Jetsfan80 Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 1. Brady (625 DYA, 57.4 % DVOA) 2. Rodgers (464, 54.1) 3. Brees (450, 37.9) 4. Fitzpatrick (447, 49.8) 5. Stafford (369, 35.5) 6. Hasselbeck (337, 35.0) 7. Romo (303, 33.6) 8. Schaub (304, 39.6) 9. Campbell (286, 40.2) 10. Newton (256, 22.7) 11. Rivers (250, 16.7) 12. Flacco (198, 15.1) 13. Sanchez (178, 11.6) 14. Grossman (175, 10.6) 15. Henne (150, 8.4) 16. Roethlisberger (131, 6.6) 17. Vick (130, 11.4) 18. Manning (124, 9.4) 19. Freeman (91, 1.5) 20. Ryan (88, -0.6) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Unfortuantely, that's going to disappoint a lot of people. You see Sanchez is supposed to suck big time and should not even be on a top 30 list! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 27, 2011 Author Share Posted September 27, 2011 Unfortuantely, that's going to disappoint a lot of people. You see Sanchez is supposed to suck big time and should not even be on a top 30 list! Funny, he's also way ahead of the guy people say they wanted in that draft, Josh Freeman, as well as 2010 # 1 pick Sam Bradford. Stafford is, of course, a beast, but we never had any reasonable chance of landing the # 1 pick in that draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Funny, he's also way ahead of the guy people say they wanted in that draft, Josh Freeman, as well as 2010 # 1 pick Sam Bradford. Stafford is, of course, a beast, but we never had any reasonable chance of landing the # 1 pick in that draft. Doesn't hurt to have Megatron to throw to, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 27, 2011 Author Share Posted September 27, 2011 Doesn't hurt to have Megatron to throw to, either. True. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Doesn't hurt to have Megatron to throw to, either. Even though some people question Sanchez's accuracy, if he had Megatron, his #'s would look 10x better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanFromQueens Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Sanchez also has an official NFL quarterback rating of 90.9, ranking 14th overall. Not bad for a 3rd year quarterback who only had 1 year of college experience starting with USC. This kid is still very raw in terms of overall experience, just the fact that he's been able to post a QB rating of 90.9, behind an awful offensive line thus far through 3 weeks is extremely impressive. His true test of year #3 comes against the Ravens in Baltimore this week. One thing is for sure, he's impressed, developed and improved in major ways this offseason/regular season, especially considering the fact that he's improved his accuracy despite the fact that he lost Braylon Edwards and Jerricho Cotchery during the offseason. Heading into the season, after two years, he had an average completion % of 54.3. He's up to a completion % of 63.1 as of right now. After two seasons, he also had an average QB rating of 69.15. He's up to 90.9 during his 3rd year. After two seasons, he's averaged 14.5 TD's per season. He's on pace for 32 TD's this year. After two seasons, he's averaged 2867.5 yards per year. As of right now, he's on pace for 4,725 yards. Anyone who "doesn't" or says they "haven't" seen MAJOR improvement out of Sanchez is either lying to 'prove a point' or refusing to admit that he's improved over night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloridaJetsFan Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 The receivers he has are more than adequate. I promise if you ask half the QBs in the Top 10, they'd be more than happy to throw to NYJ's receiver corps AND LT out of the backfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Unfortuantely, that's going to disappoint a lot of people. You see Sanchez is supposed to suck big time and should not even be on a top 30 list! So 13th is good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 So 13th is good? Potentially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 So 13th is good? Its not end of the world bad as it made out to be. And considering his play calling is done by Schotty..........sorry for the personal attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 The receivers he has are more than adequate. I promise if you ask half the QBs in the Top 10, they'd be more than happy to throw to NYJ's receiver corps AND LT out of the backfield. Every team has decent WR's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Potentially. You be quiet over there. Young Sanchez gets mocked until he's actually good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Its not end of the world bad as it made out to be. And considering his play calling is done by Schotty..........sorry for the personal attack. Yeah just world moves on mediocre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Every team has decent WR's. ESPECIALLY the ones with good QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Yeah just world moves on mediocre. When you have a horrible OC that does not making any in game adjustments and has predictable play calling, if the QB still ends up being middle of the pack that does say a lot of the QB's talent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 When you have a horrible OC that does not making any in game adjustments and has predictable play calling, if the QB still ends up being middle of the pack that does say a lot of the QB's talent! "Ok guys we're gonna run a screen" /walks up to line //recognizes zone coverage ///doesn't audible out of play because dictator OC would castrate him ////throws to LT for 3 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 The receivers he has are more than adequate. I promise if you ask half the QBs in the Top 10, they'd be more than happy to throw to NYJ's receiver corps AND LT out of the backfield. true, but ask them them about his current OL play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Funny, he's also way ahead of the guy people say they wanted in that draft, Josh Freeman, as well as 2010 # 1 pick Sam Bradford. Stafford is, of course, a beast, but we never had any reasonable chance of landing the # 1 pick in that draft. I wanted to pull a Ditka and trade the entire draft for Stafford. My love for Freeman is strictly based on what I've seen in the pro's. I had no opinion of him coming into the draft. Regarding Sanchez and his improvement, I started him in a fantasy league and he got me 31pts. Eat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 "Ok guys we're gonna run a screen" /walks up to line //recognizes zone coverage ///doesn't audible out of play because dictator OC would castrate him ////throws to LT for 3 yards. That's what good QBs do! Look at the game tape!