Jump to content

"It must be a Wednesday..." Edition of POTW - December 6, 2006


GreenBeans

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nothing at all. Hey, I'm a live and let live kinda guy. To each his own. But there comes a point where it goes into overkill. HEY EVERYBODY! LOOK! AND HERE'S A PICTURE OF A CHICK SITTING ON A TOILET BOWL! AND GUESS WHAT! THAT'S MY BELT SHE'S LOOSENING!

I mean, what are we, in 8th grade here?

SHE'S PULLING DOWN MY PANTS NOW! SHE'S GONNA SUCK IT!

Actually, I was wrong about penicillin.

More like a series of rabies shots.

HAHAHAHAHA, yeah, you exposed me, good job, and thanks for letting me know it's overkill. You can now go back and take your seat on the JN morals and ethics committee.

There is always a hater and an @ssh@le in every group, you are just efficient, taking both roles for yourself, good on ya!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHAHAHAHA, yeah, you exposed me, good job, and thanks for letting me know it's overkill. You can now go back and take your seat on the JN morals and ethics committee.

There is always a hater and an @ssh@le in every group, you are just efficient, taking both roles for yourself, good on ya!

Hey Joe, I'll spell it out for you. I don't access my computer in a dark movie theatre, I keep it in what the other members of my household call "the family room".

I don't need my 15 year old daughter or her friends looking over my shoulder and seeing your filth, and then having to explain what any of it has to do with football or the NY Jets, just so you can pander too and indulge a bunch of nerds who wear a raincoat and keep a newspaper in their lap as they surf the internet.

Just tone it a down a bit. Thats not asking alot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an idea. Now hear me out. Some posters don't want to see the pics. Me included - no offense, Joe. It's just not my thing. Anyway, maybe this pic posting - and I know many of you like it - can be put on it's own forum. That way, all that enjoy the visual tease can have at it, and those that do not, will not. I know that the "site that shall not be named" has some "hotties" forum thing going on. Create a new forum. Name it "Silly Horny Men" or "Joe's Place" or "Porn Pen."

Just an idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Joe, I'll spell it out for you. I don't access my computer in a dark movie theatre, I keep it in what the other members of my household call "the family room".

I don't need my 15 year old daughter or her friends looking over my shoulder and seeing your filth, and then having to explain what any of it has to do with football or the NY Jets, just so you can pander too and indulge a bunch of nerds who wear a raincoat and keep a newspaper in their lap as they surf the internet.

Just tone it a down a bit. Thats not asking alot.

Interesting.

My non-Jets, non-football threads always gets locked, but the porno thread just keeps going like the Energizer bunny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Joe, I'll spell it out for you. I don't access my computer in a dark movie theatre, I keep it in what the other members of my household call "the family room".

I don't need my 15 year old daughter or her friends looking over my shoulder and seeing your filth, and then having to explain what any of it has to do with football or the NY Jets, just so you can pander too and indulge a bunch of nerds who wear a raincoat and keep a newspaper in their lap as they surf the internet.

Just tone it a down a bit. Thats not asking alot.

Hey Joe, I'll spell it out for you. I don't access my computer in a dark movie theatre, I keep it in what the other members of my household call "the family room".

I don't need my 15 year old daughter or her friends looking over my shoulder and seeing your filth, and then having to explain what any of it has to do with football or the NY Jets, just so you can pander too and indulge a bunch of nerds who wear a raincoat and keep a newspaper in their lap as they surf the internet.

Just tone it a down a bit. Thats not asking alot.

I wasn't the one to start posting pics of the JN model, do a little research. And is anything I posted worse then a picture of vida in a thong, or anyof the other random pics posted on here?Lets not be dramatic here with the filth comments, the victoria's secret show on network tv this week was more riskee then anything I have posted here.

And dude, just because you choose to go on the internet in the "family room" does not mean that the entirety of the internet is obligated to conform to what you decide is decent. You can't find one single bit of any type of nudity in anything I have ever posted or linked to, go ahead and give it a look, although I wil bet you probably have checked out all my links already a few times.

