Blackout Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 aikmen-emmit-irvin montana-craig-rice kelly-thomas-reed brady-moss-welker bradshaw-harris-swann young-rice-t.o. (granted they never made it to a superbowl together) but my personal favorite was Warner/Faulk/Bruce/Holt because that's a 4some (insert dirty joke here) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Aikmen-Emmit-Irvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYjet10 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Clemens-Cotchery-Jones well my future pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Off-season-thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Lemon-Chatman-Booker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 Off-season-thread it IS the offseason as far as im concerned has been since week 5 or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 What about Culpepper-Moss-Carter? Or whoever you want to be in there as the third. Or maybe Elway-TD-Smith? I thought those were worthy mentions. I might be off a little on them I admit, maybe you don't want to consider it threes and just take the first 2, but those were both great offenses for a year or two each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Aikman,Emmitt & Irving or Montana,Craig & Rice...The rest don't compare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Clemens-Cotchery-Jones well my future pick You mean Clemens-Cotchery-McFadden ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LWC611 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 You mean Clemens-Cotchery-McFadden ? Well that is probably not going to happen now.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LWC611 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 aikmen-emmit-irvin montana-craig-rice kelly-thomas-reed brady-moss-welker bradshaw-harris-swann young-rice-t.o. (granted they never made it to a superbowl together) but my personal favorite was Warner/Faulk/Bruce/Holt because that's a 4some I am partial to: Fouts/Muncie/Winslow/chandler/Joiner now that's a fiver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Gale Sayers, all by himself. Run, catch, returns. Sayers was what Bush was supposed to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Namath/Maynard/Snell Not too shabby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 I am partial to: Fouts/Muncie/Winslow/chandler/Joiner now that's a fiver well i could add Az Hakim to the Rams team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 You mean Clemens-Cotchery-McFadden ? HELL YEAH!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer76 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 As an offensive threat, Kelly-Thomas-Reed was ridiculous. They never won a SB, but they were just as good as any offensive trio IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 As an offensive threat, Kelly-Thomas-Reed was ridiculous. They never won a SB, but they were just as good as any offensive trio IMO. they weren't as good as aikmen-emmit-irvin though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer76 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 they weren't as good as aikmen-emmit-irvin though Having seen both offenses in their prime firsthand, I disagree. Thomas may not have had Emmit's rushing numbers, but he was Marshall Faulk before there was ever Marshall Faulk. The guy was a huge threat all by himself in both the rushing and passing game. He revolutionized the game tremendously. BUF had a much more aggressive offense than DAL did. I'm not saying DAL was not great, I just personally feel as a trio BUF eeks it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 Having seen both offenses in their prime firsthand, I disagree. Thomas may not have had Emmit's rushing numbers, but he was Marshall Faulk before there was ever Marshall Faulk. The guy was a huge threat all by himself in both the rushing and passing game. He revolutionized the game tremendously. BUF had a much more aggressive offense than DAL did. I'm not saying DAL was not great, I just personally feel as a trio BUF eeks it out. 3 superbowl wins > 4 losses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Manning-Harrison-Wayne???? Manning-Harrison-Edge???? Manning-Wayne-Addai???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.