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 I'll be impressed if he is higher than 13 next week after the Ravens game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 ESPECIALLY the ones with good QBs. Quite true, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 I'll be impressed if he is higher than 13 next week after the Ravens game. Last year through the first 3 games his rating was 104.9. Clearly, he is getting worse. lol I couldn't help myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Last year through the first 3 games his rating was 104.9. Clearly, he is getting worse. lol I couldn't help myself. Of course you can't BUT he has been better in every statistical category this year than last except INTs and QBR. His completion % is better, his yards per attempt better, and his total yards. He's the same in TDs. So he's better in (1) comp%, (2) YPA, (3) YDs Same in (1) TDs Worse in (1) QBR, and (2) INTs. So he's better in more categories than he's worse. See how it's easy to claim you're cherry picking and focusing solely on the negative? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Of course you can't BUT he has been better in every statistical category this year than last except INTs and QBR. His completion % is better, his yards per attempt better, and his total yards. He's the same in TDs. So he's better in (1) comp%, (2) YPA, (3) YDs Same in (1) TDs Worse in (1) QBR, and (2) INTs. So he's better in more categories than he's worse. See how it's easy to claim you're cherry picking and focusing solely on the negative? All categories are not equal. The ones you cherry-pick are less important than the ones I cherry-pick. Duh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloridaJetsFan Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Every team has decent WR's. NO – Lance Moore/Devery Henderson Ten – Nate Washington Buf – Stevie Johnson/David Nelson Oak – Heyward-Bey/Denarius Moore Yeah, I stand corrected ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 All categories are not equal. The ones you cherry-pick are less important than the ones I cherry-pick. Duh. Ahhh, got it. QBR & INTs are more important than completion %, YPA, and total yds. Got it. I'm going to hold you to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 "Ok guys we're gonna run a screen" /walks up to line //recognizes zone coverage ///doesn't audible out of play because dictator OC would castrate him ////throws to LT for 3 yards. That's what horrible OC's do, not make any adjustments. And it has boiled to a point where leaders on this team like Holmes are making it known to the media! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 I'll be impressed if he is higher than 13 next week after the Ravens game. FO is def adjusted... so even if he bombs, it won't kll him too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanFromQueens Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 All categories are not equal. The ones you cherry-pick are less important than the ones I cherry-pick. Duh. But against the Ravens last year, he only put up a QB rating of 56.4 going 10/21, 74 yards, completion % of 47.6% and 0 TD's/0 INT's. We lost that game because of Sanchez. We may have been 2-1 after 3 games last year, as we are after 3 games this year... But Sanchez has yet to "lose" us a game this season. He blew that game against the Ravens last year, but I'm willing to bet that he has a MUCH better performance this Sunday against that Ravens defense when compared to last year. Just more signs of Sanchez improving. After 3 games last year: 46/79, 550 yards, completion % of 57.0, 6.9 yards per pass attempt, 6 TD's/0 INT's. Keep in mind... Our offensive line and rushing attack were much better after 3 games last season when compared to this year thus far. It's actually been horrible this year, which makes the overall stats of Sanchez "that much more impressive". After 3 games this year: 70/111, 886 yards, completion % of 63.1, 7.9 yards per pass attempt, 6 TD's/4 INT's. It's obvious that Sanchez is a much better QB as of right now, when compared to last year. You can look at his 4 INT's and QB rating as a way to harp all over Sanchez all you like, but anyone who knows anything about Jets football will look at the facts that Sanchez has played behind an AWFUL offensive line this year, has had no rushing attack what so ever, three new WR's in Plaxico, Mason and Kerley and once again... An awful offensive line. Sanchez has improved. The offensive line hasn't. It's as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 That's what horrible OC's do, not make any adjustments. And it has boiled to a point where leaders on this team like Holmes are making it known to the media! Sanchez supposedly has all this freedom in the system. If he knew it was zone you're telling me they don't have plays to beat zone he could audible to? It's 50/50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Sanchez supposedly has all this freedom in the system. If he knew it was zone you're telling me they don't have plays to beat zone he could audible to? It's 50/50 I honestly think the problem is that Burress is a Trojan horse that isn't actually fooling anybody. The book is out on Sanchez. Everybody knows perfectly well that if his primary receiver is covered he's either going to check it down or double-clutch and chuck the ball right into traffic, so if we're ever going to get Holmes the ball we need a credible threat opposite him and it's pretty clear nobody is taking Burress all that seriously as such. Nobody is going to give Holmes a chance to kill them, so he's just gonna have to do like the rest of us and hope Keller can get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Sanchez supposedly has all this freedom in the system. If he knew it was zone you're telling me they don't have plays to beat zone he could audible to? It's 50/50 So you mean to say Holmes was also criticizing Sanchez ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 I honestly think the problem is that Burress is a Trojan horse that isn't actually fooling anybody. The book is out on Sanchez. Everybody knows perfectly well that if his primary receiver is covered he's either going to check it down or double-clutch and chuck the ball right into traffic, so if we're ever going to get Holmes the ball we need a credible threat opposite him and it's pretty clear nobody is taking Burress all that seriously as such. Nobody is going to give Holmes a chance to kill them, so he's just gonna have to do like the rest of us and hope Keller can get it done. Agreed, and Mason isn't scaring anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 So you mean to say Holmes was also criticizing Sanchez ? I mean to say the QB has the freedom to call audibles. It has nothing to do with holmes comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.