GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 This is the NFL.com view of the Sanchez extension. The last line is an interesting choice of words. Sorry I couldn't seem to paste the article. Here is the link. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8278a205/article/mark-sanchezs-extension-with-jets-isnt-all-it-seems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Wrong. The Jets are stupid because Steven A. Smith and some random posters said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 "All told, Sanchez will get $20.5 million guaranteed compared to $17.75 million of non-guaranteed money over the next two years. It's a "measly" raise of $2.75 million." In related news, Snooki is a rocket scientist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 "All told, Sanchez will get $20.5 million guaranteed compared to $17.75 million of non-guaranteed money over the next two years. It's a "measly" raise of $2.75 million." In related news, Snooki is a rocket scientist! It's nice that we can use the word "measly" when talking about almost $3 mil, but in NFL terms it is. Especially when they get 6.4 in cap space this year. They basically paid to get more available money. Where else does this stuff make sense? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 Wrong. The Jets are stupid because Steven A. Smith and some random posters said so. yeah, I love reading articles from other teams gloating fans about what's going on with the Jets. It's where I prefer to get my unbiased information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 The New York Jets' decision to extend the contract of Mark Sanchez was met with derision by many' date=' but [b']like the plot of a Spanish soap opera, it takes time to figure out what's going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Nice to see objective journalism is still alive and kicking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 It's nice that we can use the word "measly" when talking about almost $3 mil, but in NFL terms it is. Especially when they get 6.4 in cap space this year. They basically paid to get more available money. Where else does this stuff make sense? lol THe guarente is the big thing, Sanchez could hurt his neck tomorrow playing tonsil hockey with JIF and we'd still be on the hook for 20M over next two years... The guarenteed money is what every player cares about... Those trying to spin this as a win / win are homerific, it's certainly conceivable that a guy like Orton would've come here and beat out Sanchez if not for this extension. What we've done is effectively locked ourselves up for another 2 years to a guy with 3 years of bad QB play on his resume... Dumb Dumb Dumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 THe guarente is the big thing, Sanchez could hurt his neck tomorrow playing tonsil hockey with JIF and we'd still be on the hook for 20M over next two years... The guarenteed money is what every player cares about... Those trying to spin this as a win / win are homerific, it's certainly conceivable that a guy like Orton would've come here and beat out Sanchez if not for this extension. What we've done is effectively locked ourselves up for another 2 years to a guy with 3 years of bad QB play on his resume... Dumb Dumb Dumb Your's is one person's opinion also. A person who delusionally thinks he can qb the NY jets as well as the current qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Your's is one person's opinion also. A person who delusionally thinks he can qb the NY jets as well as the current qb. Haha.. is that what you got out of that? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 THe guarente is the big thing, Sanchez could hurt his neck tomorrow playing tonsil hockey with JIF and we'd still be on the hook for 20M over next two years... The guarenteed money is what every player cares about... Those trying to spin this as a win / win are homerific, it's certainly conceivable that a guy like Orton would've come here and beat out Sanchez if not for this extension. What we've done is effectively locked ourselves up for another 2 years to a guy with 3 years of bad QB play on his resume... Dumb Dumb Dumb Kyle Orton lost his starting job to Tim Tebow who proceed to be infinitely better than Orton (like someone on this board predicted). Kyle Orton would not beat out Sanchez nor would I want the steaming pile of mush any where near this franchise. Getting bent out of shape because the Jets wont have a top flight back up (whatever that is) is petty. Mark Sanchez was/is/will be starting in 2012, period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 It's nice that we can use the word "measly" when talking about almost $3 mil, but in NFL terms it is. Especially when they get 6.4 in cap space this year. They basically paid to get more available money. Where else does this stuff make sense? lol All good points. But borrowing the terminology from an article on a reputable JETS site, the JETS played meatball strategy instead of hardball! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Kyle Orton lost his starting job to Tim Tebow who proceed to be infinitely better than Orton (like someone on this board predicted). Kyle Orton would not beat out Sanchez nor would I want the steaming pile of mush any where near this franchise. Getting bent out of shape because the Jets wont have a top flight back up (whatever that is) is petty. Mark Sanchez was/is/will be starting in 2012, period. I don't want Orton...I want me some Henne or Dennis Dixon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 All good points. But borrowing the terminology from an article on a reputable JETS site, the JETS played meatball strategy instead of hardball! Hardball implies that you have some sort of back-up plan. The Jets have no back-up plan that can be called anything close to appetizing or smart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Mark Sanchez's extension with Jets isn't all it seems 41 By Dan Hanzus NFL.com Published: