SouthernJet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Rick Mirer was Rookie of the Year too. Like I said earlier in the thread. I think we've already seen the best of Ryan. I don't think its going to ever get any better. He is good QB there is nothing wrong with that. He just ain't great and I don't think he ever will be. Now Flacco, on the other hand.... u put flacco in atl and ryan in balt and u r posting that flacco has peaked.. where they play has HUGE impact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 u put flacco in atl and ryan in balt and u r posting that flacco has peaked.. where they play has HUGE impact =100 Balt goes to SB with ryan and wins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 It would have been 40-10 Pats is the ticky tack call on the Pats isn't called too. Jesus, you guys are unreal. The Falcons defense stinks. This is why they will not be a viable threat. They will make the playoffs and then they will fail. There is way too much emphasis on QB play - I think half of you are ESPN sheep. Do you all think teh Jets success is because of Sanchez? It is not. It's because of your defense.....the kind of defense that is in Atlanta's dreams. we are 1-2 with KC at helm and we all know it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 we are 1-2 with KC at helm and we all know it agree,,KC gets sacked and we lose yardage in 90% of instances where Mex has taken that half step to avoid pass rush. He didnbt complete all the time, but we DIDNT lose yardage either.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 we are 1-2 with KC at helm and we all know it Agreed. You have a kick ass defense with a QB that will not lose games for you, shows great heart and leadership, and has a decent arm with football smarts. What I think is that Schotty's managing of Sanchez is nothing short of brilliant thus far. Play to the kids strengths, prop up his confidence, try not to put him in a position to fail. Still, it's the jets defense that drives the bus. C'mon now, boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Agreed. You have a kick ass defense with a QB that will not lose games for you, shows great heart and leadership, and has a decent arm with football smarts. What I think is that Schotty's managing of Sanchez is nothing short of brilliant thus far. Play to the kids strengths, prop up his confidence, try not to put him in a position to fail. Still, it's the jets defense that drives the bus. C'mon now, boys. i dont think anyone disagrees with that.. but if KC was in passenger seat we stink,,so it takes more than one element to win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 You cannot be ****ing serious comparing Ryan and Pennington's arm strength. This is just ****ing moronic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kleckineau Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 You cannot be ****ing serious comparing Ryan and Pennington's arm strength. This is just ****ing moronic. They are serious and they are ****ing moronic. Ryan has a top notch arm. Case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 They are serious and they are ****ing moronic. Ryan has a top notch arm. Case closed. rex ryan's arm is top notch, yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS17 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 You cannot be ****ing serious comparing Ryan and Pennington's arm strength. This is just ****ing moronic. They are serious and they are ****ing moronic. Ryan has a top notch arm. Case closed. +1 This tread/argument came out of left field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kleckineau Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 You cannot be ****ing serious comparing Ryan and Pennington's arm strength. This is just ****ing moronic. Matt Ryan has a so-so game and Kleck compares him to Chadwick. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Matt Ryan has a so-so game and Kleck compares him to Chadwick. Unbelievable. i am starting to think he lost major coin on that game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 i am starting to think he lost major coin on that game Nah. He is just bat**** crazy when it comes to certain players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 i am starting to think he lost major coin on that game Or he is just a bigtime Klondike...juicy fruit offer still holds ...do pat fans want him for 1 stick of gum...yes it can be ABC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Oh. Yeah, well, I guess there's that. I was mostly just pointing out that Klecko didn't seem to think there was anything wrong with Ryan a week ago. i knew it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 After what the Falcons did yesterday on a warm rainy day in Foxboro, you actually expect them to come into the Meadowlands in December and do anything? It sounds like the beer Natty Ice. And he supposedly has ice water in his veins, until he goes outside to play on a rainy 65 degree day. So on one hand Matt Ryan stinks cause he can't handle the cold, rain and snow and is only successful in a dome, (even though he played college ball in boston) and on the other hand, Sanchez is a ton more potential then Ryan, even though he's almost never played in the cold, rain and snow throughout his entire career and had numerous gaffe's in yesterday's rain.. how are these consistent positions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguini 15 Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 I don't see him as being like chad. 1. way stronger arm 2. he played very well in what was a very strong division last year before T.B. and Carolina dropped off. I just see him having a very successful career, although Sanchez will have a better one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 I think Sanchez is Pennington 2002 2.0, but Matt Ryan...maybe. They had similar traits before the shoulder thing for Chad. I don't think it's a knock to be compared to Pennington. At all really...I think he coulda/woulda/shoulda been a great QB, and sh*t happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 I think Sanchez is Pennington 2002 2.0, but Matt Ryan...maybe. They had similar traits before the shoulder thing for Chad. gfy! I don't think it's a knock to be compared to Pennington. At all really...I think he coulda/woulda/shoulda been a great QB, and sh*t happens. x2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 I think Sanchez is Pennington 2002 2.0, but Matt Ryan...maybe. They had similar traits before the shoulder thing for Chad. I don't think it's a knock to be compared to Pennington. At all really...I think he coulda/woulda/shoulda been a great QB, and sh*t happens. Idk about that. Sanchez is only 22 while Chad was 26 in 2002. Sanchez should be in college right now. Also Sanchez has thrown some passes already that Chad could never throw, ever. I thought Chad was a good QB - but I think Sanchez is better. There is a reason Sanchez was the nunmber one recruit coming out of high school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 From the way it looks right now Ryan, Flacco and Snachez are going to be the next trio of good QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Idk about that. Sanchez is only 22 while Chad was 26 in 2002. Sanchez should be in college right now. Also Sanchez has thrown some passes already that Chad could never throw, ever. I thought Chad was a good QB - but I think Sanchez is better. There is a reason Sanchez was the nunmber one recruit coming out of high school. Yea, but I'm talking more physically. Sanchez moves a bit more like Romo does, but similar everything else to pre-injury Pennington. Since Pennington is such a terrible name and all, I guess Sanchez to Romo makes more sense, though Sanchez is more clutch-y-ish. Personally, Pennington's a beast for coming back and being above average after the two major shoulder injuries. Nobody before him and ever come back from even one injury like that. The ruckus his name causes, like Mangini, is just insanely bitter and exaggerated. They're both locks to get 4-5 page threads with the same things being said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Yea, but I'm talking more physically. Sanchez moves a bit more like Romo does, but similar everything else to pre-injury Pennington. Since Pennington is such a terrible name and all, I guess Sanchez to Romo makes more sense, though Sanchez is more clutch-y-ish. Personally, Pennington's a beast for coming back and being above average after the two major shoulder injuries. Nobody before him and ever come back from even one injury like that. The ruckus his name causes, like Mangini, is just insanely bitter and exaggerated. They're both locks to get 4-5 page threads with the same things being said. I agree, and like I said, I liked Chad and agree that he is not given nearly enough credit for being a good QB. I liken Sanchez a lot to the guy we are playing this week - but Romo is similar to him as well. Sanchez is not a big "sit in the pocket and throw" QB. He needs his throwing lanes. But so do a lot of great QB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 The fact that Sanchez is where those guys were/are says alot. He's a special talent, but moreso he's been extremely, extremely well prepared for this NFL thing. He's very likely for big things if we don't dick around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Rick Mirer was Rookie of the Year too. Like I said earlier in the thread. I think we've already seen the best of Ryan. I don't think its going to ever get any better. He is good QB there is nothing wrong with that. He just ain't great and I don't think he ever will be. Now Flacco, on the other hand.... What has Ryan done to show that he's not going to get any better? He's doing good so far this year even with a lose to NE. He played in Boston so I really don't think the weather is going to be a problem for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Yea, but I'm talking more physically. Sanchez moves a bit more like Romo does, but similar everything else to pre-injury Pennington. Since Pennington is such a terrible name and all, I guess Sanchez to Romo makes more sense, though Sanchez is more clutch-y-ish. Personally, Pennington's a beast for coming back and being above average after the two major shoulder injuries. Nobody before him and ever come back from even one injury like that. The ruckus his name causes, like Mangini, is just insanely bitter and exaggerated. They're both locks to get 4-5 page threads with the same things being said. Its not exxagerrated and Sanchez is nothing like Pennington. Neither is Romo btw, you grossly over estimate Pennington as a QB. And there's really nothing clutch-y-ish about either Romo or Pennington.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.