Smizzy Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Nanny, $44,880; Redskins Owner, 0 By THE NEW YORK TIMES A nanny who said that Daniel M. Snyder, owner of the Washington Redskins, had underpaid her won $44,880 last week when a Montgomery County Circuit Court in Maryland agreed that she had not been compensated for overtime hours she had worked. Juliette Mendonca sued Mr. Snyder for $60,000 in overtime that she said she had earned while caring for the three children of Mr. Snyder and his wife, Tanya. This was on top of the $162,000 she was paid during that same period, from April 2003 to November 2004. She testified that Mr. Snyder confronted her late one night in 2004, saying: “I pay you more than my Redskins park people! I can’t afford to pay you like this!” Mr. Snyder, who is also chairman of the amusement park giant Six Flags, did not take the stand. But his wife testified that Ms. Mendonca could not have worked all the hours she claimed. They offered her a $65,000 salary, but she refused it, preferring to work on an hourly basis, the couple’s lawyer said. The jury did not explain how it arrived at the amount of the award, according to Ms. Mendonca’s lawyer, Frank J. Coviello, but it rejected her demand for damages of $180,000 in the case. There is no word so far on whether the Snyders will appeal. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/business/yourmoney/18suits.html 200K for a nanny? F-me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/business/yourmoney/18suits.html 200K for a nanny? F-me. I would agree if it were ANYONE but Dan Snyder. F-HIM. Serves him right for raiding our FA Jets a few years back. That of course has no bearing on this case it just made me feel good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 If they are paying 200k I am going to assume they won't win partents of the year anytime soon. Since it sounds like they are never around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 If they are paying 200k I am going to assume they won't win partents of the year anytime soon. Since it sounds like they are never around. Actually, while what you say could be true, a lot of people with that kind of coin pay the nanny even if they are around, and especially to get up at night with the children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionelRichie Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 the people in this area love the redskins and hate snyder. he had no chance in court and probably should have asked for a venue change. he's lucky th jury didn't award more to the woman then she asked for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Nanny, $44,880; Redskins Owner, 0 By THE NEW YORK TIMES A nanny who said that Daniel M. Snyder, owner of the Washington Redskins, had underpaid her won $44,880 last week when a Montgomery County Circuit Court in Maryland agreed that she had not been compensated for overtime hours she had worked. Juliette Mendonca sued Mr. Snyder for $60,000 in overtime that she said she had earned while caring for the three children of Mr. Snyder and his wife, Tanya. This was on top of the $162,000 she was paid during that same period, from April 2003 to November 2004. She testified that Mr. Snyder confronted her late one night in 2004, saying: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENSMACKS Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 shoudlve asked archuleta to babysit since he was on the sidelines all season anways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 Another great contract negotiated by the 'skins front office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 Another great contract negotiated by the 'skins front office. POTW nom hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gun Of Bavaria Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 Nanny/Au Pairs = Substitute Parents. Make no mistake, people who make enough money to pay for these do so because they're never around to raise their own kids. Pathetic is what I call them. I couldn't imagine not being around my daughter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EM31 Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 At that price perhaps she was providing a "loving environment" for more than the children Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeniorFlaJet Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 The Snyders will appeal it and it will go on for years. They can afford the process as they have lawyers on retainers all the time. I don't know how old the woman is but she may be long gone by the time its settled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.