Soylent Green Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 I'm more of a lurker here, but I have to say, TX is getting absolutely owned in his little debate. I thought maybe he could hang but it's obvious that his 14000+ posts are pure garbage. End the debate and move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 I'm more of a lurker here, but I have to say, TX is getting absolutely owned in his little debate. I thought maybe he could hang but it's obvious that his 14000+ posts are pure garbage. End the debate and move on. And you say that without any bias right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 I'm more of a lurker here, but I have to say, TX is getting absolutely owned in his little debate. I thought maybe he could hang but it's obvious that his 14000+ posts are pure garbage. End the debate and move on. Solid 13th post SoyedUnderwear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 Of course i happen to agree with what SG has concluded, but I have seen him around the boards plenty, and post count notwithstanding, IMO he has plenty of lurking mileage to give his opinions credibility. In fact, post count is NOT necessarily a good indication of a poster's credibility, as this thread further proves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 Of course i happen to agree with what SG has concluded, but I have seen him around the boards plenty, and post count notwithstanding, IMO he has plenty of lurking mileage to give his opinions credibility. In fact, post count is NOT necessarily a good indication of a poster's credibility, as this thread further proves. Excellent point about counts Jetcane. You and I are both over 3,000. That says alot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted December 19, 2006 Share Posted December 19, 2006 Of course i happen to agree with what SG has concluded, but I have seen him around the boards plenty, and post count notwithstanding, IMO he has plenty of lurking mileage to give his opinions credibility. In fact, post count is NOT necessarily a good indication of a poster's credibility, as this thread further proves. Credibility..what is your opinion on established posters who go around sites with anonymous user names??Mr. perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjets Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 of course TX is getting owned...his old repetative drivle is played out and is now biting him in his own ass.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireJet38 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Seriously. That whole section where BZ refuted TX'S arguements with his own past statements was like trying to avoid staring at a horrific car wreck, but it just lures you in. I think that was gameover right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Excellent point about counts Jetcane. You and I are both over 3,000. That says alot! Yep, we're addicted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 of course TX is getting owned...his old repetative drivle is played out and is now biting him in his own ass.... I'm still waiting for Max to post the National Nielson ratings for the last time the Jets played on national television. Gainzo provided the Pats results. Max, you said you'd post the Jets results, where the hell are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireJet38 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 I'm still waiting for Max to post the National Nielson ratings for the last time the Jets played on national television. Gainzo provided the Pats results. Max, you said you'd post the Jets results, where the hell are they? Sad man, you are clinging to your last hope, being the 'nielsen ratings' to save face. Oh how the mighty have fallen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Sad man, you are clinging to your last hope, being the 'nielsen ratings' to save face. Oh how the mighty have fallen. Dude, your high and mighty webmaster brought that up, not me. Let's see what he posts to support his opinion. Ten bucks says he just makes something up like BZ does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Ten bucks says he just makes something up like BZ does. LOL this is the new schtick? Oy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireJet38 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Dude, your high and mighty webmaster brought that up, not me. Let's see what he posts to support his opinion. Ten bucks says he just makes something up like BZ does. hahahahahahah. I know, I thought it was a great line. You need a hug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Henceforth, BZ is Mister BZ. Sir, that is. Tex? Assume the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EM31 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Clearly I have missed some happenings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Clearly I have missed some happenings Check out the sticky threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireJet38 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Clearly I have missed some happenings Who is that rainbow striped ass in your avatar? Mesmirizing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Here you go all you SAT wonders: Tx is to the food at Taco Bell as BZ is the waiter. Translation: Tx is cheap Mexican food that will make you sick to your stomach but still gets served, and he is getting served by BZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 TX is getting owned. I guess that will teach you to make positive posts about the Jets! They come back to bite you in the ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EM31 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Who is that rainbow striped ass in your avatar? Mesmirizing. No idea, a web find. The file name was "sister.jpg" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 