Smizzy Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 Notice that they are the only ones in the NFL who have to come back to the football...on every single pass? It's comical....if this coaching staff can't see Chad is horrible than they must really think Clemens sucks. How little faith can you have in a guy...I mean ****...backup QB's play all the time. He played well....why is he force feeding us Chad Pennington? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 Well you got your wish Smizzy, Chad throws it behind WR's for picks, Kellen throws it 5yrds ahead of them for picks. Hmmmmm......Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpartanJet Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 Why have receivers for Chad? Get a team of runningbacks and fullbacks to dump the ball off to. He can't throw more than 2 yards anyway. Maybe the runningbacks and fullbacks can take the hits better when Chad gets them laid out throwing those 5 rainbows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Why have receivers for Chad? Get a team of runningbacks and fullbacks to dump the ball off to. He can't throw more than 2 yards anyway. Maybe the runningbacks and fullbacks can take the hits better when Chad gets them laid out throwing those 5 rainbows. If Becht could have caught the ball better than half the time he'd still be here and would be Pus Arms leading reciever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Our recievers are too small. Enough said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Our recievers are too small. Enough said. Yeah, if only they were as tall as Lee Evans then they might have been able to do some damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anskyruben Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I thought the Jets stopped using Wide Receivers after Chrebet retired ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I thought the Jets stopped using Wide Receivers after Chrebet retired ......... Pennington wants to put at least one more into retirement first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Pennington wants to put at least one more into retirement first. yea he almost got Coles killed there today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anskyruben Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Pennington wants to put at least one more into retirement first. What, you think passes up the middle into triple coverage are bad for a WR ?? Where did you get such an idea ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdhc Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 What, you think passes up the middle into triple coverage are bad for a WR ?? Where did you get such an idea ? Its not the triple coverage, its the high lobs that give the defense a running start to smashing the WR. I do feel bad that the Jet wideouts now may have sore hands trying to catch balls thrown with an NFL arm but at least they won't be laid out anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Our recievers are too small. Enough said. I didnt see Evans laying on the carpet from a pass thrown where the recievers are laid out to dry! Coles and Cotchery are Ok WE arent winning CHAMPIONSHIPS with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damaged89 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I didnt see Evans laying on the carpet from a pass thrown where the recievers are laid out to dry! Coles and Cotchery are Ok WE arent winning CHAMPIONSHIPS with them. Instead of boycotting Jets games could you just boycott this board please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Instead of boycotting Jets games could you just boycott this board please? WHY does the TRUTH hurt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damaged89 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 WHY does the TRUTH hurt? Does being stupid hurt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted October 29, 2007 Author Share Posted October 29, 2007 Does being stupid hurt? Guys...we lost...let's not take it out on eachother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upstatefan Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Receivers are ok...it's certainly not the first area to look for weak links. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I didnt see Evans laying on the carpet from a pass thrown where the recievers are laid out to dry! Coles and Cotchery are Ok WE arent winning CHAMPIONSHIPS with them. Clown. Our receivers are BY FAR the least of our problems. There are certainly one of the better WR tandems in the NFL. If we can get a QB that can actually get them the ball that would be nice. Of all the things to complain about this team you whine about the receivers?? Oy vey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Notice that they are the only ones in the NFL who have to come back to the football...on every single pass? It's comical....if this coaching staff can't see Chad is horrible than they must really think Clemens sucks. How little faith can you have in a guy...I mean ****...backup QB's play all the time. He played well....why is he force feeding us Chad Pennington? It is more than that. There was a play were Chad had over 7 seconds in the pocket. He hit Cotch for an 8 yard gain. Smith was about 40 yards down the field. Nobody else was past 12 yards down the field. Bunch them all together. Sounds like a plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted October 29, 2007 Author Share Posted October 29, 2007 It is more than that. There was a play were Chad had over 7 seconds in the pocket. He hit Cotch for an 8 yard gain. Smith was about 40 yards down the field. Nobody else was past 12 yards down the field. Bunch them all together. Sounds like a plan. Why spread them out downfield? He can't hit them out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 It is more than that. There was a play were Chad had over 7 seconds in the pocket. He hit Cotch for an 8 yard gain. Smith was about 40 yards down the field. Nobody else was past 12 yards down the field. Bunch them all together. Sounds like a plan. Why do you think we don't use play action passes anymore? Not much point if you're just going to dump it off anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.