There is a great tool here that anyone can use to tune out anyone they feel is offensive, or overly boring, and that is the ignore feature, feel free to ignore away, I am sure that will keep you and your family away from the "whore-able" pervs and raincoaters clogging up the internet.

Anyway, there is really nowhere else to go with this arguement, the mods know I am totally cool with whatever they want, I am here as a jets fan. I am not pandering or trying to drum up any business, the links are to free myspace pages, and I am proud of the fact that at 30 I am building a business of my own on my own, if it was my own financial consulting company I would do the same. Try finding a link anywhere to get people to spend money on anything, you won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't the one to start posting pics of the JN model, do a little research. And is anything I posted worse then a picture of vida in a thong, or anyof the other random pics posted on here?Lets not be dramatic here with the filth comments, the victoria's secret show on network tv this week was more riskee then anything I have posted here.

And dude, just because you choose to go on the internet in the "family room" does not mean that the entirety of the internet is obligated to conform to what you decide is decent. You can't find one single bit of any type of nudity in anything I have ever posted or linked to, go ahead and give it a look, although I wil bet you probably have checked out all my links already a few times.

There is a great tool here that anyone can use to tune out anyone they feel is offensive, or overly boring, and that is the ignore feature, feel free to ignore away, I am sure that will keep you and your family away from the "whore-able" pervs and raincoaters clogging up the internet.

Anyway, there is really nowhere else to go with this arguement, the mods know I am totally cool with whatever they want, I am here as a jets fan. I am not pandering or trying to drum up any business, the links are to free myspace pages, and I am proud of the fact that at 30 I am building a business of my own on my own, if it was my own financial consulting company I would do the same. Try finding a link anywhere to get people to spend money on anything, you won't.

Joe, I can't argue with anything you said. You made your case for yourself. I got nothing against you personally, and I certainly wasn't trying to create an "issue" out of this. When you go public with your business, you should steel yourself to criticism. Calling me a "fag" because I made a comment about one of your "models" (after seeing her picture for the umpteenth time) simply escalated things to the point they are at, now. I hear what you are saying about the Vida pic. I know some posters from time to time have had risque AVATARs. I'd find myself having to scroll real fast, and not even read their post, if my family was around. It was a minor inconvenience. But lately, it just seems like every thread has soft porn in it. It's not enough to disable avatars or sig pics, because it's people cutting and pasting them. Then responding to them, and on an on.

I'm not a prude. :) It just gets to the point where it's annoying. Let me put it too you this way-

If it was a Jesus freak, and not a porn hustler doing it, how long you think that poster would last? It's not a hypothetical situation, it's a real case. His name was Sackdance99 and he was banned in less than 48 hours for having pictures of Jesus in his signature.

I'm not going to disable sig pics, because it's a big part ofwhat gives this MB it's personality. So I really have no choice but to put you on ignore. And I think it's a shame because you are a good poster. I certainly don't want to ruin anybody elses fun, neither.

All I ask is you tone down the actual cutting and pasting, because like I said, then every thread gets polluted with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not a locked thread that you smell, it's joebaby's fingers

hey dna, I can't believe jetmoses called us out like that. In my defense, i umm have a leaky roof so it's not uncommon for me to wear a raincoat around the house. I surf the internet to better educate myself on many topics, sometimes porn pops up for some unwarranted reason. I usually happen to be working the daily crossword puzzle in the newspaper at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe, I can't argue with anything you said. You made your case for yourself. I got nothing against you personally, and I certainly wasn't trying to create an "issue" out of this. When you go public with your business, you should steel yourself to criticism. Calling me a "fag" because I made a comment about one of your "models" (after seeing her picture for the umpteenth time) simply escalated things to the point they are at, now. I hear what you are saying about the Vida pic. I know some posters from time to time have had risque AVATARs. I'd find myself having to scroll real fast, and not even read their post, if my family was around. It was a minor inconvenience. But lately, it just seems like every thread has soft porn in it. It's not enough to disable avatars or sig pics, because it's people cutting and pasting them. Then responding to them, and on an on.

