Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Neither guy belongs in the nfl. That’s not hyperbole they are both terrible. The only way Macagnan can make it look like he is serious about upgrading at qb is by finally getting rid of these two clown ms and wiping the slate totally clean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RESNewYork Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Both are under contract. Shouldn' there be a replacement before cutting them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Hopefully after we have replacements on the roster Macc needs to get with the rest of the NFL and have 2 QBs on the roster and 1 on the PS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, RESNewYork said: Both are under contract. Shouldn' there be a replacement before cutting them? Shouldn’t that not be difficult to find? I can fly to Canada and find two CFL qbs who are as good or better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 I'd guess the QB depth chart in 2018 will be: 1. Rookie 2. McCown 3. Hack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, Larz said: Hopefully after we have replacements on the roster Macc needs to get with the rest of the NFL and have 2 QBs on the roster and 1 on the PS Wait, not 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, Mike135 said: I'd guess the QB depth chart in 2018 will be: 1. Rookie 2. McCown 3. Hack Why are we still bothering with Hack? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn31 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, Philc1 said: Why are we still bothering with Hack? Why? In the game thread there's people who still declare faith in Hack. Makes me realize a lot of "fans" just don't understand football & athletics in general. And probably the Jets' idiot GM as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, Philc1 said: Why are we still bothering with Hack? Why? I think they like the guy. 2 years invested. Why waste it? I'd imagine they still see Hack as a potential starter. Let's say in 2018, the rookie gets hurt for a game or two. In that case play Mccown (or other random vet). But if the rookie QB gets seriously injured, play Hack in hopes he takes over. He's the young project with tons of potential. No need for a 3rd string mediocre backup. 1. Starting potential franchise guy 2. Vet backup to help youngin's and be ready when needed 3. Potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Hack -- Never Petty -- After the 2018 4th pre-season game when he just beats out Josh Allen for the #3 spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, glenn31 said: In the game thread there's people who still declare faith in Hack. Makes me realize a lot of "fans" just don't understand football & athletics in general. And probably the Jets' idiot GM as well. Hack doesn’t belong on an nfl roster. This is not even a debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, Spoot-Face said: Hack -- Never Petty -- After the 2018 4th pre-season game when he just beats out Josh Allen for the #3 spot. Lolz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, Mike135 said: I think they like the guy. 2 years invested. Why waste it? I'd imagine they still see Hack as a potential starter. Let's say in 2018, the rookie gets hurt for a game or two. In that case play Mccown (or other random vet). But if the rookie QB gets seriously injured, play Hack in hopes he takes over. He's the young project with tons of potential. No need for a 3rd string mediocre backup. 1. Starting potential franchise guy 2. Vet backup to help youngin's and be ready when needed 3. Potential With that logic Kyle Wilson should still be our nickel corner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, Philc1 said: With that logic Kyle Wilson should still be our nickel corner Except that no one who thinks with any logic would ever equate QB to CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 18 minutes ago, RESNewYork said: Both are under contract. Shouldn' there be a replacement before cutting them? Normally I'd say yes but you could replace Hackenberg with me at this point and the results are the same. We're both so sh*tty we couldn't get in for a single series on a day like today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, SayNoToDMC said: Normally I'd say yes but you could replace Hackenberg with me at this point and the results are the same. We're both so sh*tty we couldn't get in for a single series on a day like today lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southtown24th Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 NOW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 By the way, Bryce Petty is HORRIBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 hour ago, RESNewYork said: Both are under contract. Shouldn' there be a replacement before cutting them? Sometimes you don't need to know who the replacement will be. Knowing there is someone out there that cannot suck more is reason enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 Hack still has his yellow shirt season left. He’s good. Petty is in danger though when they resign Joshy and draft Luke Falk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted January 1, 2018 Author Share Posted January 1, 2018 6 hours ago, JiF said: Hack still has his yellow shirt season left. He’s good. Petty is in danger though when they resign Joshy and draft Luke Falk. Can they carry 5 qbs next season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 9 hours ago, Philc1 said: Hack doesn’t belong on an nfl roster. This is not even a debate Thanks for letting us know what is allowed to be debated lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted January 1, 2018 Author Share Posted January 1, 2018 Just now, Maxman said: Thanks for letting us know what is allowed to be debated lol. Figure of speech. I just can’t see how anyone can still make the argument “well we still haven’t seen Hack play yet” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 1 minute ago, Philc1 said: Figure of speech. I just can’t see how anyone can still make the argument “well we still haven’t seen Hack play yet” I don't think Hack belongs on an NFL roster at this point. If he couldn't beat out Petty, it is tough to say he has potential. I think Bowles did Macc a favor but not playing Hack. Exposing both Petty and Hack this year would make Macc look even worse. But I still respect people's rights to debate stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.