. The CLEARLY above-average full-time players he had to work with on offense this year: 1) Coles 2) Cotchery 3) Mangold end of list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 His receivers aren't the problem so much as a QB who can deliver the ball to them from more than 8 yards away (without 15 yards of air under it). And whether Leon is destined to be more than a 3rd-down back or not (as his appropriate role), that's the mold he fit this year. The CLEARLY above-average full-time players he had to work with on offense this year: 1) Coles 2) Cotchery 3) Mangold end of list. Wouldn't that same list, in some small way effect the Qb of said offense, and said productivity, in some at least small manner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 If the QB was otherwise a deadly passer with a history of driving a stake into the heart of good defenses, then I would say yes. As it is, no. The offense was dumbed down for him. Not from an intellectual standpoint, as I believe Chad can (on paper) understand everything given to him. But clearly there aren't the same plays that other teams run (20-yd outs, 15-yd outs, 10-yd outs, rollouts with a receiver more than 8 yds away). But insinuating that Chad is somehow handcuffed by his lack of weapons at WR is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 If the QB was otherwise a deadly passer with a history of driving a stake into the heart of good defenses, then I would say yes. As it is, no. The offense was dumbed down for him. Not from an intellectual standpoint, as I believe Chad can (on paper) understand everything given to him. But clearly there aren't the same plays that other teams run (20-yd outs, 15-yd outs, 10-yd outs, rollouts with a receiver more than 8 yds away). But insinuating that Chad is somehow handcuffed by his lack of weapons at WR is silly. Wait, I thought your premise wast that we are "above average" on Wr, I concur. Also that Mangold may be the only othaer "above average' on the offense. My premise then is, if that is the case, wouldn't it help teh QB to some degree, to improve the talent around him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.