124 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 As per ESPN today that he may be released in the next 10 days to clear the waivers, is the order of how a team can pick him up the draft order of the previous season? Therefore, the only 2 teams before us would be Houston & New Orleans, in which case we could pick him up. Am I right in that is how it goes or is it just a free for all as if he were a free agent in the offseason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quietjets Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 As per ESPN today that he may be released in the next 10 days to clear the waivers, is the order of how a team can pick him up the draft order of the previous season? Therefore, the only 2 teams before us would be Houston & New Orleans, in which case we could pick him up. Am I right in that is how it goes or is it just a free for all as if he were a free agent in the offseason? I am not sure but I think the waiver list is based on previous week. You know power rank... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Not sure how it works - but I sure hope we get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdhc Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 i don't really want someone who stomps on people's heads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harris5214 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 our defense can sure as hell use him , and give him 1 strike and if he ****s up or pulls any of that head stomping or kicking the chest **** i would give him the boot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyzmul Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I'd be less worried about Haynesworth stomping on peoples' head than I was about his injury history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 id' take him in a SECOND but i doubt he's the type of person that mangini wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBrady Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Mangini will in no way go for a guy with as questionable ethics as this guy, as good a player he may be, he is a cancer and Mangini would not bring a guy like that in to his team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 At this point it is based on this seasons record (waiver priority). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Mangini will in no way go for a guy with as questionable ethics as this guy, as good a player he may be, he is a cancer and Mangini would not bring a guy like that in to his team.you know being a bad guy and being a cancer don't have to come hand in hand... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Has he ever had any other incidents like this before? If this was the first time, then I'd hope Mangini gives him a look. They'd probably have to have a serious talk with him before though. And he would be on a short leash behavior-wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBrady Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Has he ever had any other incidents like this before? If this was the first time, then I'd hope Mangini gives him a look. They'd probably have to have a serious talk with him before though. And he would be on a short leash behavior-wise. No he has had other incidents, the guy is a hot head with an attitude problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarsFan Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Not sure how it works - but I sure hope we get him. Only a team as sorry as the Jets would be desperate enough to want this punk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Only a team as sorry as the Jets would be desperate enough to want this punk.If this idiot isn't gonna get banned then NO ONE EVER IS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 9, 2006 Author Share Posted October 9, 2006 Only a team as sorry as the Jets would be desperate enough to want this punk. Actually, plenty of teams would want a young 6'6, 330 pound lineman as long as the HC thought he could control his actions. Especially after anger management, he deserves another chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 This could be a turning point in his career. He could give us some great play if he comes out ready to make ammends by being a dominant force on the field legally. He's never been consistent in his career though, remember that. I'm not sure he's the answer to the 3-4 NT either. Again, we might be better off pairing him with Drob or Moore and playing 4-3. A Dline of Ellis - Haynesworth - Moore/Drob - Thomas Vilma would roam around like he did in his rookie year, maybe even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 9, 2006 Author Share Posted October 9, 2006 This could be a turning point in his career. He could give us some great play if he comes out ready to make ammends by being a dominant force on the field legally. He's never been consistent in his career though, remember that. I'm not sure he's the answer to the 3-4 NT either. Again, we might be better off pairing him with Drob or Moore and playing 4-3. A Dline of Ellis - Haynesworth - Moore/Drob - Thomas Vilma would roam around like he did in his rookie year, maybe even better. We're not going back to the 4-3, don't waste your fingers / breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I'd pick him up. Abso-f*ckin-lutely. Build an escape clause into his contract and sign him up. Make sure he doesn't get carried away like that again too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 you know being a bad guy and being a cancer don't have to come hand in hand... Well, PacMan likes him... I'm sure his contract has a escape clause in it already. Most of these contracts have a clause that they can escape for criminal behavior, etc., I'll bet the Titans go after him for some of his signing bonus based on that. This guy has had several other incidents in college and the pros. He's not going to be an instant savior at DT, but we have been getting pushed around. I'd give him a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i remember shea Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 now hold on...let's think this through...what if he head stomps robertson? would that actually justify bringing him in? this is actually a very tough call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer76 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 now hold on...let's think this through...what if he head stomps robertson? would that actually justify bringing him in? this is actually a very tough call. If he promised to head stomp Robertson I'd pay for the plane to pick him up myself. Robertson could use a few headstomps to knock some sense into him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham-City-Sparky Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 If all it cost us was cash I would take a chance on him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 At this point it is based on this seasons record (waiver priority). are you sure Max-I thought it still went from last season's record which would again put us behind Texans,Saints and Titans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.