JiFtheOracle Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 Take that up with pro football refernce. I personally only count W's and L's but this site is pretty much as thorough as it gets. Here's the link. I'm sure they have a complaint department. ** for the record, this and espn is where i check all of my stats, unlike some, I dont have all of the info in my head. Interesting...dont see how he led the game winning drive. I guess he the offense did have the ball to win the game there at the end...but it wasnt like they did anything. Revis got them into position for the FG and the offense failed to get it any closer for Folk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 Interesting...dont see how he led the game winning drive. I guess he the offense did have the ball to win the game there at the end...but it wasnt like they did anything. Revis got them into position for the FG and the offense failed to get it any closer for Folk. STATS DON'T LIE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 STATS DON'T LIE. No true. Only Football Outsiders stats dont lie. Everyone else is a sham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 STATS DON'T LIE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 No true. Only Football Outsiders stats dont lie. Everyone else is a sham. 63.2% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 No true. Only Football Outsiders stats dont lie. Everyone else is a sham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 So where are we ? Is Sanchez the most awful, gut wrenching QB on the face of the planet? If so, well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 you all fell for it ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 Er ah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Sanchez knows our best chance to score is defense, he saw they were ballin' and wanted them back out on the field. Intangibles, can't coach 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Er ah Some of you guys are doing a fantastic job at proving you don't take any joy out of being right at expense of the Jets. Of course, it was just coincidence you had to go and run to bump a thread that had gotten buried over the course of the past day the moment Sanchez ****ed up, right? Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 Some of you guys are doing a fantastic job at proving you don't take any joy out of being right at expense of the Jets. Of course, it was just coincidence you had to go and run to bump a thread that had gotten buried over the course of the past day the moment Sanchez ****ed up, right? Pathetic. I'm bumping it again because he threw a TD. That makes the topic of just how good Sanchez is relevant again, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanFromQueens Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Sanchez has made 1 awful mistake thus far, but other than that... He's had one hell of a 1st half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Er ah You got no rap - but you want to battle It's like havin' a boat - but you got no paddle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemehl Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 As a TD is dropped that was placed in his chest, thanks to Sanchez buying time a la matador, we have just settles for 3. That's 17 offensive TD's 1 thrown, one ran by sanchez. They just flashed a stat saying he has completed six passes to 8 different receivers, so there goes the "locking on receivers" theory. The guy is a winner. Way to come right back firing away after the pick. Ice cold veins. Nice half for shonn, better at least. Nice blocks by Hunter. 17 points with 5 mins left in the first half....... Is any of this good? Of course, I care about one thing ----- 3-0. BTW Brady had 4 picks in ONE GAME today. Bench him? Is he elite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemehl Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 It's 17-14 rite now. rite where we want em Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinnys025 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Sanchez is terrible. He had over 300 yards, but only like 4 passes caught by WR's. Fact is, the majority of his yards were check downs and RB flat plays. How many quick passes is Sanchez going to throw? Once our team is forced to pass, we suck. It's that simple. Sanchez looks like a nervous rookie out there and he's in his THIRD season.....no more excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangisGreen Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Sanchez is terrible. He had over 300 yards, but only like 4 passes caught by WR's. Fact is, the majority of his yards were check downs and RB flat plays. How many quick passes is Sanchez going to throw? Once our team is forced to pass, we suck. It's that simple. Sanchez looks like a nervous rookie out there and he's in his THIRD season.....no more excuses. Really? Lets see you stand behind that line and not be nervous. Honestly I am not a huge Sanchez fan but this game he did what he could. i thought he actually played well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Sanchez was absolutely more than fine today. One horrible throw and decision, but really, he's so far down the list of people who cost us today it's not even worth talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 sanchez ia a tough SOB who plays his best in the clutch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Sanchez is terrible. He had over 300 yards, but only like 4 passes caught by WR's. Fact is, the majority of his yards were check downs and RB flat plays. How many quick passes is Sanchez going to throw? Once our team is forced to pass, we suck. It's that simple. Sanchez looks like a nervous rookie out there and he's in his THIRD season.....no more excuses. DEATH TO SANCHEZ!