onemanswarm Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Every Tuesday morning, I wake up an hour early so that I can sit on the floor of my shower and meditate on the current state of the NFL until the water runs cold. This morning, through the power of prayer, the following rankings were revealed to me: 1. New England Patriots (3-0): New England is trying to become the first team to go 16-0 while scoring 38 points in every game. Interestingly, 38 is the atomic number of Strontium. In the Patriot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 20. New York Jets (1-2): Overheard at Jets practice: Mangini: Our gameplan is simple. Everyone fights. Nobody quits. You do your job or I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Tennessee Titans (2-1): Jeff Fisher celebrated his new contract by sculpting some horrendous facial hair. That Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 30. Oakland Raiders (1-2): LaMont Jordan is the most pleasant surprise since Katie Holmes bared her bosoms in The Gift. :rl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 [20. New York Jets (1-2): Overheard at Jets practice: Mangini: Our gameplan is simple. Everyone fights. Nobody quits. You do your job or I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 RANKING US AT 20?!??!? come on, show some love here. although i don't have much of an argument to move us up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 RANKING US AT 20?!??!? come on, show some love here. although i don't have much of an argument to move us up. Since 16 teams have a better record than us, the highest you could possibly have put us is 17th. And considering how our D did everything possible to let Miami get back into last week's game, I agree that there are other 1-2 teams better than us right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onemanswarm Posted September 26, 2007 Author Share Posted September 26, 2007 Thank you. Happy to oblige! Hope it was to your liking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Happy to oblige! Hope it was to your liking. It always is. Keep up the great work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Since 16 teams have a better record than us, the highest you could possibly have put us is 17th. And considering how our D did everything possible to let Miami get back into last week's game, I agree that there are other 1-2 teams better than us right now. 20 is fair, if anything he ranked his Bears low at 19, but with Rex' performance and the D's injuries, it might be accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onemanswarm Posted September 26, 2007 Author Share Posted September 26, 2007 20 is fair, if anything he ranked his Bears low at 19, but with Rex' performance and the D's injuries, it might be accurate. Where is the "soft weeping of inevitable defeat" emoticon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Where is the "soft weeping of inevitable defeat" emoticon? We don't need an emoticon for that. It's just understood around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Am I the only one that is moderately disturbed about looking forward to this man sitting in his shower each Tuesday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Excellent. The Steelers rushed for a touchdown, passed for a touchdown, returned a kick for a touchdown, and returned a pick for a touchdown. You couldn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 Am I the only one that is moderately disturbed about looking forward to this man sitting in his shower each Tuesday? I'd nominate this every week for POTWN but I think it would win every week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onemanswarm Posted September 27, 2007 Author Share Posted September 27, 2007 We don't need an emoticon for that. It's just understood around here. Hahaha. I suppose so. Damn, it's been awhile since I was this down on my Bears. When you try to build a championship contender based on defense, the window closes so quickly. The only thing that can keep that window propped open for more than two or three years is a dominant quarterback. As far as I can tell, the Chicago football franchise has never had that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 Hahaha. I suppose so. Damn, it's been awhile since I was this down on my Bears. When you try to build a championship contender based on defense, the window closes so quickly. The only thing that can keep that window propped open for more than two or three years is a dominant quarterback. As far as I can tell, the Chicago football franchise has never had that. What about Bob Avellini? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 Hahaha. I suppose so. Damn, it's been awhile since I was this down on my Bears. When you try to build a championship contender based on defense, the window closes so quickly. The only thing that can keep that window propped open for more than two or three years is a dominant quarterback. As far as I can tell, the Chicago football franchise has never had that. What about good ole' #9? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 What about good ole' #9? Mike Phipps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 Mike Phipps? Jim McMahon baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 the Bears have no one to blame but themselves cmon Rex Grossman? from florida? you have to be a friggin moron to be sitting in a draft room and say "hey ya know, i think Rex Grossman will be our franchise QB! he'll be the next Danny Weurfel!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onemanswarm Posted September 28, 2007 Author Share Posted September 28, 2007 the Bears have no one to blame but themselves cmon Rex Grossman? from florida? you have to be a friggin moron to be sitting in a draft room and say "hey ya know, i think Rex Grossman will be our franchise QB! he'll be the next Danny Weurfel!" No question. But the only other guy they had a reasonable shot at that year was Leftwich, and he hasn't exactly shredded the league either. McMahon was ten times more character than quarterback. Just about every Bear passing record is held by Sid Luckman, and I'm pretty sure the forward pass was still considered a trick play during his era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.