TX is getting owned. I guess that will teach you to make positive posts about the Jets! They come back to bite you in the ass. That's exactly why Troll is one of the best posters on this message board. BTW, how is Vince Young doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 That's exactly why Troll is one of the best posters on this message board. BTW, how is Vince Young doing? Bad week to bring that up. Did you catch the Titans game Sunday? That was the worst performance by a QB on the winning team that didn't turn the ball over that I have ever seen. He ran backwards TWENTY-TWO yards on one play and got sacked. Then with a minute left, instead of taking the sack, he throws the ball away and gives the Jags an extra 40 seconds of life. VY is very lucky the Titans turned in the defensive performance of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Bad week to bring that up. Did you catch the Titans game Sunday? That was the worst performance by a QB on the winning team that didn't turn the ball over that I have ever seen. He ran backwards TWENTY-TWO yards on one play and got sacked. Then with a minute left, instead of taking the sack, he throws the ball away and gives the Jags an extra 40 seconds of life. VY is very lucky the Titans turned in the defensive performance of the year. Didn't see the game. But if I'm not mistaken, Vince Young won again. Would you rather have a winner like Vince Young, or a 30-year old QB who beats up on bottom-feeding teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 I'm more of a lurker here, but I have to say, TX is getting absolutely owned in his little debate. I thought maybe he could hang but it's obvious that his 14000+ posts are pure garbage. End the debate and move on. Why in the world would anyone want to own TX? Be patient with TX hes suffering from the New England DEMISE SYNDROME. As soon as they lose and get knocked out of the playoffs TX will be gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Didn't see the game. But if I'm not mistaken, Vince Young won again. Would you rather have a winner like Vince Young, or a 30-year old QB who beats up on bottom-feeding teams. New England beat the Texans 40-7 talk about beating up a bottom feeding team. So i guess you admit it finally New England is a bottom feeding team our 30 yr old QB beat them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 As soon as they lose and get knocked out of the playoffs TX will be gone. Very solid post, seeing you weren't around here in 2002. EDITED BY MAX - PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE FORBIDDEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Very solid post, seeing you weren't around here in 2002. EDITED BY MAX - PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE FORBIDDEN TX tell me is it lonely in New England especially living in your parents basement. Why is it you spend so much time on a teams board you supposedly hate? I trully believe you are a closet Jets fan. But for some unknown reason you want everyone to believe you are a Patriots fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 When the debate was on the Jets, all he had was "Penny can't beat top-10 defenses." Then when that didn't work as well as he thought it would, he changed the subject to the pats. Who goes into a debate with just one point to make? You can't expect to win like that. As far as I can see, the debate about the jets doing well next year is over and bz won, now its become another debate about how the pats are declining, which bz is also edging out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 DECLINE DEMISE DONE Its all the same it equals New England Patriots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 When the debate was on the Jets, all he had was "Penny can't beat top-10 defenses." Then when that didn't work as well as he thought it would, he changed the subject to the pats. Who goes into a debate with just one point to make? You can't expect to win like that. As far as I can see, the debate about the jets doing well next year is over and bz won, now its become another debate about how the pats are declining, which bz is also edging out. What facts has he provided? "3-4 is working well and will work better next year" Why? "2006 draft was a success and 2007 will add on" Why? "Chad is a winner and 2-2 in the playoffs so 2007 will be great" Why? His 6-18 record against top defenses? Or his 2-2 record inthe playoffs? So his .333 or .500 win percentages equate to success against a much tougher schedule? His arguments are all conjecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 His argument is old. He has NOTHING. As soon as the DEMISE totally sets in and New England is no longer a winner TX will be gone like a bad case of jock itch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Didn't see the game. But if I'm not mistaken, Vince Young won again. Would you rather have a winner like Vince Young, or a 30-year old QB who beats up on bottom-feeding teams. You already know the answer to that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 His argument is old. He has NOTHING. As soon as the DEMISE totally sets in and New England is no longer a winner TX will be gone like a bad case of jock itch. I see you are using BZ logic process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 What facts has he provided? "3-4 is working well and will work better next year" Why? "2006 draft was a success and 2007 will add on" Why? "Chad is a winner and 2-2 in the playoffs so 2007 will be great" Why? His 6-18 record against top defenses? Or his 2-2 record inthe playoffs? So his .333 or .500 win percentages equate to success against a much tougher schedule? His arguments are all conjecture. I tend to agree with that. However, the entire premise of the argument is conjecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.