afosomf Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Saw this blurb Queens considering offering a 4th for Rosenfels I do not think Pats will get more than a 2nd for mamma cass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 I had to look up news on Rosenfels to realize that the "Queens" were the Vikings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted February 24, 2009 Author Share Posted February 24, 2009 I had to look up news on Rosenfels to realize that the "Queens" were the Vikings. Come on Man:D:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I thought you were talking about an AFL team or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Among the dumbest franchises in the league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted February 24, 2009 Author Share Posted February 24, 2009 Among the dumbest franchises in the league poor baby one of pats possible trade partners Sage= mamacass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 poor baby one of pats possible trade partners Sage= mamacass Cassel>Lord Farvy>WhatsMyNamath>Clemon>Ratbasturd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted February 24, 2009 Author Share Posted February 24, 2009 Cassel>Lord Farvy>WhatsMyNamath>Clemon>Ratbasturd correction JWN>Farvre>Clemons>Rat>Cass>cindy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I had to look up news on Rosenfels to realize that the "Queens" were the Vikings. And here I thought I was the only one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 correction JWN>Farvre>Clemons>Rat>Cass>cindy JWGameManager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F.Chowds Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Cassel>Lord Farvy>WhatsMyNamath>Clemon>Ratbasturd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted February 24, 2009 Author Share Posted February 24, 2009 And here I thought I was the only one maybe i should have used Thug turds:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Why cant you just talk normal afo? Are you a 1 year old girl? Cmon... admit it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Matt linehart>Cassel Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 And here I thought I was the only one He had me too. 1st thought he meant the team that used to play in Queens, NY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Sage Rosenfels is the best QB in HOU, getting him for a 4th is a steal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergen Jet Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Did anybody know that the "Queens" refer to the Vikings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted February 24, 2009 Author Share Posted February 24, 2009 Did anybody know that the "Queens" refer to the Vikings? who knew there was more than 1 monarchy in NFL....oh my Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Among the dumbest franchises in the league Tell me what this player would be worth: - undrafted - in the league for 3 years - had been released/not re-signed by 2 NFL teams already - 1 kick return TD as a rookie then a couple of years later got another, bringing his career grand total on offense and special teams to 2 - averaged 9 yards per punt return & 22 yds per KO return (pretty pedestrian #'s) - rookie year: 0 rec yds; 2nd year: 430 rec yds; 3rd year: 680 rec yds - WR height: 5'9 and had a poor "40 time" Is this the resume of someone who was worth trading away a 2nd round pick plus a 7th round pick (to a division rival no less) plus awarding a $30M contract to? Time will tell. I don't think much of Rosenfels, but the Vikings seem to be one of those franchises that merely needs someone to merely be not-horrible at QB. Rosenfels might qualify there. Or they could draft a QB in the 4th round and hope to get him competing for a starting role right away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tell me what this player would be worth: - undrafted - in the league for 3 years - had been released/not re-signed by 2 NFL teams already - 1 kick return TD as a rookie then a couple of years later got another, bringing his career grand total on offense and special teams to 2 - averaged 9 yards per punt return & 22 yds per KO return (pretty pedestrian #'s) - rookie year: 0 rec yds; 2nd year: 430 rec yds; 3rd year: 680 rec yds - WR height: 5'9 and had a poor "40 time" Is this the resume of someone who was worth trading away a 2nd round pick plus a 7th round pick (to a division rival no less) plus awarding a $30M contract to? Time will tell. I don't think much of Rosenfels, but the Vikings seem to be one of those franchises that merely needs someone to merely be not-horrible at QB. Rosenfels might qualify there. Or they could draft a QB in the 4th round and hope to get him competing for a starting role right away. The Vikings have been plagued by inconsisent QB play for years. To even have Tavaris Jackson on the roster is a joke. QB is the most important position on the team. Look none other than to the Steelers pre Big Ben. Sage Rosenfields?? Are you kidding me? The defensive gameplan would be simple: stop Peterson and you stop the Vikings because Rosenfields aint gonna bring it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 The Vikings have been plagued by inconsisent QB play for years. To even have Tavaris Jackson on the roster is a joke. QB is the most important position on the team. Look none other than to the Steelers pre Big Ben. Sage Rosenfields?? Are you kidding me? The defensive gameplan would be simple: stop Peterson and you stop the Vikings because Rosenfields aint gonna bring it. 1) It's not a done deal yet. 2) Players with less of a resume than Sage Rosenfels have done well (or well enough to not be the cause of failure). 3) QB is the most important position and it isn't. It's important that your QB isn't the worst thing around or close enough to it that you're splitting hairs (which is what they had in Tavaris Jackson). But 2 of the 4 "final 4" QB's this year were Kerry Collins and Joe Flacco. 4) Rosenfels may be ok and he may not. I wouldn't be optimistic but on Aug 28, 1999 the Rams looked like their season was in the crapper because of their new starting QB. 5) Can he be as good as Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, etc.? No freakin' way. Can he be as good as Trent Dilfer '00, Joe Flacco '08, Stan Humphries '94, Rex Grossman '06, Jake Delhomme '03, Kerry Collins '96/'00/'08, Tony Eason-Steve Grogan '85, early 80's Jim Plunkett? I'm not saying he will be, but he can be. 6) Minnesota sucks, and so does Sage Rosenfels. (now watch him have a great season after this) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jared Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Using Welker is a terrible example. He is was a young player who was constantly improving each season and had his best season while playing with a terrible stable of QBs. Rosenfels however is an 8 year veteran and seems to have peaked at mediocre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Using Welker is a terrible example. He is was a young player who was constantly improving each season and had his best season while playing with a terrible stable of QBs. Rosenfels however is an 8 year veteran and seems to have peaked at mediocre. He's a perfect example because, young or old, it was commonly thought that NE insanely overpaid for him. And he wasn't "constantly improving each season" - he had received more playing time on a team who had garbage at WR. The same team that released him outright not long before that. Then SD picked him up & they let him go as well. Hell, at the time NE traded for him he had started exactly twice in 3 seasons: once in 2005 and once in 2006. In the first of those 2 starts, he caught 1 pass for 16 yards. Constantly improving, lol. Hey, coming into this year Patrick Crayton was "constantly improving" also. Think anyone was going to give up a 2nd rounder for him? I don't think much of Rosenfels, but I've seen teams take a chance on a "low ceiling" guy before & have it work out for them, like Rich Gannon with Oakland (34 yrs old at the time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.