The Crusher Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 5 minutes ago, jgb said: Holdouts allowed also, with pre-negotiated financial penalties for doing it. The CBA does not prohibit withholding services for a very good reason — it would violate the United States Constitution. To be free, a man must be the ultimate master of his own sweat. An entire war was fought over it and everything. I sweat and feel free when I eat 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Just now, jgb said: And even if we took Hughes at face value, people do sometimes change their minds. There’s no reason to take Hughes at face value here. Reddick’s been agitating for a new deal since January, but then arbitrarily drops that demand to come to the Jets? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Just now, T0mShane said: There’s no reason to take Hughes at face value here. Reddick’s been agitating for a new deal since January, but then arbitrarily drops that demand to come to the Jets? I am just kicking out the only leg of the one-legged stool upon which our dear debate partners rest. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, The Crusher said: I sweat and feel free when I eat The meat sweats are real?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, The Crusher said: I sweat and feel free when I eat How about other bodily functions? Reddick wants to know. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, Dcat said: How about other bodily functions? Reddick wants to know. Crusher is the kind of guy who eats on the toilet. He multi-tasks input and output. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 3 minutes ago, T0mShane said: There’s no reason to take Hughes at face value here. Reddick’s been agitating for a new deal since January, but then arbitrarily drops that demand to come to the Jets? No one is saying (at least logical people) " that he "dropped his demand for a new contract". What is being said is that the Jets would entertain negotiating a new contract, BUT it has to come with the condition of being in camp. One foot in front of the other. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 minutes ago, jgb said: I am just kicking out the only leg of the one-legged stool upon which our dear debate partners rest. Only the Jets can turn a relatively standard contract standoff into a months-long quagmire and only Jets fans would throw their bodies in front of any criticism that this voraciously dysfunctional management group might incur as a result. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 23 minutes ago, kmnj said: The lie is he said the jets would not give up on Becton , he said Adams will be a jet for life He didn’t say Becton could suck ass and would never be released. Find a quote that said he would always have a job. Then find the quote where he promised Adams would be a Jet for life no matter how unreasonable his pay requirements were. That Adams wanting to be paid at the pay scale of a position he didn’t play was acceptable and JD had to agree because he wanted to negotiate an equitable deal keeping Adams a Jet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Only the Jets can turn a relatively standard contract standoff into a months-long quagmire and only Jets fans would throw their bodies in front of any criticism that this voraciously dysfunctional management group might incur as a result. “But lying is wrong ipso facto Joe is a sweet innocent, blameless and pure.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, Jet Nut said: He didn’t say Becton could suck ass and would never be released. Find a quote that said he would always have a job. Then find the quote where he promised Adams would be a Jet for life no matter how unreasonable his pay requirements were. That Adams wanting to be paid at the pay scale of a position he didn’t play was acceptable and JD had to agree because he wanted to negotiate an equitable deal keeping Adams a Jet The whole point is quotes don’t matter. We have all heard the term “coach speak.” You keep demonstrating your misplaced faith in something everyone knows is in large part a bunch of bromidic malarkey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 20 minutes ago, T0mShane said: If Hasson Reddick was—to quote Hughes here—“willing to play on his current deal and dominate”—he’d still be in Philly. This is Hughes doing clean up for his golf buddies at Florham Park. Awesome how you magically jumped to that conclusion. 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 20 minutes ago, jgb said: Yes. That is proof. It’s the same reason things in the store have price tags. Otherwise the CBA would say “a player may not withhold services,” which would, of course be unconstitutional. It’s absolutely not proof. From your definition of a fine or any other sense of the word. You’re twisting the definition of a fine to make your argument. Price tags on retail items, another analogy that has nothing to do with this scenario. He’s under contract. A contract he freely signed. Which requires him being in camp. To get prepared for a season that he’ll be paid to perform in. He accepted the money, the signing bonus in trade for the requirements of the contract. The CBA does say he “may not withhold services” by allowing ownership to set in place fines for withholding of services. I guess you’re saying players also don’t actually have to play in games even though they’ve been paid. I’d love to know which sport pays players who have the option of working a schedule theyre comfortable with and not one mandated 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Just now, Jet Nut said: It’s absolutely not proof. From your definition of a fine or any other sense of the word. You’re twisting the definition of a fine to make your argument. Price tags on retail items, another analogy that has nothing to do with this scenario. He’s under contract. A contract he freely signed. Which requires him being in camp. To get prepared for a season that he’ll be paid to perform in. He accepted the money, the signing bonus in trade for the requirements of the contract. The CBA does say he “may not withhold services” by allowing ownership to set in place fines for withholding of services. I guess you’re saying players also don’t actually have to play in games even though they’ve been paid. I’d love to know which sport pays players who have the option of working a schedule theyre comfortable with and not one mandated Dios mio. Have a good afternoon man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 7 minutes ago, jgb said: The whole point is quotes don’t matter. We have all heard the term “coach speak.” You keep demonstrating your misplaced faith in something everyone knows is in large part a bunch of bromidic malarkey. Except contracts aren’t a large part a bunch of malarkey. That’s why they have terms that are agreed upon and are enforceable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 15 minutes ago, jgb said: The whole point is quotes don’t matter. We have all heard the term “coach speak.” You keep demonstrating your misplaced faith in something everyone knows is in large part a bunch of bromidic malarkey. The whole point is, we are going by what's being reported, not just jumping to conclusions that support your tainted, biased opinion. We are at least presenting some type of evidence, to support our point of view. You just keep spewing your same ridiculous nonsense - with nothing at all to back it up - not an article, not a report, not a video. Give it a rest bud, your opinion - with no facts, reports or video to back it up, means absolutely d!ck, It might mean something to you & your grossly, self-inflated ego - but that's about where it ends. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Just now, ARodJetsFan said: The whole point is, we are going by what's being reported, not just jumping to conclusions that support your tainted biased opinion, We are at least presenting some type of evidence to support our point of view. You just keep spewing your same ridiculous nonsense - with nothing at all to back it up - not an article, not a report, not a video' Give it a rest bud, your opinion - with no facts, reports or video to back it up, means absolutely d!ck, Apparently I misunderstand the purpose of a discussion board lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 3 minutes ago, jgb said: Apparently I misunderstand the purpose of a discussion board lol. You misunderstand A WHOLE LOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, ARodJetsFan said: You misunderstand A WHOLE LOT. The first step toward knowledge is admitting what you don’t know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, jgb said: The first step toward knowledge is admitting what you don’t know. Maybe you'll get there one day, but I'm not holding my breath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 minutes ago, ARodJetsFan said: Maybe you'll get there one day, but I'm not holding my breath. If anything you probably need to breathe a little more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Personally I'd rather see us prioritize a new contract for MC2 instead of placating a 1 year rental. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 29 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Only the Jets can turn a relatively standard contract standoff into a months-long quagmire and only Jets fans would throw their bodies in front of any criticism that this voraciously dysfunctional management group might incur as a result. Just so you understand my tact here-Both Douglas and the Reddick camp have screwed this up. Together. What we have is a failure to communicate. No one is blameless. But, time is on the Jets side here (as we sit here today). That may change in a couple of weeks if he is that dug in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, JohnnyLV said: Personally I'd rather see us prioritize a new contract for MC2 instead of placating a 1 year rental. Agreed, MC2 should be an extension priority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 7 minutes ago, jgb said: If anything you probably need to breathe a little more No need for you to worry. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 5 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: Just so you understand my tact here-Both Douglas and the Reddick camp have screwed this up. Together. What we have is a failure to communicate. No one is blameless. But, time is on the Jets side here (as we sit here today). That may change in a couple of weeks if he is that dug in. I agree with all that and definitely wasn’t including you in that formulation. Big picture, this is a low-leverage, who-cares situation that won’t matter in a few weeks. My beguilement comes from the fact that this was the type of readily predictable and easily avoidable error that the Woody Johnson Jets constantly stumble into for no reason. And if the resolution turns out to be throwing Reddick another $5 mil in cash to make him whole, they could have just done that a month ago. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 73 pages? Nuts! Who cares about this guy? He may be a good player and a cool fella, but he has never played a down for the Jets. If he shows up, cool. Another piece for an already great D. If not, cool, and Jets save $/cap. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreened Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 15 minutes ago, ARodJetsFan said: You misunderstand A WHOLE LOT. Meanwhile, he’s dragging you through the mud for all of us to see 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 1 minute ago, GangGreened said: Meanwhile, he’s dragging you through the mud for all of us to see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 minutes ago, GangGreened said: Meanwhile, he’s dragging you through the mud for all of us to see Meh, I think not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 I find that I don't really give a crap about Reddick. Completely detached from the team, never played a snap, was a surprise trade when it happened, and think the Defense is good enough without him. At this point, I have no idea what kind of condition/shape he's in even IF he reports at some point. It's a stupid situation all around. This team threw gave Franklin-Myers a four-year contract extension for $55 million with $30.2 million guaranteed in 2021 for an UDFA guy... but want Reddick to play for his old Eagles contract, meanwhile Reddick is losing a Million bucks and hiding in Japan or something after saying the contract doesn't matter, he's here to play Football. It's just stupidity and I just can't make myself care about it. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 14 minutes ago, T0mShane said: I agree with all that and definitely wasn’t including you in that formulation. Big picture, this is a low-leverage, who-cares situation that won’t matter in a few weeks. My beguilement comes from the fact that this was the type of readily predictable and easily avoidable error that the Woody Johnson Jets constantly stumble into for no reason. And if the resolution turns out to be throwing Reddick another $5 mil in cash to make him whole, they could have just done that a month ago. The one fact, that is really bogging down the whole situation is Reddick's refusal to report. Had he of shown up to OTA's & mandatory minicamp, I'd wager this (his contract situation) would have been resolved months ago. Sure, I understand the argument that there is plenty of blame to go around, and there is some truth to that, but Reddick is definitely not helping himself - or the team for that matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 33 minutes ago, ARodJetsFan said: Awesome how you magically jumped to that conclusion. 🙄 Just to be clear here—Reddick was willing to play on his existing contract, but the Eagles instead opted to 1. Eat $22 mil in dead cap AND 2. Give Bryce Huff $50 mil to replace him? How does that make any sense? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 The only thing that makes any sense from the Reddick camp at this point is that he's hoping to gain leverage during the preseason due to injury or other. Micheal Clemons penciled in as a starter may just be "other". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARodJetsFan Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 11 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Just to be clear here—Reddick was willing to play on his existing contract, but the Eagles instead opted to 1. Eat $22 mil in dead cap AND 2. Give Bryce Huff $50 mil to replace him? How does that make any sense? There is really no way to be clear about this situation, it's an absolute sh!t-show. Howie Roseman is probably the only one who can answer that question. I read an article yesterday, that the Eagles had Bryce Huff playing with the 2nd stringers in the last pre-season game that they just played, why would you give 50 Million to free-agent to have him run with your 2nd string defense? A free agent DE, that signs a 3 year 50 million dollar deal, should be an unquestioned starter in my opinion. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.