I'm not a prude. :) It just gets to the point where it's annoying. Let me put it too you this way-

If it was a Jesus freak, and not a porn hustler doing it, how long you think that poster would last? It's not a hypothetical situation, it's a real case. His name was Sackdance99 and he was banned in less than 48 hours for having pictures of Jesus in his signature.

I'm not going to disable sig pics, because it's a big part ofwhat gives this MB it's personality. So I really have no choice but to put you on ignore. And I think it's a shame because you are a good poster. I certainly don't want to ruin anybody elses fun, neither.

All I ask is you tone down the actual cutting and pasting, because like I said, then every thread gets polluted with them.

Fair enough dude.

Truth be told, I didn't even want anyone to know it was me that those JN model pics came from, I did it for the board, I was gonna give Max a copy without my logo on the bottom, but I guess he just couldn't wait to share with the gang, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was a Jesus freak, and not a porn hustler doing it, how long you think that poster would last? It's not a hypothetical situation, it's a real case. His name was Sackdance99 and he was banned in less than 48 hours for having pictures of Jesus in his signature.

Do you know for a fact that's why he was banned? I always thought it was because he made a habit of dumping his religious beliefs on everyone whether they wanted to hear them or not and telling everyone that they were going to burn in hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know for a fact that's why he was banned? I always thought it was because he made a habit of dumping his religious beliefs on everyone whether they wanted to hear them or not and telling everyone that they were going to burn in hell.

The point is, nobody suggested the offended party put Sackdance99 on ignore. He was simply booted. And for the record, I'm not condoning his behavior or dismissing it, just pointing that out. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know for a fact that's why he was banned? I always thought it was because he made a habit of dumping his religious beliefs on everyone whether they wanted to hear them or not and telling everyone that they were going to burn in hell.

I think i remember that, i wasn't a very active poster back then, but i remember that clown. He would have loved me for sure. My welcoming party to the seventh level of hell is already being planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought there was a rule that Hermisms couldn't win POTW anymore.

Way to stick to your guns.;)

Yeah, well, that's true and I considered that for a while. Sperm's post was just too funny to deny, but you're right - I did say that a while back.

PS - I'm still scared of you. More so now. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, well, that's true and I considered that for a while. Sperm's post was just too funny to deny, but you're right - I did say that a while back.

PS - I'm still scared of you. More so now. ;)

Unless your wife is an underaged hooker, you have no need to fear me.

PS- You know what else sticks to Guns?

Doughnuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was a Jesus freak, and not a porn hustler doing it, how long you think that poster would last? It's not a hypothetical situation, it's a real case. His name was Sackdance99 and he was banned in less than 48 hours for having pictures of Jesus in his signature.

Hey JetMo --

I want to address this. I B.S. here a lot, always screwing around etc. Everything I am about to type is the God's honest truth.

First of all Joe shouldn't have made a fag joke. That's not cool. I am the one to blame for these pictures though. I assumed that certain people who were offended would just shut off pics under the User CP. Having read your post, I see the other side of it and I will make an effort to make sure that sort of stuff gets toned down. Or at least isolated to threads that can be easily ignored.

Back on topic, SD99 was banned rather quickly. Why was he banned? I don't remember him posting a Jesus picture. He might have but he did start a religious thread which I know I deleted. He only had 8 posts and he came over here with an agenda to promote JI. He was not here to talk Jets football. We had enough drama going on.

http://www.jetnation.com/forums/showpost.php?p=102476&postcount=13

http://www.jetnation.com/forums/showthread.php?p=102198#post102198

http://www.jetnation.com/forums/showthread.php?p=102339#post102339

Anyhow I think Bernie is a good guy. I actually talked to him on email last week. We did a link exchange with the JMAC site that he runs. But that is not the point. The point is that I am a Christian. But we decided to keep that out of the mix. If I see a post here blasting Jesus Christ I am going to lose my mind. I would go on a banning spree. It really doesn't do us any good, since we are a football site. So that is why we keep politics and religion out of the mix. Bernie's name and ip address are not banned currently. He is welcome to post here if he wants to talk football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyhow that is not the point. The point is that I am a Christian. But we decided to keep that out of the mix. If I see a post here blasting Jesus Christ I am going to lose my mind. I would go on a banning spree.

