CTM Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Also, scum wouldn't want their partner to get lynched, because they'd die too. We'd learn something about the respective behaviors if we know who is paired up with who. thats true for everyone though.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Why would the cop get outed? We'd only be revealing who our lovers are, not roles. It would box in scum, because they'd have to reveal which townie they're paired up with, and everyone in the game could work towards not only scum-hunting in the game thread, but also providing info in the "lover chats". Suspicious behavior, etc. Isn't more info better for town? Cop outed through normal game play. I don't understand how you are boxing them in, example? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 21 hours ago, Nynaeve said: You know what they say about fishing? That it's boring. The only people that say this are the people that don't know how to catch fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 13 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Anyone up for a mass claim of lovers? @Nolder would this be allowed? Can't see any downside to it if it's allowed. Scum already knows who their side is matched up with lover-wise. No. 11 hours ago, Nynaeve said: And im debating if 80 should hang just for throwing the suggestion in the first place. Agreed. I don't like the suggestion at all, and I know exactly why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 10 minutes ago, JiF said: The only people that say this are the people that don't know how to catch fish. Bad day fishing > Revis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 13 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: I have no right to argue this, but I'd say Danica is a HUGE step down from Olivia Munn. Be that as it may, Danica is still a HUGE step up from most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 So 80 is using poor logic and confused as to why and Nyn overreacted with passion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, The Crusher said: Bad day fishing > Revis Bad day of fishing with diarrhea and herpes breakout > Revis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 4 hours ago, CTM said: Not a great idea, Nyn's over reaction was more noteworthy.. you are just being dumb as usual Wouldn't necessarily call it an overreaction. Don't like this subtle defense of a 80. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 hours ago, AVM said: What precludes two scum from being lovers? Or having some sort of death mitigation PR? That would be silly. They're already scum. No need to have a lover at all in that case. The latter part is certainly possible, but right now we're in the dark. Hence why I'm attempting to level the scales as far as information goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 I mean, if there's a super obvious reason this is dumb but also shouldn't be discussed, fine, I'll shut up about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Spoot and Nyn's reactions seemed townie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Also, scum wouldn't want their partner to get lynched, because they'd die too. We'd learn something about the respective behaviors if we know who is paired up with who. I still don't agree with your plan, but this brings up a really good point. Any townies that are paired with scum will be the last townies to die, so we need to pay attention to anyone who looks super-townie, but is still alive as the game progresses, because they may still be alive for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Jetsfan80 said: That would be silly. They're already scum. No need to have a lover at all in that case. The latter part is certainly possible, but right now we're in the dark. Hence why I'm attempting to level the scales as far as information goes. Why not let the game play out before laying all the cards on the table? IDK maybe there are mechanics in the game that level the scales that the scum doesn't know about. Maybe there is a way that revealing the lovers could potentially be counterproductive and actually tilt the scale more heavily in scums favor? This seems unnecessary at this stage nd it's one thing to just start some conversation and get some action, which worked. It's another to double down and act like there is no down side to the idea. It's kind of like the Jets drafted another S at #6 in this years draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Spoot-Face said: I still don't agree with your plan, but this brings up a really good point. Any townies that are paired with scum will be the last townies to die, so we need to pay attention to anyone who looks super-townie, but is still alive as the game progresses, because they may still be alive for a reason. Scum who are paired with townies will likely be active and helpful in the QT's too. A townie would generally be more than willing to die if it meant their scum lover died too in a 1:1 transaction. So scum will need to be careful in their QT's and not raise suspicion. In essence, there's incentive to make good use of your QT. If you're both townies, you're mason partners whose survival depends on each other. If it's scum/town, town needs to scumhunt their lover, while the scum player needs to participate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 9 minutes ago, Spoot-Face said: Wouldn't necessarily call it an overreaction. Don't like this subtle defense of a 80. Can were start abbreviating him as "a 80" from now on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Jetsfan80 