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinnys025 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 sanchez ia a tough SOB who plays his best in the clutch. That I agree with. Win or loose he tries his a$$ off, but just can't see the whole field.....gets all jittery and makes rookie decisions still in his 3rd year. I WANT him to do good and he has alot to offer the Jets.....just needs to take his time. Maybe it's Schott, who knows? I do notice that when Sanchez is in hurry up and calling his own plays he does so much better so......you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 I'd just like you all to reflect upon how mean you are to me despite my genius, almost prescient, analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I'd just like you all to reflect upon how mean you are to me despite my genius, almost prescient, analysis. people believe in Sanchez like they believe in Jesus. It's not based on facts and figures. it's blind faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 people believe in Sanchez like they believe in Jesus. It's not based on facts and figures. it's blind faith. Where was the faith for those that believed in Gholston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 people believe in Sanchez like they believe in Jesus. It's not based on facts and figures. it's blind faith. It's based on team success and an unwillingness to dig deeper in their analysis as to why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 It's based on team success and an unwillingness to dig deeper in their analysis as to why so what happens if the Ravens or Niners win the Super Bowl... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 so what happens if the Ravens or Niners win the Super Bowl... Defense Wins Championships?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Defense Wins Championships?? Right, more ways to win in this league than having the elite QB. The Jets model can work too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Where was the faith for those that believed in Gholston In ignorance, just like his above statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Right, more ways to win in this league than having the elite QB. The Jets model can work too. I was actually saying the antiquated notion of defense wins championships would erroneously gain support if that were to happen.. No matter, I highly doubt it comes down to that. I guess Baltimore could do it, in a 1 game type situation, but I'd still imagine GB/NO beats them 8 times out of 10.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I was actually saying the antiquated notion of defense wins championships would erroneously gain support if that were to happen.. No matter, I highly doubt it comes down to that. I guess Baltimore could do it, in a 1 game type situation, but I'd still imagine GB/NO beats them 8 times out of 10.. Erroneously gain support because it doesnt fit your criteria of how to win in the league. Unless you have Brees, Brady, Eli, Rodgers or Ben....there's really nothing else you can do other than put a play making defense together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Erroneously gain support because it doesnt fit your criteria of how to win in the league. Unless you have Brees, Brady, Eli, Rodgers or Ben....there's really nothing else you can do other than put a play making defense together. Right. Teams gravitate (and fickle fans too) toward what has been the most resent success. It is a pendulum that swings back and forth, based on what has been the most recent success. Just because the most recent model of success is not the defensive one, does not mean it can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Erroneously gain support because it doesnt fit your criteria of how to win in the league. Unless you have Brees, Brady, Eli, Rodgers or Ben....there's really nothing else you can do other than put a play making defense together. it's not my criteria, it's what happens on the field.. When's the last time a team that wasn't either QB driven or heavily invested in a QB won the SB? Brad Johnson in 2002? And that guy had a season in 2002 that Sanchez has given anyone 0 reason to think he could replicate.. Outside of a brief period in the 80's, it's been all about the QB (current and future HOF'ers in red) (and I left Eli off but that is questionable) Super Bowl I - Bart Starr Super Bowl II - Bart Starr Super Bowl III - Joe Namath Super Bowl IV - Len Dawson Super Bowl V - Johnny Unitas Super Bowl VI - Roger Staubach Super Bowl VII - Bob Griese Super Bowl VIII - Bob Griese Super Bowl IX - Terry Bradshaw Super Bowl X - Terry Bradshaw Super Bowl XI - Ken Stabler Super Bowl XII - Roger Staubach Super Bowl XIII - Terry Bradshaw Super Bowl XIV - Terry Bradshaw Super Bowl XV - Jim Plunkett Super Bowl XVI - Joe Montana Super Bowl XVII - Joe Theismann Super Bowl XVIII - Jim Plunkett Super Bowl XIX - Joe Montana Super Bowl XX - Jim McMahon Super Bowl XXI - Phil Simms Super Bowl XXII - Doug Williams Super Bowl XXIII - Joe Montana Super Bowl XXIV - Joe Montana Super Bowl XXV - Jeff Hostetler Super Bowl XXVI - Mark Rypien Super Bowl XXVII - Troy Aikman Super Bowl XXVIII - Troy Aikman Super Bowl XXIX - Steve Young Super Bowl XXX - Troy Aikman Super Bowl XXXI - Brett Favre Super Bowl XXXII - John Elway Super Bowl XXXIII - John Elway Super Bowl XXXIV - Kurt Warner Super Bowl XXXV - Trent Dilfer Super Bowl XXXVI - Tom Brady Super Bowl XXXVII - Brad Johnson Super Bowl XXXVIII - Tom Brady Super Bowl XXXIX - Tom Brady Super Bowl XL - Ben Roethlisberger Super Bowl XLI - Peyton Manning Super Bowl XLII - Eli Manning Super Bowl XLIII - Ben Roethlisberger Super Bowl XLIV - Drew Brees Super Bowl XLV - Aaron Rodgers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Right. Teams gravitate (and fickle fans too) toward what has been the most resent success. It is a pendulum that swings back and forth, based on what has been the most recent success. Just because the most recent model of success is not the defensive one, does not mean it can't. It can't as long the nfl keeps moving the league in the direction of offense.. sure you may get a team to sneak in and grab one, like we could've in 2009 with competant QB play, but normally the better QB will win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.02d5a086ca7ed80fc66faf3bb6f878c7.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.