Jesus saves! Gretzky gets the rebound and scores!!!

Peace out, homies. It was fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey JetMo --

I want to address this. I B.S. here a lot, always screwing around etc. Everything I am about to type is the God's honest truth.

First of all Joe shouldn't have made a fag joke. That's not cool. I am the one to blame for these pictures though. I assumed that certain people who were offended would just shut off pics under the User CP. Having read your post, I see the other side of it and I will make an effort to make sure that sort of stuff gets toned down. Or at least isolated to threads that can be easily ignored.

Back on topic, SD99 was banned rather quickly. Why was he banned? I don't remember him posting a Jesus picture. He might have but he did start a religious thread which I know I deleted. He only had 8 posts and he came over here with an agenda to promote JI. He was not here to talk Jets football. We had enough drama going on.

http://www.jetnation.com/forums/showpost.php?p=102476&postcount=13

http://www.jetnation.com/forums/showthread.php?p=102198#post102198

http://www.jetnation.com/forums/showthread.php?p=102339#post102339

Anyhow I think Bernie is a good guy. I actually talked to him on email last week. We did a link exchange with the JMAC site that he runs. But that is not the point. The point is that I am a Christian. But we decided to keep that out of the mix. If I see a post here blasting Jesus Christ I am going to lose my mind. I would go on a banning spree. It really doesn't do us any good, since we are a football site. So that is why we keep politics and religion out of the mix. Bernie's name and ip address are not banned currently. He is welcome to post here if he wants to talk football.

Max, I certainly wasn't trying to make a big deal out of this, so let's set the story straight.

JoeBaby has a business and he wants to promote it. Fine. I don't care one way or the other, nor should I. But when I've scrolled through a thread for the hundredth time and see a picture of a slut sitting on a toilet bowl pulling some guys pants down when I'm trying to read about the Jets, I start to get annoyed.

If somebody wants to make their product public, then they should steel themselves to criticism. I try to keep my comments to myself, but sometimes I can't resist. Even you thought the "Russian syphillus" and "pennicilin" rejoinders were funny. Green Beans even put me in POTW. Of course, Joe didn't like it, so he calls me a "fag". Whatever.

The point is, everything I said after that, about having to navigate the MB with other members of my family in the room and what not, is nothing new. I've always had to deal with that, as I'm sure everybody else has, from time to time, at home or at work. I never complained to you or any Mods or too the individual with the kinky pics. Never. The only reason it became a public issue now is because Joe must think he's Larry Flynt, giving me a lecture about censorship and the first amendment.

You know what I think the problem is, Max? The snowball effect-

Somebody makes a kinky 150X150 pixel AVATAR. The monkey see monkey do crowd then uploads a 250X250 pixel kinky sig pic. Then somebody has to trump that with something even more graphic. And it just gets smuttier and smuttier, and nobody wants to say anything because they might be a called a "fag". What it is is when you have a board saturated with graphic images, all it takes is that one more image that breaks the camels back.

I know it's a fine line you guys have to walk.

I just wanted it made clear that I didn't complain to anybody about anything, nor am I trying to change anybody or censor anybody and I resent anyone trying to suggest that I am.

And Joe? Honestly, I don't think the Vida Guerra picture is all that bad. Over the top? Yeah, I think the guy could shrink it a bit. But Joe, it's not porn. I've sent postcards from Brasil (yes, thats how they spell it, Max ;)) of girls on the beach, similar to that picture. If it was porn, I'm sure the FBI would have contacted me. If I'm reading through a thread, and I scroll down and come across that Sig Pic at the very moment my daughter or my wife is standing over my shoulder asking me if they can check their email, I'm annoyed, a little embarrassed, but I'm not upset. When the same thing happens as I'm scrolling a thread and see a chick sitting on a toilet bowl, pulling a guys pants down, well...

