Dr. Strangelove Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 It's hard to make a guess here. For all we know we might not even own this pick by next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Strangelove Posted March 22, 2006 Author Share Posted March 22, 2006 Grab D'Brick at 4 and grab a RB at 29? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Although if he's still around somehow LAWRENCE MARONEY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latinlawyer Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 ? the center from Ohio State... MANGOLD! That guy can be groomed to replace Mawae! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Grab D'Brick at 4 and grab a RB at 29? I was thinking the samething. If we trade down to #17, then go Greenway/Vernon Davis/McNeil then Maroney with #29. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 D'Brick at 4 is a no brainer. At 29, we have a lot of options. The Jets have another pick within 5 picks after that. Depending on the way the board looks, we could do a number of things at 29. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Whatever it is DO NOT use it to package and trade up!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CluJet Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 It's hard to make a guess here. For all we know we might not even own this pick by next week. Aha, a Toolhead as well I see? 10,000 days - can't wait 'til May 2nd. Oh, and to stay on topic: Mangold at 29, unless Katnik is the direction they are going in. Otherwise, it's OT, or just BPA (Maroney?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I have no problem send the 29th pick and say a 4th rd pick to move up 3 or 4 spots....In no way do I want them to deal #4 & #29 to move up into the top 3. My guess would be Bellichick blasted the Jets and mocked them on draft day the last time they traded up. Hopefully Mangini realizes this would also be a bad move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I agree Smizzy...I was referring to moving up into the top 3.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I have no problem send the 29th pick and say a 4th rd pick to move up 3 or 4 spots....In no way do I want them to deal #4 & #29 to move up into the top 3. My guess would be Bellichick blasted the Jets and mocked them on draft day the last time they traded up. Hopefully Mangini realizes this would also be a bad move. I'm really not stalking you - but we agree 100% again. If I may add I would not mind trading down from 4 a little and picking up a couple more 1st day picks. There is A LOT of talent out there in this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If no trade down from #4? D'Brick, OT at #4 Mangold at #29 (pray to god he's still on the board) Best OT/OG at #36 Best QB (Croyle/Jacobs) at 3rd Round Best CB with 3rd Round Comp Pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If no trade down from #4? D'Brick, OT at #4 Mangold at #29 (pray to god he's still on the board) Best OT/OG at #36 Best QB (Croyle/Jacobs) at 3rd Round Best CB with 3rd Round Comp Pick this would be best case definately between 29 and 35 they are looking for Nick Mangold, or best avail OL They could be thinking use 4 for Mario/Cutler use both 29 and 35 on OL. There will be tackles there, also BAPs at other positions. This is a great draft to have all these picks. Mangini will need a whole slew of kids to make his program work. Look for high energy high character guys. The bottom line with Abe is he's got 2 strikes on the substance abuse program and the last guy you want to give long term money. They got a 1st, didn't get abused and everyone's happy. A good deal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiamiJet Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 this would be best case definately between 29 and 35 they are looking for Nick Mangold, or best avail OL They could be thinking use 4 for Mario/Cutler use both 29 and 35 on OL. There will be tackles there, also BAPs at other positions. This is a great draft to have all these picks. Mangini will need a whole slew of kids to make his program work. Look for high energy high character guys. The bottom line with Abe is he's got 2 strikes on the substance abuse program and the last guy you want to give long term money. They got a 1st, didn't get abused and everyone's happy. A good deal! I never even factored in Abe's substance abuse issues. I know Atlanta really well. Lots of temptation. Good move for the Falcons, but be careful..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonEJet Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Gabe Watson wouldn;t be too shabby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsnts725 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 i think Mangold will be there for our 2nd round choice, may be they can choose here are some people I think the Jets they should look at: WR Sinorice Moss, Miami RB Lawerence Maroney, Minnesota DE Mathias Kiwanuka, BC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 D'Brickashaw at 4. C Nick Mangold at 29. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If the Jets are so high on Katnik, then there is no reason to spend a first rounder on Mangold. The Jets can do a LOT of things with that pick. Don't even rule out a trade down. In the 2004 draft, there was a TON of activity at the end of the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 They're interested in Chad Greenway and DeMarco Ryans. Ryans has a shot to be there at 29, not Greenway though. That's another possible option. Also a CB like Kelly Jennings could be around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Brick at 4, Mangold at 29, McNeill at 35 would be a killing. 