Azuma Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 I've read many are not thrilled with Josh McCown starting this coming year. But I reason Mac had to have a vet quarterback to mentor the two kids. With a rebuild in place, I wonder what Mac/Bowles plan is regarding the QB position. Do they fill the tank with McCown and let the team sink? My guess is they start Josh for first 6 games, go 1-5. Then they bring in Petty for the next 4 or 5 and finish it off with Hack for the final quarter. Any way you spin it, this team ain't winning more than 3 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 That of course would be the dumbest possible scenario so you are likely right. Only one answer. Choose between Hack and Petty, give him all the reps. and 16 games. Anything else is just spinning our wheels and once again not answering the questions at QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 Petty or Hackenberg or bust you do not start a 38 year old QB 18-42 NFL career on a young rebuilding team. No way in hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 42 minutes ago, Azuma said: I've read many are not thrilled with Josh McCown starting this coming year. But I reason Mac had to have a vet quarterback to mentor the two kids. With a rebuild in place, I wonder what Mac/Bowles plan is regarding the QB position. Do they fill the tank with McCown and let the team sink? My guess is they start Josh for first 6 games, go 1-5. Then they bring in Petty for the next 4 or 5 and finish it off with Hack for the final quarter. Any way you spin it, this team ain't winning more than 3 games. unless petty and hack really lay some eggs in training camp and do not get the respect of the rest of the team, one of them should start. this season should be all about developing a qb for future success and if petty/hack have the physical and leadership ability mccown should be planted on the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuma Posted June 14, 2017 Author Share Posted June 14, 2017 16 minutes ago, johnnysd said: That of course would be the dumbest possible scenario so you are likely right. Only one answer. Choose between Hack and Petty, give him all the reps. and 16 games. Anything else is just spinning our wheels and once again not answering the questions at QB. You're dealing with a GM that drafted a midget, took 2 wr's at a position where we had ample potential, drafted safties back to back, overpaid for Fitz and overpaid for McCown who nobody was willing to give more than 2 million. Stupid is as stupid does. So the question is why did Mac give McCown 6 million? To sit on the bench and draw diagrams on a clipboard for Hack and Petty? My guess is he plans to tank and tank hard while trying to give the impression he's trying to win. Other than that it makes no sense whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASH1962 Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 13 minutes ago, Azuma said: You're dealing with a GM that drafted a midget, took 2 wr's at a position where we had ample potential, drafted safties back to back, overpaid for Fitz and overpaid for McCown who nobody was willing to give more than 2 million. Stupid is as stupid does. So the question is why did Mac give McCown 6 million? To sit on the bench and draw diagrams on a clipboard for Hack and Petty? My guess is he plans to tank and tank hard while trying to give the impression he's trying to win. Other than that it makes no sense whatsoever. Love the Bubba Gump reference LOL...Look we have a HC that will be coaching (and I use this term VERY loosely) for his job, he is not going to start a young, inexperienced QB. So let's all accept the fact that McCown will be under center in week #1, and that's not my fault or any other posters fault here, it is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuma Posted June 14, 2017 Author Share Posted June 14, 2017 5 minutes ago, ASH1962 said: Love the Bubba Gump reference LOL...Look we have a HC that will be coaching (and I use this term VERY loosely) for his job, he is not going to start a young, inexperienced QB. So let's all accept the fact that McCown will be under center in week #1, and that's not my fault or any other posters fault here, it is what it is. You never know what you're gonna find in a box of chocolates. Getting back to the OP, what's your QB rotation this year because by golly there will be one and all 3 of these qb's will play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 2 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Petty or Hackenberg or bust you do not start a 38 year old QB 18-42 NFL career on a young rebuilding team. No way in hell. Joewilly12, the voice of reason! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 14 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Petty or Hackenberg or bust you do not start a 38 year old QB 18-42 NFL career on a young rebuilding team. No way in hell. This isnt socialism. Bowles can't give Petty or Hack the starting job if they aren't even close to a career JAG like McCown in performance in practice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 13 hours ago, Azuma said: You never know what you're gonna find in a box of chocolates. Getting back to the OP, what's your QB rotation this year because by golly there will be one and all 3 of these qb's will play. It's going to be McClown until he gets benched or injured then Hack then Petty. Sprinkle in some Jay Cutler I can see Macagnan getting desperate and trying to sign him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicg4360 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Love the Bubba Gump reference LOL...Look we have a HC that will be coaching (and I use this term VERY loosely) for his job, he is not going to start a young, inexperienced QB. So let's all accept the fact that McCown will be under center in week #1, and that's not my fault or any other posters fault here, it is what it is. Regardless how good McCown looks Bowles needs someone to drill in his head the cold hard facts he has won 2 games in the past 3 seasons yet has 20 losses....and it's not like he's a fine wine and getting better with age. The roster he will be playing with will have similar talent level to that of when he was on the Browns and I think he won 1 game in 2 seasons with them. There is no such thing as he gives us the best chance to win...zero. he could look like Montana in training camp but facts are facts ...he has no business being on the field no matter how much "experience" he has. Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuma Posted June 15, 2017 Author Share Posted June 15, 2017 14 minutes ago, nicg4360 said: Regardless how good McCown looks Bowles needs someone to drill in his head the cold hard facts he has won 2 games in the past 3 seasons yet has 20 losses....and it's not like he's a fine wine and getting better with age. The roster he will be playing with will have similar talent level to that of when he was on the Browns and I think he won 1 game in 2 seasons with them. There is no such thing as he gives us the best chance to win...zero. he could look like Montana in training camp but facts are facts ...he has no business being on the field no matter how much "experience" he has. Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app It's the secret SFS plan. Mac has no intention on winning more than 2 games. As you said, McCown has won 1 or 2 games in the 2 years with Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicg4360 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 It's the secret SFS plan. Mac has no intention on winning more than 2 games. As you said, McCown has won 1 or 2 games in the 2 years with Browns. True ....I would not be suprised. Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 23 minutes ago, Azuma said: It's the secret SFS plan. Mac has no intention on winning more than 2 games. As you said, McCown has won 1 or 2 games in the 2 years with Browns. And Petty has won 1 and Hack 0 If we were really trying to tank we wouldn't have signed McCown and we wouldn't be talking Steve Smith out of retirement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 41 minutes ago, nicg4360 said: Regardless how good McCown looks Bowles needs someone to drill in his head the cold hard facts he has won 2 games in the past 3 seasons yet has 20 losses....and it's not like he's a fine wine and getting better with age. The roster he will be playing with will have similar talent level to that of when he was on the Browns and I think he won 1 game in 2 seasons with them. There is no such thing as he gives us the best chance to win...zero. he could look like Montana in training camp but facts are facts ...he has no business being on the field no matter how much "experience" he has. Sent from my Moto Z using JetNation.com mobile app And Fitz had a similarly bad win/loss record prior to 2015 - that's what Mac and Bowles are banking on is McCown having a season like what Fitz did 2 years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuma Posted June 15, 2017 Author Share Posted June 15, 2017 32 minutes ago, thadude said: And Petty has won 1 and Hack 0 If we were really trying to tank we wouldn't have signed McCown and we wouldn't be talking Steve Smith out of retirement McCown, imo, is nothing more than a save your face addition. A vet QB which every team has at least one of. He probably sticks around a couple more years after Mac takes his QB in 2018. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 It is June 15. Again, June 15. This team, as it should, will allow mini camp to expire, review tape and discuss internally, allow training camp to happen, review tape and discuss internally, and then create a plan for pre-season games. Then they will probably, after 2 games pre-season, finalize their plan for the start of the season. That is when this will happen. Not June 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: It is June 15. Again, June 15. This team, as it should, will allow mini camp to expire, review tape and discuss internally, allow training camp to happen, review tape and discuss internally, and then create a plan for pre-season games. Then they will probably, after 2 games pre-season, finalize their plan for the start of the season. That is when this will happen. Not June 15. How can you be so sure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, Sperm Edwards said: How can you be so sure? Because, that is how reasonable and prudent managers and executives handle things. Especially in sport, where there are so many uncertainties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, Scott Dierking said: Because, that is how reasonable and prudent managers and executives handle things. Especially in sport, where there are so many uncertainties. It was a joke. Lighten up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 minute ago, Sperm Edwards said: It was a joke. Lighten up. Stop picking on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 12 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: Because, that is how reasonable and prudent managers and executives handle things. Especially in sport, where there are so many uncertainties. Did you just use "reasonable and prudent managers and executives" in reference to the current Jets hierarchy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxAF Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 I've said it before and I'll say it again. No coach, GM, or player sets their sights on tanking or losing. They may lose alot this year but the Jets are freeing up money and gearing up to spend in 2018. Bowles will put the best players on the field every week to try and win games. Does that mean McCown? I hope not, but maybe. The early part of the schedule is light so Bowles may go with McCown to nail down some early wins. Probably all depends on camp and preseason game play. There's a lot of young players on the team that will want to nail down starting positions, make a mark in the NFL and get big contracts. The team is not set out to tank. No such thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuma Posted June 15, 2017 Author Share Posted June 15, 2017 42 minutes ago, MaxAF said: I've said it before and I'll say it again. No coach, GM, or player sets their sights on tanking or losing. They may lose alot this year but the Jets are freeing up money and gearing up to spend in 2018. Bowles will put the best players on the field every week to try and win games. Does that mean McCown? I hope not, but maybe. The early part of the schedule is light so Bowles may go with McCown to nail down some early wins. Probably all depends on camp and preseason game play. There's a lot of young players on the team that will want to nail down starting positions, make a mark in the NFL and get big contracts. The team is not set out to tank. No such thing. Gloria Clemente: [to Billy] Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose. Winning or losing is all one organic mechanism, from which one extracts what one needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxAF Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 6 minutes ago, Azuma said: Gloria Clemente: [to Billy] Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose. Winning or losing is all one organic mechanism, from which one extracts what one needs. Quite Profound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuma Posted June 15, 2017 Author Share Posted June 15, 2017 9 minutes ago, MaxAF said: Quite Profound I knew you had a high IQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 18 hours ago, Azuma said: I've read many are not thrilled with Josh McCown starting this coming year. But I reason Mac had to have a vet quarterback to mentor the two kids. With a rebuild in place, I wonder what Mac/Bowles plan is regarding the QB position. Do they fill the tank with McCown and let the team sink? My guess is they start Josh for first 6 games, go 1-5. Then they bring in Petty for the next 4 or 5 and finish it off with Hack for the final quarter. Any way you spin it, this team ain't winning more than 3 games. If Hack only plays the final quarter of the games then we basically know he stinks before he even gets on the field. If they go to Petty over him that's a terrible sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 49 minutes ago, Azuma said: Gloria Clemente: [to Billy] Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose. Winning or losing is all one organic mechanism, from which one extracts what one needs. We chose to mostly lose! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.