said: Scum who are paired with townies will likely be active and helpful in the QT's too. A townie would generally be more than willing to die if it meant their scum lover died too in a 1:1 transaction. So scum will need to be careful in their QT's and not raise suspicion. In essence, there's incentive to make good use of your QT. If you're both townies, you're mason partners whose survival depends on each other. If it's scum/town, town needs to scumhunt their lover, while the scum player needs to participate. Yeah, as it stands now, it's actually a bit harder for scum to hide than normal, both in the game thread and in their Lover QT. But we should not reveal our lovers unless you believe that your lover is Scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, JiF said: Why not let the game play out before laying all the cards on the table? IDK maybe there are mechanics in the game that level the scales that the scum doesn't know about. Maybe there is a way that revealing the lovers could potentially be counterproductive and actually tilt the scale more heavily in scums favor? This seems unnecessary at this stage nd it's one thing to just start some conversation and get some action, which worked. It's another to double down and act like there is no down side to the idea. It's kind of like the Jets drafted another S at #6 in this years draft. I get it. Consider the subject dropped. I'm gonna make use of my QT and start working with my lover. Even if he/she is friend-zoning me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, JiF said: Can were start abbreviating him as "a 80" from now on? Yeah, weird typo, that. But it stays as I don't edit my posts during Mafia play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Jetsfan80 said: I get it. Consider the subject dropped. I'm gonna make use of my QT and start working with my lover. Even if he/she is friend-zoning me. Was it my S @ #6 reference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Just now, JiF said: Was it my S @ #6 reference? Read up, I'd already decided to do that before your post. But I did like the Safety reference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Jetsfan80 said: I get it. Consider the subject dropped. I'm gonna make use of my QT and start working with my lover. Even if he/she is friend-zoning me. Wait, I thought @Verbal wasn't playing?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Spoot-Face said: Wait, I thought @Verbal wasn't playing?? If Verbal were my lover, I'd have stolen a gun and committed murder/suicide already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 18 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: If Verbal were my lover, I'd have stolen a gun and committed murder/suicide already. Actually with game mechanics you would get a day or three or so to enjoy killing him before you died. Pretty fucking nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Spoot-Face said: Be that as it may, Danica is still a HUGE step up from most. He's an NFL QB, he has stalkers that would be a HUGE step up from most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 6 hours ago, The Crusher said: How? It's simple. There's absolutely no reason whatsover to let them know who dies along with who. Furthermore they are liable to avoid shooting someone who's lover died cause they know they're basically dead...and I don't know about you but im not in the business of giving scum freebees. Are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 5 hours ago, CTM said: Not a great idea, Nyn's over reaction was more noteworthy.. you are just being dumb as usual How is it an overreaction? It's ******* stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Jetsfan80 said: That would be silly. They're already scum. No need to have a lover at all in that case. What? For all we know, Nolder went random.org... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Lizard King said: What? For all we know, Nolder went random.org... Scum already has a QT. Why would 2 scums share an additional QT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 hour ago, JiF said: Why not let the game play out before laying all the cards on the table? IDK maybe there are mechanics in the game that level the scales that the scum doesn't know about. Maybe there is a way that revealing the lovers could potentially be counterproductive and actually tilt the scale more heavily in scums favor? This seems unnecessary at this stage nd it's one thing to just start some conversation and get some action, which worked. It's another to double down and act like there is no down side to the idea. It's kind of like the Jets drafted another S at #6 in this years draft. I like this post. I couldn’t figure out why I hated this discussion but this post sums it up nicely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Just now, Jetsfan80 said: Scum already has a QT. Why would 2 scums share an additional QT? Are you joking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Lizard King said: Are you joking? I'm not. Why would there need to be a QT within a QT? Makes no sense. Only reason that would be the case is if Scum has a Traitor role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: Scum already has a QT. Why would 2 scums share an additional QT? You're abusing cluelessness atp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Dice why so quiet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Nynaeve said: You'r abusing cluelessness atp Posts like these aren't helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.