Call me old fashioned, but yeah, it upsets me.

In the end, I don't want to have an adverse effect on anybody, and I'm not trying to squash anybodies freedom of expression, or cage up their personality. We're just having a conversation here, thats all.

Peace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JetMo --

We are cool. And I understand exactly what you are saying. I appreciate the feedback you gave, more importantly the manner in which you gave it. I will work towards toning things down a bit.

As far as all the other stuff goes, don't mind me. My flow is just a bit heavier this month than usual. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max, I certainly wasn't trying to make a big deal out of this, so let's set the story straight.

JoeBaby has a business and he wants to promote it. Fine. I don't care one way or the other, nor should I. But when I've scrolled through a thread for the hundredth time and see a picture of a slut sitting on a toilet bowl pulling some guys pants down when I'm trying to read about the Jets, I start to get annoyed.

If somebody wants to make their product public, then they should steel themselves to criticism. I try to keep my comments to myself, but sometimes I can't resist. Even you thought the "Russian syphillus" and "pennicilin" rejoinders were funny. Green Beans even put me in POTW. Of course, Joe didn't like it, so he calls me a "fag". Whatever.

The point is, everything I said after that, about having to navigate the MB with other members of my family in the room and what not, is nothing new. I've always had to deal with that, as I'm sure everybody else has, from time to time, at home or at work. I never complained to you or any Mods or too the individual with the kinky pics. Never. The only reason it became a public issue now is because Joe must think he's Larry Flynt, giving me a lecture about censorship and the first amendment.

You know what I think the problem is, Max? The snowball effect-

Somebody makes a kinky 150X150 pixel AVATAR. The monkey see monkey do crowd then uploads a 250X250 pixel kinky sig pic. Then somebody has to trump that with something even more graphic. And it just gets smuttier and smuttier, and nobody wants to say anything because they might be a called a "fag". What it is is when you have a board saturated with graphic images, all it takes is that one more image that breaks the camels back.

I know it's a fine line you guys have to walk.

I just wanted it made clear that I didn't complain to anybody about anything, nor am I trying to change anybody or censor anybody and I resent anyone trying to suggest that I am.

And Joe? Honestly, I don't think the Vida Guerra picture is all that bad. Over the top? Yeah, I think the guy could shrink it a bit. But Joe, it's not porn. I've sent postcards from Brasil (yes, thats how they spell it, Max ;)) of girls on the beach, similar to that picture. If it was porn, I'm sure the FBI would have contacted me. If I'm reading through a thread, and I scroll down and come across that Sig Pic at the very moment my daughter or my wife is standing over my shoulder asking me if they can check their email, I'm annoyed, a little embarrassed, but I'm not upset. When the same thing happens as I'm scrolling a thread and see a chick sitting on a toilet bowl, pulling a guys pants down, well...

Call me old fashioned, but yeah, it upsets me.

In the end, I don't want to have an adverse effect on anybody, and I'm not trying to squash anybodies freedom of expression, or cage up their personality. We're just having a conversation here, thats all.

Peace.

I thought this was deaded the other day???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and about the Sackdance99 comparison.

The only point I was making was-

not one person who was complaining about Bernie's posts was told to "just put him on ignore".

I hear you. Truth be told -- the original owners of the site voted on whether to ban him or not. I voted to not ban him. But the pro-ban him group had it 2 to 1.

(And that is not me just B.S.ing -- I am actually being truthful this time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But when I've scrolled through a thread for the hundredth time and see a picture of a slut sitting on a toilet bowl pulling some guys pants down when I'm trying to read about the Jets, I start to get annoyed.

Is that any way to talk about Tx while he takes a dump with his Brady doll?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...