March 12, 2012 at 12:37 p.m. Updated: March 12, 2012 at 01:12 p.m. [*]Print The New York Jets' decision to extend the contract of Mark Sanchez was met with derision by many, but like the plot of a Spanish soap opera, it takes time to figure out what's going on. Sanchez signed a three-year extension with the team on Friday, but he wasn't significantly richer or more secure when he woke up on Monday morning. In 2012, Sanchez will make the same money ($11.75 million) he was set to earn before the extension. The difference is how it pays out: According to NationalFootballPost.com, Sanchez will now receive an $8 million signing bonus and a $3.25 million guaranteed salary, along with an offseason workout bonus of $500,000. The bonus is spread over the five remaining years of the deal, saving $6.4 million against the Jets' cap. In 2013, Sanchez goes from a non-guaranteed $6 million to a guaranteed $8.75 million. The guarantee is nice, though it would have taken an epically bad season (think Blaine Gabbert, only more abject terror) for the Jets not to bring him back in the final year of his original deal. All told, Sanchez will get $20.5 million guaranteed compared to $17.75 million of non-guaranteed money over the next two years. It's a "measly" raise of $2.75 million. The rest of the deal is non-guaranteed, meaning the Jets can cut ties whenever they like. If Sanchez puts it together and becomes the quarterback they hope for, the Jets will have him under their control for three additional seasons at a discount rate. This was smart business. Finally, there's a surreal aspect to the extension in the form of an escalator that can reach a cool $10 million if Sanchez leads the Jets to four Super Bowl titles in the next five seasons. Of course, the Jets haven't been to a Super Bowl -- let alone won the damn game -- in 43 years. If Sanchez led the charge on a four-peat, the world would collapse into itself before the final check changed hands. The Jets are geniuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Hardball implies that you have some sort of back-up plan. The Jets have no back-up plan that can be called anything close to appetizing or smart True. But what would be Sanchez's backup plan if he was released from the JETS. No way in hell is anyone paying him even close to 20 mill for 2 years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Mark Sanchez's extension with Jets isn't all it seems 41 By Dan Hanzus NFL.com Published: March 12, 2012 at 12:37 p.m. Updated: March 12, 2012 at 01:12 p.m. [*]Print The New York Jets' decision to extend the contract of Mark Sanchez was met with derision by many, but like the plot of a Spanish soap opera, it takes time to figure out what's going on. Sanchez signed a three-year extension with the team on Friday, but he wasn't significantly richer or more secure when he woke up on Monday morning. In 2012, Sanchez will make the same money ($11.75 million) he was set to earn before the extension. The difference is how it pays out: According to NationalFootballPost.com, Sanchez will now receive an $8 million signing bonus and a $3.25 million guaranteed salary, along with an offseason workout bonus of $500,000. The bonus is spread over the five remaining years of the deal, saving $6.4 million against the Jets' cap. In 2013, Sanchez goes from a non-guaranteed $6 million to a guaranteed $8.75 million. The guarantee is nice, though it would have taken an epically bad season (think Blaine Gabbert, only more abject terror) for the Jets not to bring him back in the final year of his original deal. All told, Sanchez will get $20.5 million guaranteed compared to $17.75 million of non-guaranteed money over the next two years. It's a "measly" raise of $2.75 million. The rest of the deal is non-guaranteed, meaning the Jets can cut ties whenever they like. If Sanchez puts it together and becomes the quarterback they hope for, the Jets will have him under their control for three additional seasons at a discount rate. This was smart business. Finally, there's a surreal aspect to the extension in the form of an escalator that can reach a cool $10 million if Sanchez leads the Jets to four Super Bowl titles in the next five seasons. Of course, the Jets haven't been to a Super Bowl -- let alone won the damn game -- in 43 years. If Sanchez led the charge on a four-peat, the world would collapse into itself before the final check changed hands. The Jets are geniuses. Betcha Dan Hanzus gets the lead on the next JETS scoop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Kyle Orton lost his starting job to Tim Tebow who proceed to be infinitely better than Orton (like someone on this board predicted). Kyle Orton would not beat out Sanchez nor would I want the steaming pile of mush any where near this franchise. Getting bent out of shape because the Jets wont have a top flight back up (whatever that is) is petty. Mark Sanchez was/is/will be starting in 2012, period. Kyle Orton would stand a good chance of both beating out and playing better then Sanchez, sorry Nancy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 All good points. But borrowing the terminology from an article on a reputable JETS site, the JETS played meatball strategy instead of hardball! That strategy sounds delicious. Where can I learn of such things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Kyle Orton would stand a good chance of both beating out and playing better then Sanchez, sorry Nancy No, he wouldnt. He's a perpetual loser and proved so in Denver. If you think that then you think Tebow >>> Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 THe guarente is the big thing, Sanchez could hurt his neck tomorrow playing tonsil hockey with JIF and we'd still be on the hook for 20M over next two years... The guarenteed money is what every player cares about... Those trying to spin this as a win / win are homerific, it's certainly conceivable that a guy like Orton would've come here and beat out Sanchez if not for this extension. What we've done is