Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Make a trade offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 Make a trade offer. Funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallinPB Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Make a trade offer. lol lets trade garbage for hot garbage. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Buffalo Bills coach Doug Marrone announced Monday that Kyle Orton will be the team's Week 5 starting quarterback, benching EJ Manuel. Around The NFL will have more on this story shortly. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000403000/article/bills-marrone-kyle-orton-to-start-week-5-ej-manuel-benched so jealous of bills fans right now. in other news sammy watkins stock gonna soar on my fantasy team! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 lol lets trade garbage for hot garbage. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk We're getting the garbage and they're getting the hot garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kay_gee Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 you're jealous of a franchise that is about to move to kyle orton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 The Bills have benched E.J. Manuel for Kyle Orton. After a seemingly promising 2-0 start where Buffalo "hid" Manuel by playing good defense and featuring the run game, the bottom fell out on E.J. the past two weeks. Through four weeks, he had completed just 58 percent of his passes with a 6.40 yards-per-attempt average. He took five sacks the past two weeks and threw a pair of interceptions in Sunday's loss to the Texans. Already 24 years old, Manuel is clearly best suited as an NFL backup. He often lacked confidence and poise on the field, and accuracy was always a major issue for Manuel dating back to his time at Florida State. Orton will be utilized similarly, as a game manager. He's worth grabbing as a low-ceiling option in two-quarterback leagues. We do suspect Orton gives Buffalo a better chance at feeding Sammy Watkins the rock than Manuel did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Geno >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manuel Manuel sucks. Do not go to FSU for a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallinPB Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 We're getting the garbage and they're getting the hot garbage. I disagree. Geno can make plays and the turnovers kill him. EJ can't make the plays Geno can make. Either way we are talking about garbage so what does it matter. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 you're jealous of a franchise that is about to move to kyle orton? always liked orton a lot actually. thought he got a raw deal everywhere he has been. he was a game manager plus, which in my mind makes him about average for an nfl starter, and an underrated player. who knows if he has lost some game in the last couple years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton wouldn't be terrible here. Better than Geno and Vick. But we need headlines, not stability at the QB position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton > Vick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 always liked orton a lot actually. thought he got a raw deal everywhere he has been. he was a game manager plus, which in my mind makes him about average for an nfl starter, and an underrated player. who knows if he has lost some game in the last couple years. Think about why he's been on so many teams and that kind of answers itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton > Vick agree. i wanted jets to get him for last two off seasons. but sadly, the front office doesn't listen to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton > Vick Doesn't matter if either were any good they would have gotten starting jobs. Especially with all the terrible qbs in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Think about why he's been on so many teams and that kind of answers itself. i said i thought he was under rated, not joe montana. and getting bounced from team to team was part of the raw deal i was referring to. remember he filled in admirably for injured rex grossman then rex came back and he was benched despite winning something like 8 games out of 9 and getting to playoffs, then he went to denver, i believe after cutler went to chicago, and also played some decent ball before tebow time, then sat behind romo a couple years. probably screwing up the timeline. i actually am looking forward to seeing him play. oh and he also loves jack daniels and looks like a homeless person. double win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton > Vick Agreed. Orton was the guy I was saying we should have gotten back in the summertime... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Doesn't matter if either were any good they would have gotten starting jobs. Especially with all the terrible qbs in the league. Orton was just given a starting job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton was just given a starting job. That was the basic premise of these thread no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 And Vick may be given one soon also. Doesn't mean either are good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Agreed. Orton was the guy I was saying we should have gotten back in the summertime... me and you both, brother. group hug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 And Vick may be given one soon also. Doesn't mean either are good. You're the one that said "if either was good, they've be given starting jobs". Don't blame me if you don't understand the logic implied by your own statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 i said i thought he was under rated, not joe montana. and getting bounced from team to team was part of the raw deal i was referring to. remember he filled in admirably for injured rex grossman then rex came back and he was benched despite winning something like 8 games out of 9 and getting to playoffs, then he went to denver, i believe after cutler went to chicago, and also played some decent ball before tebow time, then sat behind romo a couple years. probably screwing up the timeline. i actually am looking forward to seeing him play. oh and he also loves jack daniels and looks like a homeless person. double win. His run of nice games in Chicago was like 10 years ago. He hasn't started more than 5 games in the past four years. His career numbers are very Geno Smith-esque. He hasn't gotten a raw deal. He just hasn't been all that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 His run of nice games in Chicago was like 10 years ago. He hasn't started more than 5 games in the past four years. His career numbers are very Geno Smith-esque. He hasn't gotten a raw deal. He just hasn't been all that good. maybe not, i still always liked him. will be fun to see him play again. think you're off a bit on the geno comparisons though. career td/int is 83/59. if jets got that out of a qb we'd be all over his jock lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 You're the one that said "if either was good, they've be given starting jobs". Don't blame me if you don't understand the logic implied by your own statement. Either you are dumb or just playing dumb. You know exactly what I meant. They both went into the season as the backup. Since I do not think you are dumb, why do u feel the need to be so antagonistic? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Orton > Vick Tebow>>>>>>>>>Orton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Tebow>>>>>>>>>Orton meh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Either you are dumb or just playing dumb. You know exactly what I meant. They both went into the season as the backup. Since I do not think you are dumb, why do u feel the need to be so antagonistic? ? every year there are teams that want to try out high upside youngsters over known quantity veterans; the best 32 QBs in the league never correlate exactly to the 32 starters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 every year there are teams that want to try out high upside youngsters over known quantity veterans; the best 32 QBs in the league never correlate exactly to the 32 starters. While this does happen, mostly the high upside youngster could sit behind either of these 2 guys if the teams felt that either game them a legit chance to win now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 While this does happen, mostly the high upside youngster could sit behind either of these 2 guys if the teams felt that either game them a legit chance to win now. teams are often wrong, and if adults are in charge, they can admit it and make a switch. hell buffalo has a better record than us, used an earlier pick on EJ, and made the move. vick/orton probably about a push. i might give the edge to orton (less mistake prone) but probably half the people feel the other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 Bortles and Bridgewater are only starting because of injuries. I truly believe that if teams thought Vick or Orton could give them a legit shot to win then they would have signed them. Orton has barely played in the last 3 years. And when Vick played he was at times dynamic but a turnover machine much like the one we want to see benched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Bortles and Bridgewater are only starting because of injuries. I truly believe that if teams thought Vick or Orton could give them a legit shot to win then they would have signed them. Orton has barely played in the last 3 years. And when Vick played he was at times dynamic but a turnover machine much like the one we want to see benched. congratulations, you have proven that teams can make mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 meh... Meh, sure, but still true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Because of course that was the year we'd draft a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.