The Gun Of Bavaria Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 There, I said it. Stick a fork in him, he's done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowmoe57 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 His rising star flamed out fast - Faster then Goodens and w/out the drugs. - so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeebers Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 His rising star flamed out fast - Faster then Goodens and w/out the drugs. - so far D. Willis was never in Doc's class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowmoe57 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 D. Willis was never in Doc's class. So true but he was going to be the next big thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 He could probably revive his career in the bullpen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gun Of Bavaria Posted March 2, 2009 Author Share Posted March 2, 2009 He could probably revive his career in the bullpen. I agree. Why the Tigers are continuing the starter experiment is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I agree. Why the Tigers are continuing the starter experiment is beyond me. Talk about falling like a rock !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdropOFvenom Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 He was abused badly by the Marlins over the years and his arm doesn't have the same life to it that it used to now. Add in his control steadily declining the last 4 years and that was a trainwreck in the making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Cut him so the Sox can claim their latest reclamation project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 I agree. Why the Tigers are continuing the starter experiment is beyond me. Try him as a closer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adb280z Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 He was abused badly by the Marlins Nonsense. Even if you believe in pitch counts and innings pitched limits (which I strongly do not) he was not abused in any way. 2002 - 160 IP 2003 - 196 IP 2004 - 197 IP 2005 - 236 IP 2006 - 223 IP That's fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Now I don't feel so bad that we once traded him for Antonio Alfonseca. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrissey Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Now I don't feel so bad that we once traded him for Antonio Alfonseca. You should still feel bad... Cubbies probably would of been in the World Series in 2003. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 You should still feel bad... Cubbies probably would of been in the World Series in 2003. IIRC, Willis pitched like **** against the Cubs. I think he was on the mound when Aramis hit the grand slam. I could be wrong, though, as I've spent five years trying to block that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrissey Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 IIRC, Willis pitched like **** against the Cubs. I think he was on the mound when Aramis hit the grand slam. I could be wrong, though, as I've spent five years trying to block that out. You're right.. he was awful in game 4. 2.1 IP- 6 ER, 3 H, 5 BB, 1 HR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 You're right.. he was awful in game 4. 2.1 IP- 6 ER, 3 H, 5 BB, 1 HR Even so, Marlins probably don't make the playoffs without him. So, we'd have probably choked against the Giants instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrissey Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Even so, Marlins probably don't make the playoffs without him. So, we'd have probably choked against the Giants instead. **** JOSH BECKETT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 **** JOSH BECKETT! Cubs actually tagged Beckett and his faggy goatee for six earned runs in game one. After that, it wasn't good, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 You should still feel bad... Cubbies probably would of been in the World Series in 2003. THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT USE OF 'OF'... WHAT YOU MEAN TO SAY IS WOULD HAVE. "Cubbies probably would have been in the World Series in 2003. In what universe does 'of' mean what you use it for? This post was directed at the entirety of the JN population. You all do this, and it is never going to be any less wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrissey Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT USE OF 'OF'... WHAT YOU MEAN TO SAY IS WOULD HAVE. "Cubbies probably would have been in the World Series in 2003. In what universe does 'of' mean what you use it for? This post was directed at the entirety of the JN population. You all do this, and it is never going to be any less wrong. Piss off yah orange bastard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.