effectively locked ourselves up for another 2 years to a guy with 3 years of bad QB play on his resume... Dumb Dumb Dumb While I don't necessarily disagree with you, I am a believer in giving him more than three years. I like the move to retain him. The cap room is good too. I could care less if Woody pays more as long as the cap numbers work out for the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 No, he wouldnt. He's a perpetual loser and proved so in Denver. If you think that then you think Tebow >>> Sanchez. Mark Sanchez is a bottom 10 QB by most any meaningful QB stat... I know he's hunky 4u, but Brady losing last SB should put to bed the arguement that winning SB's is about teh ghey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Mark Sanchez is a bottom 10 QB by most any meaningful QB stat... I know he's hunky 4u, but Brady losing last SB should put to bed the arguement that winning SB's is about teh ghey I have no idea what that has to do with Kyle Orton being a perpetual loser, but I see your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I have no idea what that has to do with Kyle Orton being a perpetual loser, but I see your point. Kyle Orton was 21-12 on bears when surrounded with a decent team.. with better stats then Sanchez.. If Sanchez had been on Dever the last 3 years his record would be 5-43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Kyle Orton was 21-12 on bears when surrounded with a decent team.. with better stats then Sanchez.. If Sanchez had been on Dever the last 3 years his record would be 5-43 And the year he was out for the season, Rex Grossman led them to the SB. So what? Orton sucks donkey dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 And Rex Grossman led them to the SB. So what? Orton sucks donkey dick. Agreed, just not as hard or as often as Sanchez.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Agreed, just not as hard or as often as Sanchez.. lol I dunno. 9-20 in the last 2 seasons with the same team Tebow took to a division title and win vs. Pitts in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 "Finally, there's a surreal aspect to the extension in the form of an escalator that can reach a cool $10 million if Sanchez leads the Jets to four Super Bowl titles in the next five seasons." ^^^^^^^^What's up with these crazy clauses that Tanny puts into contracts? If the Jets win four Superbowls in the next five seasons, *I* willl *personally* hand over the $10 mil to Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I dunno. 9-20 in the last 2 seasons with the same team Tebow took to a division title and win vs. Pitts in the playoffs. ANd sanchez would've been 2-30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 ANd sanchez would've been 2-30 The ol' supposition angle that can not be proved, always leaves 'em guessing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorge o8 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 as a huge jets fan i dont think we are drafting well the latter rounds we past on great pass rushers im afraid at what they are going to do witha great pick like 16 scared really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 Mark Sanchez's extension with Jets isn't all it seems 41 By Dan Hanzus NFL.com Published: March 12, 2012 at 12:37 p.m. Updated: March 12, 2012 at 01:12 p.m. [*]Print The New York Jets' decision to extend the contract of Mark Sanchez was met with derision by many, but like the plot of a Spanish soap opera, it takes time to figure out what's going on. Sanchez signed a three-year extension with the team on Friday, but he wasn't significantly richer or more secure when he woke up on Monday morning. In 2012, Sanchez will make the same money ($11.75 million) he was set to earn before the extension. The difference is how it pays out: According to NationalFootballPost.com, Sanchez will now receive an $8 million signing bonus and a $3.25 million guaranteed salary, along with an offseason workout bonus of $500,000. The bonus is spread over the five remaining years of the deal, saving $6.4 million against the Jets' cap. In 2013, Sanchez goes from a non-guaranteed $6 million to a guaranteed $8.75 million. The guarantee is nice, though it would have taken an epically bad season (think Blaine Gabbert, only more abject terror) for the Jets not to bring him back in the final year of his original deal. All told, Sanchez will get $20.5 million guaranteed compared to $17.75 million of non-guaranteed money over the next two years. It's a "measly" raise of $2.75 million. The rest of the deal is non-guaranteed, meaning the Jets can cut ties whenever they like. If Sanchez puts it together and becomes the quarterback they hope for, the Jets will have him under their control for three additional seasons at a discount rate. This was smart business. Finally, there's a surreal aspect to the extension in the form of an escalator that can reach a cool $10 million if Sanchez leads the Jets to four Super Bowl titles in the next five seasons. Of course, the Jets haven't been to a Super Bowl -- let alone won the damn game -- in 43 years. If Sanchez led the charge on a four-peat, the world would collapse into itself before the final check changed hands. The Jets are geniuses. Thanks I suck at that. I should leave it to you, the news pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 "Finally, there's a surreal aspect to the extension in the form of an escalator that can reach a cool $10 million if Sanchez leads the Jets to four Super Bowl titles in the next five seasons." ^^^^^^^^What's up with these crazy clauses that Tanny puts into contracts? If the Jets win four Superbowls in the next five seasons, *I* willl *personally* hand over the $10 mil to Sanchez. Right? Hey.... ya never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 ANd sanchez would've been 2-30 So you agree....Tebow >>> Sanchez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 So you agree....Tebow >>> Sanchez Dude.. Of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.