CobraVerde Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 theres no way you bench Geno tomorrow no matter what...if Rex benches Geno for Simms not only will i flip the f out but id be so pissed for Simms especially if he didnt get reps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewillie78 Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 theres no way you bench Geno tomorrow no matter what...if Rex benches Geno for Simms not only will i flip the f out but id be so pissed for Simms especially if he didnt get reps... When Geno is lets say 4-13 72 yards, 2 picks, 2 lost fumbles and sporting a 9.3 TQBR at the HALF, he either benches GENO , or use the only other plausible option: QUIT, and not come out for the 2nd half. Your choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 not gonna happen ive been a geno basher all year but it's revenge of the turd tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewillie78 Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 not gonna happen ive been a geno basher all year but it's revenge of the turd tomorrow Have you said the same thing for each of the past 3 weeks, because I have basically said after each disaster that "their is no way GENO can be as bad as last week", and darned if he doesnt prove me wrong again. If Geno puts up at least a double figure TQBR, it will be an improvement over last week. Woo, talk about LOWERING the bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorge o8 Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 lets not forget sanchez had playmakers on O his first 2 years and had a very good oline so give this year as get the mistakes out kick ass next year with some talent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 not gonna happen ive been a geno basher all year but it's revenge of the turd tomorrow we will lose this game most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 we will lose this game most likely. Part of me expects us to dominate. It's the perfect time to re-invigorate the fanbase with hope, just so that in the following weeks leading up to Christmas it can all be crushed again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deucebag Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 Geno will have a solid game today. Jets 31 Raiders 13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 Even though the Raiders have won recently they are the perfect team for a QB to have a good day against. If smith fails here he is done. Suspect he will have a decent day, Jets win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 If the Jets were serious about pushing for the playoffs, and (big if!) if Garrard has anything in the tank at all, then Garrard should've been inserted into the starting lineup two weeks ago. But I don't get the impression that the Jets as an organization were ever as focused on those potential wins as they are on learning what they have in Geno and, to a lesser extent, Simms. Makes me think that the QB decision isn't coming from the coaching staff at this point as much as it's coming from the front office. I also think Geno is only starting this week because they see the Raiders as a weak opponent, and that it may give Geno a chance to get his confidence back. If he doesn't play significantly better in the first half of this game, though, I don't think they'll hesitate to pull him and give Simms a chance to show what he can do against this allegedly lower level of competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 If the Jets were serious about pushing for the playoffs, and (big if!) if Garrard has anything in the tank at all, then Garrard should've been inserted into the starting lineup two weeks ago. But I don't get the impression that the Jets as an organization were ever as focused on those potential wins as they are on learning what they have in Geno and, to a lesser extent, Simms. Makes me think that the QB decision isn't coming from the coaching staff at this point as much as it's coming from the front office. I also think Geno is only starting this week because they see the Raiders as a weak opponent, and that it may give Geno a chance to get his confidence back. If he doesn't play significantly better in the first half of this game, though, I don't think they'll hesitate to pull him and give Simms a chance to show what he can do against this allegedly lower level of competition. That's exactly where I am, too. If he sucks today, he's going to suck the rest of the year and any attempt to "fix" him will have to occur in the offseason, anyway. They need to try and win the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexiRoll6 Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 If the Jets were serious about pushing for the playoffs, and (big if!) if Garrard has anything in the tank at all, then Garrard should've been inserted into the starting lineup two weeks ago. But I don't get the impression that the Jets as an organization were ever as focused on those potential wins as they are on learning what they have in Geno and, to a lesser extent, Simms. Makes me think that the QB decision isn't coming from the coaching staff at this point as much as it's coming from the front office. I also think Geno is only starting this week because they see the Raiders as a weak opponent, and that it may give Geno a chance to get his confidence back. If he doesn't play significantly better in the first half of this game, though, I don't think they'll hesitate to pull him and give Simms a chance to show what he can do against this allegedly lower level of competition. PLAYOFFS????!!! Playoffs?, You're talking about ...playoffs? Jets just want to win a game. Playoffs, what world do you live on? Maybe you have been in Ethiopia somewhere and didn't know the Jets have lost three straight...and BADLY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SickJetFan Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 we will lose this game most likely. whats the point of winning at this point - put the bottom of your roster in for the rest of the season and see what you have. they lose like this next year there will be a lynch mob at the games next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 PLAYOFFS????!!! Playoffs?, You're talking about ...playoffs? Jets just want to win a game. Playoffs, what world do you live on? Maybe you have been in Ethiopia somewhere and didn't know the Jets have lost three straight...and BADLY. Read the first sentence of my post again, one trick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted December 8, 2013 Share Posted December 8, 2013 Have you said the same thing for each of the past 3 weeks, because I have basically said after each disaster that "their is no way GENO can be as bad as last week", and darned if he doesnt prove me wrong again. actually i was the other way didn't think the Jets would win another game all year but this week with the Raiders travelling east for a 1pm start... and the season basically "over" this is the type of game they win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewillie78 Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 actually i was the other way didn't think the Jets would win another game all year but this week with the Raiders travelling east for a 1pm start... and the season basically "over" this is the type of game they win Congratulations, Spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.