jets rooter Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 I think that the jets will alter their original choices.here are my picks for the jets. 1-sidney rice wr 2-adam carriker d.e. 2-fred bennett c.b. 3-james marten o.t. 5-kyle young c. o.g. 6-ken darby r.b. after the draft I like ryan powdrell f.b. as a free agent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 I'll be stuned if Carriker is still there at 15 let alone 37 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryno the Jet Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 I think that the jets will alter their original choices.here are my picks for the jets. 1-sidney rice wr 2-adam carriker d.e. 2-fred bennett c.b. 3-james marten o.t. 5-kyle young c. o.g. 6-ken darby r.b. after the draft I like ryan powdrell f.b. as a free agent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 If carriker is there at 25 and we take a WR...Im out. I quit Im done with the Jets....OUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gang_green03 Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 If carriker is there at 25 and we take a WR...Im out. I quit Im done with the Jets....OUT Yea I'd have to agree with that. If we take a WR not named Calvin Johnson over Carriker I don't know what I'd do. As far as Carriker being there in the 2nd round......he'd have to commit a crime right before the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 I really don't understand why anybody would think the Jets would take a WR with their 1st round pick it's one of our strongest positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLH222 Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 There have been too many times in the past where I have made the statement..."If the Jets (fill in the blank), then Im dont, Im out" Yet here I am...but I agree with you. Barring the unthinkable, ie Marshawn Lynch dropping, if Carriker is available, we better take him. WR is out of the question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 this post reminds me of that espn ad where the guy talks out of his a/s/s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 watch espn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 i know! the jets will draft 1-adrian peterson 2-alan branch 2-adam carriker 3-laron landry 4-dameion hughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 If carriker is there at 25 and we take a WR...Im out. I quit Im done with the Jets....OUT Tangini has not led us astray yet. I doubt they will let us down in this draft, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 Tangini has not led us astray yet. I doubt they will let us down in this draft, either. So if Tangini drafted a safety to compete with Kerry Rhodes you would agree with it? Tannebaum wouldnt draft a WR b/c its prob. our strongest position (if not the strongest its #2 or #3) we have a lot of other holes to fill and WR makes ZERO sense. I don't care if Calvin Johnson is avaliable....we DO NOT DRAFT WR in this draft.... Ok if CJ is avaliable in round 7 we can pick him up.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 So if Tangini drafted a safety to compete with Kerry Rhodes you would agree with it? Tannebaum wouldnt draft a WR b/c its prob. our strongest position (if not the strongest its #2 or #3) we have a lot of other holes to fill and WR makes ZERO sense. I don't care if Calvin Johnson is avaliable....we DO NOT DRAFT WR in this draft.... Ok if CJ is avaliable in round 7 we can pick him up.... If Tangini drafted a safety in the 1st round, of course I would not agree with it. My POINT was that I don't think they'll make a bad selection in the 1st round! I have more faith in them than that. They didn't do it last season, and made several strong selections in the later rounds that really appeared to help us last season. And if Calvin Johnson were available at 25, of COURSE you take him. Just because you don't need him doesn't mean you pass on a talent like that. He won't be available outside of the top 10, however, so its a moot point. But in the draft, you don't purely look at needs. You take it into consideration, but ultimately you choose players who will help you win, even if that position is already a strength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I just think you draft the positions you need. Yes obviously if a great WR is there you would draft him over drafting Max to play RG..... I would just much rather take a slightly less talented player at a position of need than a more talented player at a position where we are set at. I mean Vernon Davis was prob. considered the more talented player than D'Brick last year but we went with the position of need, not a "sexy pick." I mean if Brady Quinn or Jamarcus Russel drops to the Bengals they are not going to take him...no matter how good they think they are. WR we are good at, and relatively young, lets leave it alone and worry about the run game on both sides of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 So if Tangini drafted a safety to compete with Kerry Rhodes you would agree with it? Tannebaum wouldnt draft a WR b/c its prob. our strongest position (if not the strongest its #2 or #3) we have a lot of other holes to fill and WR makes ZERO sense. I don't care if Calvin Johnson is avaliable....we DO NOT DRAFT WR in this draft.... Ok if CJ is avaliable in round 7 we can pick him up.... I just think you draft the positions you need. Yes obviously if a great WR is there you would draft him over drafting Max to play RG but I would much rather take a slightly less talented player at a position of need than a more talented player at a position where we are set at. I mean Vernon Davis was prob. considered the more talented player than D'Brick last year but we went with the position of need, not a "sexy pick." I mean if Brady Quinn or Jamarcus Russel drops to the Bengals they are not going to take him...no matter how good they think they are. WR we are good at, and relatively young, lets leave it alone and worry about the run game on both sides of the ball. All I'm trying to say is, If a great player falls in your lap, however, you take him, regardless of need. I'd PREFER to get a mauling guard, a quality nose tackle or 3-4 defensive end with the early pick(s). However, if all the good ones are taken by the time we pick, you take the best available player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Ok, I disagree, I think you go to the next position of need and evaluate if that player (say a DE or DT) would be a more valuable asset than a more talented player at WR. Whatever, agree to disagree, besides I dont think there is a point to argue considering I highly doubt a great WR, of the caliber necessary for the jets to take him, will drop to 25.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Carriker is going to be way gone before we are up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.