3rd rounder can be used on Sinorice Moss if we really need a WR, he will probably drop that far. I want MJ Gilles, but I doubt we can get him. We really need an RT though this draft. Jones and Kendall will probably be our guards this year, so we can do without Gilles anyway. 3rd round for WR or RB. Comp picks used to flesh out some positions, like NT, and get a bit of depth. Then we just hope Pennington comes back strong or Ramsey can turn the corner, if not, we draft a QB next year so all will work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Brick at 4, Mangold at 29, McNeill at 35 would be a killing. 3rd rounder can be used on Sinorice Moss if we really need a WR, he will probably drop that far. I want MJ Gilles, but I doubt we can get him. We really need an RT though this draft. Jones and Kendall will probably be our guards this year, so we can do without Gilles anyway. 3rd round for WR or RB. Comp picks used to flesh out some positions, like NT, and get a bit of depth. Then we just hope Pennington comes back strong or Ramsey can turn the corner, if not, we draft a QB next year so all will work out. Jean-Gilles will be there at 29, but it's likely that Seattle will take him at 31 if we don't pick him there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Are we back to the Max Jean-Giles bull**** again? We have Kendall and Moore, we are not taking Giles. Case closed. People are very strange with thinking we would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CluJet Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Jean-Gilles will be there at 29, but it's likely that Seattle will take him at 31 if we don't pick him there. We don't really need a guard yet. Kendall is extended, and Moore should be fine. What we need is a starting center and a tackle, as well as depth at G and T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Jean-Gilles will be there at 29, but it's likely that Seattle will take him at 31 if we don't pick him there. If Jones can make the move to Center, then I'd take MJ in a heartbeat at our 29. Then our line would be Brick, Kendall, Jones, Gilles and I'd think McNeill if we can get him, although I don't know if he will make it to 35. It's hard to project, but I think if Jones makes the transition, and the rookies learn, our line would be a force for years. I don't think they'd be any good until halfway through next season at the earliest though, but that would be true for any 5 players we pick that are new to each other I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Mangini is a defensive coach - i would not forget that- expect him to use at least one of these picks on defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmart28Coles87 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If Jones can make the move to Center, then I'd take MJ in a heartbeat at our 29. Then our line would be Brick, Kendall, Jones, Gilles and I'd think McNeill if we can get him, although I don't know if he will make it to 35. It's hard to project, but I think if Jones makes the transition, and the rookies learn, our line would be a force for years. I don't think they'd be any good until halfway through next season at the earliest though, but that would be true for any 5 players we pick that are new to each other I think. Jones is not moving to Center period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmart28Coles87 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 At 4 I want to take either D Brick or Hawk and at 29 I wanna take Mangold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Mangini is a defensive coach - i would not forget that- expect him to use at least one of these picks on defense I don't think that really matters. Billick was an offensive coach, but he pretty much went all defense. When you know you have a strength on one side, you try and get the better players for the other side. The offense NEEDS to reload this year, and I think Mangini knows that and will try to take care of it. Defensively we'll be fine if D-Rob reaches his potential this year, and Ellis bounces back and plays well. Vilma anchors the LB, but we have enough mediocre talent around him to play a good scheme. I think defensively we will be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Anyone thinking that if Mr.Kelly's Vikings trade rumors are true that we now could have 5 picks in The Top 50? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saints Fan in Austin Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 It's hard to make a guess here. For all we know we might not even own this pick by next week. Yea...it could belong to the Saint! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Anyone thinking that if Mr.Kelly's Vikings trade rumors are true that we now could have 5 picks in The Top 50? I'm hoping they are true. 5 picks in the top 50 and 7 on day one. Plus don't we pick #1 in the 4th round? That is always a hot spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Yea...it could belong to the Saint! If we trade our 4th overall and 29th overall to you guys for Leinart I'm going to have make a few new holes in the wall. Seriously. What a freakin' waste and setback of the franchise for years to come even more if we do something that stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.